ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

Why Don Mattingly Does Not Belong In The Baseball Hall Of Fame

Updated on March 3, 2011

Why does everyone care about Don Mattingly?

Every January the Baseball Hall of Fame announces which players have received at least 75% of the vote from the Baseball Writers Association of America and will be inducted into the Baseball Hall of Fame in Cooperstown, New York later that summer. Each year, people come out of the woodwork to gripe about the low vote totals received by former New York Yankees first baseman and current Los Angeles Dodgers manager Don Mattingly.

I'm really not sure why Mattingly has so many Hall of Fame supporters. There are plenty of other players who have been overlooked by the voters who are far more deserving. Perhaps it's because most of these other players were never the most popular player on the New York Yankees.  

I'm going to take a look at each argument made in favor of Mattingly, and one by one I'm going to tear them down. 

The Kirby Puckett Argument

The first thing that many Mattingly supporters will point out is that Kirby Puckett had very similar offensive stats, and he was a shoe-in for the Hall of Fame. This seems valid at first, but we have to dive in a little deeper. For one, Kirby Puckett hit for a higher average. 10 points higher, in fact. His on-base percentage is just a little better than Mattingly's, but a hit is better than a walk in most situations (runners often advance two bases or more on a hit).

Kirby Puckett also lacked the advantage of being a left-handed hitter in Yankee Stadium, a park built for left-handed hitters. He had to do his home hitting in the Metrodome, a stadium that did not deserve its "Homerdome" reputation as much as most people think. 

Puckett was a far more consistent player than Mattingly. His worst batting average in a season was .288. His best was .356. Mattingly's worst was .256, while his best was .352. One look at their stats side-by-side reveals that Puckett was consistently very good, while Mattingly was great for two seasons and a little above average for most of the rest.

It's hard to compare Mattingly and Puckett in the field. Mattingly was a great first baseman, winning 9 Gold Gloves. Puckett was a great center fielder, winning 6 Gold Gloves. A manager values a great fielding outfielder over a great fielding first baseman, and statistics will back that up. The value of a first baseman is above that of a DH, but below that of any other defensive position. The key factor behind this is the fact that they rarely have to throw the ball. Catching a throw from an infielder is far less challenging that throwing it accurately across a diamond. Most first basemen are playing that position because they aren't good enough to play elsewhere. That's a hard pill for some to swallow, but it's true. 

The "Donnie Should Have Won 2 MVPs Argument"

This one I find interesting. Many people claim that Don Mattingly should have won the MVP award in both 1985 and 1986. He won the award in 1985. I would argue that Mattingly deserved only 1 MVP award, and it was in 1986 when Roger Clemens won. The MVP that Mattingly did win should have gone to either George Brett or Rickey Henderson, Mattingly's teammate. George Brett was the only bright spot in a Royals lineup that was rather weak in 1985. He hit 30 home runs and had a higher batting average and slugging percentage than Mattingly. He also won a Gold Glove at third base, a more valuable position than first base. That Royals team won the World Series that year, thanks in large part to George Brett. That's "most valuable" in my book.

If you're going to look at the most valuable Yankee in 1985, I would argue that Rickey Henderson was far more valuable than Mattingly. Statistics back this up. Mattingly's Wins Above Replacement (WAR) is 6.4. Henderson's is a whopping 10.0. He had 80 stolen bases and a .419 on-base percentage. The voters during that era loved the Runs Batted In statistic, which is why Mattingly won. If he hadn't had Henderson batting in front of him and getting on base, he wouldn't have had nearly as many RBIs. Mattingly may have had more plate appearances with a runner in scoring position (second or third base) in 1985 than any other batter in the history of the game.

So, I'll concede the 1986 MVP award to Mattingly because I don't like giving that award to pitchers. But I will not let Mattingly keep his 1985 award, because he should have come in 3rd place in the voting.

The "He Was Great In The Postseason" Argument

Don Mattingly led the Yankees to exactly 1 playoff appearance. He did well in that divisional series, except when he was facing Randy Johnson. The Yankees lost that divisional series 3 games to 2 to the Mariners. Mattingly was the captain of Yankees teams that consistently underachieved. I'm not saying it's his fault, but it did seem to be part of the culture. The Yankees were World Champions the year before Don Mattingly arrived, and they World Champions the year after he retired. They were nothing in the years in between.

Breaking Down The Stats

Let's take a look at Mattingly's career stats and access whether they are Hall of Fame worthy. Remember that he had a short career, but it was not cut short by war or tragedy (some have argued that Puckett gets some extra credit because he was cut down in his prime by a bean ball). Mattingly's career was cut short by back problems, likely the result of his awkward swing.

  •  222 career home runs. That's 20 per 162 game season. Yawn.
  • .307 career batting average. That would be good if he was more of a power hitter.
  • .358 on-base percentage. Very poor for a non-slugger
  •  14 career stolen bases. The guy was a base clogger. That hurts the rest of the team.
  • 1007 runs scored. Good, but not great. 
  • 1099 RBI. Considering he got a good chunk of those in a few seasons when he had Rickey Henderson batting in front of him and Dave Winfield providing protection behind him, that's not good at all. 
  • 0 World Series rings
  • 0 World Series appearances
  • 0 playoff series wins

Wins Above Replacement

Wins above replacement is a complicated stat that attempts to figure out how many wins a player is worth to his team when compared to a replacement level player. Replacement level is not an average player, but actually a below average player. It's basically what you'd get if you called a guy up from triple A. 

Don Mattingly's career WAR is 39.8. That's an average of about 3 wins per season. That isn't terrible, but it's also not Hall of Fame level. To put it in perspective, Tim Raines has a career WAR of 64.6, and he hasn't been voted into the HOF yet. Alan Trammell is at 66.9 and his teammate Lou Whitaker is at 69.7. Whitaker received less than 5% of the vote on his first ballot and thus is ineligible until his name appears on the Veterans Committee ballot in 2015. 

Mattingly In The Hall Of Fame

Don Mattingly would not be the worst player in the Baseball Hall of Fame, but he might be the worst player of the modern era (post-1980). There's no reason the Baseball Hall of Fame should lower its standards just to let in a player who was popular on teams that never came close to being champions. I know Yankees fans were bored during those years, but in hindsight their childhood hero just wasn't as good as they remember. That's a hard fact for many people to face, but it's still a fact.  

Shave that mustache, Mattingly!
Shave that mustache, Mattingly!


Submit a Comment

  • lions44 profile image

    CJ Kelly 

    5 years ago from Auburn, WA

    I'm a huge Mattingly fan and I always thought he was iffy for the Hall of Fame as well. I know we're not supposed to take into account post-season or lack thereof when talking HoFers. But for a Yankee, you have to. And I think you've convinced me once and for all. Great job.

  • dmccray7 profile image


    6 years ago from Merrimack NH

    You hit the nail on the head. Mattingly was the best player on non descript Yankees teams. Put him on the current Yankee team and he would be batting 8th in front of whoever was catching that day.Nice job.

  • James A Watkins profile image

    James A Watkins 

    6 years ago from Chicago

    I am with you. Do Mattingly is not Hall of Fame material. Excellent Hub!

  • Tom T profile image

    Tom T 

    7 years ago from Orange County, CA

    Couldn't agree more. Mattingly had a nice career but he wasn't that feared hitter for long periods of time. He played on a team with lots of talent around him. Actually not that close a call really. I think other like Dale Murphy have better arguments for admission and I still don't think even he belongs. Great Hub.


This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

Show Details
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)