ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

2014 Olympics: Short programs

Updated on November 13, 2015

Adelina Sotnikova in 2014

It's a sad fact that Adelina didn't improve a bit from the 2013 World.

And the world was fooled by the ISU and the judges. Well, come to think of it, if you look back, this wasn't the first time. In history, the ISU judges always did that.

The real issue is how often the ISU judges can get away with their lies and institutional deception. Sometimes, it was just a dumb mistake. Sometimes it's incompetence. Sometimes, or perhaps most of times, it was an outright lie and fraud.

Here Adelina did decently, but if you can't tell how poor she actually was, you are not even a regular figure skating observer.

Her PCS is barely 7.0. Period.

Cinderella [Blu-ray]
Cinderella [Blu-ray]

Celebrate Disney's CINDERELLA, a modern classic that shines with beauty, imagination... and magic! Despite being bulled by her stepmother (Cate Blanchett) and stepsisters, a spirited Ella (Lily James) resolves to take charge of her fate. Add a royal ball, a Fairy Godmother (Helenal Bonham-Carter) and a glass slipper, and suddenly -- magic becomes reality!

 

Yuna Kim in 2014

Wow! What a performance!

It appears as if Kim defies all odds against her. Her stamina and power could have held her back, but she shows why she is an unbeatable skater.

Kim execution skills are over the top. Kim's skating is what you call performance.

Her PCS is 9.25.

Caroilina Kostner in 2014

What a performance by Kostner.

She did as best as she could. That's a kudo for her. Jumps are all there and her moves appear okay for all purposes and intentions.

Of course, Kostner's upper body is stiff and her connectivity is still poor compared to Kim's, but she shows appreciable proficiency in her skating. With compliment, her PCS is 8.5.

Junia Lipnitskaya in 2014

Julia was a brave skater, but her skating is illegitimate. That's not what we call figure skating in senior level.

It's just a child's imitation of figure skating.

It takes little to nothing to know how baloney all the hypes the ISU, the judges, commentators and the so called figure skating experts created at the time. I have no personal feeling against Julia, but her skating is nothing but trash.

A child's failed imitation of ballerina's moves. Yeah, who cares anyway? All they need is medal and glory in mob politics.

That ain't figure skating!

I cannot imagine how any sane figure skating coach could produce such a monstrous deformity and claim himself or herself to be a figure skating coach?

This is shame. Her PCS is 6.0.

What do you think is the major reason of the ISU's recurring abuse on the sport?

See results

Comments

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • profile image

      Yunawhatimean 

      3 years ago

      I'm not sure whether you watched Yuna's original raw version of Sochi FS. Her speed quality was just as same as her previous skates. The Sochi camera looked a bit slow for their game of tricks. It's now a well known fact that there was the trickery later founded by the people from raw fan cams. Also, Yuna definitely should have gotten Level 4 for her Steps alone. The Step was a masterpiece, imo, that only rivaled to her famous Giselle program.

    • Jesse Helms profile imageAUTHOR

      Jesse Helms 

      3 years ago from Irvine, California

      Thanks for your comment, SMK.

      As you may already know if you have followed my articles, I have been evaluating performances in the past, some of which were done more than 40 years ago. I wished to show people how relevant the current PCS can be , if handled correctly of course, regardless of time by presenting PCS for performances in the past. At the same time, I hoped that regrading games such as Sochi become another chance to see how consistent my grading is. Especially, this time I kept performances in the past in mind. So there may be two different interpretations possible on these deviations. First, the latest scores include its comparative merits to other performances in different times. Second, it may also hint different judging angles, which eventually refers to judging tolerances. I think this time, I weighed in more on technical elements such as power, strength, and speed while minimizing execution-related merits, that is, in a more competition friendly mode. And the difference of Kim's Sochi free program may stem from a fact that one reflects more on its superiority to her peers' while the other on its relevance to the performances in the past.

    • profile image

      SMK 

      3 years ago

      Hi, I always enjoy your articles. I love them.

      While reading this articles, I found some differences of PCS between this and "The 2014 Sochi Olympics Figure Skating Rescoring 1,2,3" about 1 year ago.

      Specially, you had evaluated Kim's as 9.00 (75) for short and 9.25 (142) for free, while now, you evaluated 9.25 for short and 8.75 for free.

      I wonder what these differences mean.

      I also can find Asada and Kostner's PCS have changed, too. (Though Sotnikova's are almost same or less)

    working

    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

    Show Details
    Necessary
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Features
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Marketing
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Statistics
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)