ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

European Championship 2012 Overall Review 1

Updated on July 3, 2012

So at the end of another tournament it was Spain who were once again smiling as they lifted their second consecutive European Championship major trophy and3rd major trophy in 4 years including the 2010 World cup.

But what of the other countries who took part and of the tournament as a whole. Did it have a lot to offer. Were there enough quality sides?

There were certainly a lot of good games with most sides prepared to have a go and not just defend constantly. There were therefore very few terrible games but probably no truly outstanding matches either.

But there were some really good teams and some great players in the finals. Some who have been around a while. Others new to this level.

There were 8 teams knocked out after the group stages. For some this stage was probably a great achievement, while for others it would be a major letdown to go out now.

POLAND kicked off the tournament against Greece and in front of their own fans looked a really good attacking team. They took an early lead and had chances to score more in the first half but couldn’t take them. In the second half Greece dominated and the game finished 1-1. This was the way Polands games went. They attacked constantly but didn’t have the finesse to take their chances. Seemed to only have the energy for 45 minutes playing this energetic way before really tiring. Went out after 2 draws and a defeat. With their attacking style it would have been good to have seen them in the knock out stages.

RUSSIA really threw away what should have been certain qualification. They beat CzechRepublic 4-1 in the first game and a victory in the 2nd game, against Poland would have seen them become the first side through. But after leading at halftime Poland came back in the 2nd half and the game finished 1-1. They would still have qualified from their group by drawing with Greece but despite having most of the possession and plenty of chances it was Greece who scored with one of their few attacks and won 1-0. Russia were out with a real feeling of what might have been.

DENMARK were always up against it as they were drawn in a very difficult group but they can regard themselves as very unfortunate. They tried to defend in numbers but break with real purpose. They beat Holland 1-0 in the first game and then went down 3-2 to Portugal and 2-1 to Germany and both winning goals were scored in the last few minutes of these games. They had played well and there remains a thought that they could well have qualified if they had an easier group.

HOLLAND were one of the big favourites for the tournament but badly misfired. A few of their players just didn’t seem to offer anything at all to the team. They created loads of chances against Denmark but still lost 1-0. It was the same story against Germany. Missed a lot of chances. Made mistakes in defence and lost 2-1. Despite losing their first 2 games they could still qualify by beating Portugal. They took the lead but Portugal came back to win 2-1. A lot of people questioned the desire and teamwork coming from the Dutch as they should have certainly done a lot better.

CROATIA, like the Danes are another team to count themselves as unfortunate. In another group they may well have qualified comfortably as they certainly played well against quality sides. They beat Ireland 3-1 before drawing with Italy. In the last game a victory over Spain would have seen them go through and they had chances against an under performing Spanish team but it was Spain who were to score the only goal in the last few minutes.

REPUBLIC OF IRELAND came into their first Euros since 1988 with hopes of doing well. They were on a long unbeaten run and hadn’t been conceding many goals but that all changed right away. Against Croatia they were a goal down in the first few minutes and although they equalised Croatia scored just before and just after half time from bad defensive errors and Croatia won easily. They then conceded early again against Spain and went on to lose 4-0 before losing 2-0 to Italy. This was one of the worst records of a team competing at the European Championships and they certainly played very poorly throughout.

UKRAINE got great backing from their fans and won their first game 2-1 against Sweden despite going behind. In the second game they played poorly to lose 2-0 to France and then in their last game they had to beat England to qualify. They gave a really good effort and created chances but were unable to take them. England scored the only goal just after half time but even then Ukraine could still have got back into the match as a shot had crossed the line but no goal was given.

SWEDEN were a disappointment. They went down in their first 2 games 2-1 to Ukraine and 3-2 to England and even though they were leading in both they never seemed really comfortable. Ibrahimovic seemed to want to take on 3 or 4 defenders so many times in these games even when there were players unmarked and in good positions.

He and the team came good in the last game against France but only after it was too late. Sweden were already out but played really well and won 2-0 and Ibrahimovic’s goal was possibly goal of the tournament.


    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • profile image


      6 years ago

      Russia dont apply enough midfield pressure.

      Holland to me are the finest example of a disjointed team. Full of talented players who dont play with each other for club, they all have a different club and when they play in tournaments the lack of comprehension with each other hurts their flow.

      Sweden for me were unfortunate, a lot of quality but got a bad situation

    • James Vernon profile imageAUTHOR

      James Vernon 

      6 years ago from UK

      Thanks for commenting CCahill. Yes i think there would be a few times really regretting silly mistakes that stopped them going any further.

    • James Vernon profile imageAUTHOR

      James Vernon 

      6 years ago from UK

      Thanks a lot for sharing Thomas. You're probably right about Russia. Maybe too hyped up during the tournament. Would have been interesting seeing them against better teams. I would have much preferred them to go through instead of Greece. That is one country that it's never too much fun to watch!

    • CCahill profile image


      6 years ago from England

      Good Read, as you say; Group A was really for the taking for Russia and will be sure to be rueing their chances but probably none more so than SWE, like you said, throw away the lead 1st against UKR and then against ENG, so you can either say that they were unlucky or they dont deserve to win if they cant defend a lead.

    • Thomas Swan profile image

      Thomas Swan 

      6 years ago from New Zealand

      Russia were really hyped after their first win, but I think that was because no-one was really sure how they did it. Arshavin performed better than he normally does, and Dzagoev was a surprise. I think overall, 4 points was a fair reflection on what the team actually has to offer, but it's still a shame Greece took their place in the quarter finals.

      I like your summary of how each team performed. Sharing on hubpages and twitter and voted up. I'll also put a link to this hub on my Stars of Euro 2012 hub because it supplements it really well.


    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

    Show Details
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)