ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

2015 D3 Volleyball Championships: Why Not Us?

Updated on November 2, 2016

The field for the 2015 NCAA Division III Volleyball Championships was released on Monday, November 9th and sixty-four teams were chosen to compete for the title. For those unaware, the NCAA volleyball field is completed by taking the automatic qualifiers from forty-four conferences and then twenty at-large selections.

A committee of eight coaches, one from each of the eight regions in the country, selects the twenty at-large teams. There are set criteria for picking those squads and they include, in no set order of preference:

  1. Won-Lost Percentage against D3 Opponents
  2. Division III Head-to-Head Competition
  3. Results Versus Common D3 Opponents
  4. Results Versus ranked D3 Opponents at the time of selection (including conference tournaments)
  5. D3 Strength of Schedule:
    2/3 Opponents Winning Percentage (OWP), 1/3 Opponents Opponents Winning Percentage (OOWP)
  6. Won-Lost Percentage during the last 25% of the season.

Now that the criteria is laid out, let's see who were the notable omissions from the field and see the deserving teams that got excluded. Here are the teams that headline the All-Snubbed Squads.

On to the List!

Source

Da' Bears

Ohio Northern headlines a list of teams that were deserving of a bid to the National Tournament. With an overall record of 24-6, 8-1 record in the OAC, and a close five-set loss to Heidelberg in the conference championship, the Bears seem to have a solid resume.

The case for them:

The OAC is traditionally one of the stronger conferences in the country along with the WIAC, SCIAC, UAA, MIAA, CCIW, and MIAC. They were sitting in the sixth spot in the final Regional Rankings prior to the conference tournaments, and were in front of at-large pick Case Western Reserve. The same Case Western Reserve team that lost to Bethany (W.V.) and Hiram in the last 25% of their season.

Why they probably didn't make it:

With only one win against ranked teams (Hope, #3 Great Lakes) and a few tough losses that included at-large team Illinois Wesleyan, they might not have had the heft at the top to earn their way in. It's the same reason why an Ohio Wesleyan Battling Bishops squad with a 26-6 overall record was likely left out as well. Either that or the committee really didn't like programs with mascots that start with the letter 'B.'

Source

The Carnegie Mellon Tartans are the next team up in the overlooked list. With an overall record of 27-7 and 4-3 in the UAA, they had a solid resume for inclusion into the field.

The case for them:

Wins over Stevenson, Chicago, and New Paltz gave them some solid wins over ranked teams. They've got a solid D3 win percentage and losses to Emory, WashU, Juniata, and Eastern can be forgiven.

Why they probably didn't make it:

The bubble started to burst for many a team when the NEWMAC Tournament semifinals took place. When Springfield (29-3) and MIT (29-3) both lost, that shortened the field of at-large teams by two. No fruit basket for either of those teams (yum, yum!). Losing to fellow bubble teams in Case Western late in the season and Chicago at the UAA Championships likely sealed their fate.


Source

The Union (NY) College Dutchwomen are next. With a 29-6 overall record and 9-3 in the Liberty League, they were certainly tournament worthy.

The case for them:

Union was sitting in the second slot of the last Regional Rankings, albeit in one of the weakest regions in the country. Half of their losses were to the number one team in the region (Clarkson) and another was to St. Michael's, which isn't even in D3. With seven wins against colleges that appeared in the Regional Rankings, they had the heft of numbers on their side.

Why they probably didn't make it:

The committee seemed pretty consistent in rewarding teams that won the last match in a head-to-head split. That was the case between Williams and Union. They also suffer from guilt by association with Clarkson who lost to bubble-teams in Berry and Elmhurst. When Clarkson went out and lost, they certainly didn't help the New York Region perceive a strong case for it's at-large teams.

A last point is that their best regionally ranked win came against a team ranked sixth. It's likely a safe bet that other squads had one or more wins versus top regional teams and one thing the National Committee looks for in awarding an at-large bid is the ability to win the region. Union (NY) never proved they could compete with the top teams in any region.

Source

Biggest Surprise Selection?

That honor had to go to Williams. The Ephs got in with an 18-10 overall record and were sitting in seventh place in the final New England Region rankings. The region pulled twelve bids to the tournament and is often seen as one of the two weakest along with New York, which got zero at-large teams into the tournament.

The case for them:

Their schedule. With fifteen ranked schools on the docket out of twenty-eight matches, they went out and played anyone and everyone they could who was good. With a 7-8 record in those matches, they built enough of a case to overlook some iffy losses. They had also been in the Elite 8 recently and were still benefiting from name value.

Why they probably shouldn't have made it:

They had twice as many D3 losses as Union (NY) and split with them head-to-head. Losses to Wellesley and Millikin seemed relatively ignored. And their last nine matches were 4-5. Hardly a strong point for inclusion into the tournament.

Which program was the biggest snub of 2015?

See results

Being a member of the National Committee can be a thankless job filled with stress. Hopefully, the article showed why each team could have made it or been excluded from the field.

This year, I certainly have a bias being from the New York Region and would have liked to have seen Union (NY) make it in. But, as is the case with every team, they left a reason to either put them in or leave them out. Hopefully, each team learns from it and builds on their weaknesses for next season.

Comments

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • Larry Rankin profile image

      Larry Rankin 

      3 years ago from Oklahoma

      Great read!

    working

    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

    Show Details
    Necessary
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Features
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Marketing
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Statistics
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)