ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

Why the 2002 Sacramento Kings Should Have Beaten the Los Angeles Lakers

Updated on July 28, 2020
CELEBSFAN78 profile image

Ara is a Journalism graduate from California State University Northridge who is always looking to explore his writing opportunities.

The Sacramento Kings of 2001 and 2002 Were the Team Best Equipped to Beat the Defending Champion Lakers

Looking back through the history of the National Basketball Association, there is one team in my mind that should have beaten the Los Angeles Lakers during the 2002 playoffs and that team is the Sacramento Kings. The Kings that year had the best record in the league with 61 wins and 21 losses. The Los Angeles Lakers were very good also having won 58 games that season and they were looking to continue their march to a third straight NBA title. But in this article, we attempt to make the point as to why these Sacramento Kings were not the Sacramento teams of the past and this team was built to defeat the Los Angeles Lakers but they did not do so.

Sacramento Kings Team Logo

Source

Rick Adelman Was the X Factor in the Kings Success That Season

Besides the fact that these Kings had the league’s best record that season, the coaching skill of Rick Adelman had enabled this team to succeed during the regular season even when they were missing certain players.

This Series Was a Chance for Rick Adelman to Somehow Make Up for His Team's Previous Losses in the 1990's

Adelman of course was the coach of the Portland Trailblazers ten years prior to this meeting in the playoffs when he had lost to Phil Jackson’s Chicago Bulls team in 6 games. What were the reasons why the 2002 Sacramento Kings should have beaten these L.A. Lakers even though the Lakers had their two star players Shaquille O’ Neal and Kobe Bryant?

The First Major Reason That the Sacramento Kings Should Have Won

The play of guard Mike Bibby- Guard Mike Bibby gave the Lakers all sorts of problems because of his quickness off the dribble and being able to be such a skilled player on the court. The Lakers had a very tough time keeping up with him.

The Other 4 Major Reasons Why the 2001-2002 Sacramento Kings Should Have Won Against the Lakers


  • Rick Adelman's coaching skils-The coaching skill of Rick Adelman deserves much credit as he was responsible for bringing the Sacramento Kings to national prominence in professional basketball.
  • The play of the Kings other players such as Hedo Turkoglu, Doug Christie, and especially Chris Webber especially should have been the reason that the Kings should have won this series. After the end of the first quarter the Kings were red hot, shooting a blistering 71% from the field while the Lakers shot very poorly even when they had wide open shots.
  • The Kings should have put the game out of reach for the Lakers when they built up a 48-24 lead with 9.5 minutes left in the second quarter and did not do so and this was the biggest reason the Lakers even had a chance to win the series. After a convincing Game three win by Sacramento, they should have won Game 4 and they could have finished the series in just 5 games because they were heading back home anyway. People can argue such things as the referees rigged the series for the Lakers and whatever else, but the fact remains that the Sacramento Kings had a golden opportunity to put these Lakers away and they did not do so.
  • These Los Angeles Lakers were not the 1987 Lakers and this point is significant. The 2001-2002 Los Angeles Lakers did have the dominant strength of center Shaq and the offensive minded young guard Kobe Bryant that was becoming the best young player in the game at that time however, these Lakers did not finish with 65 wins in 2002 that the 1987 team did. This team did not have a brilliant point guard such as Earvin “Magic” Johnson or the brilliant shooting guard Byron Scott. Derek Fisher was a point guard that would hustle for loose balls and get important rebounds but he did not have the skills or the court vision that Magic Johnson did. The bench of the 2001-2002 Lakers cannot match that of the 1986-1987 team. Also, as good of a coach that Phil Jackson is considered to be, he came to teams that were already built to win. Pat Riley trails Phil Jackson in terms of championships but he might have been the better coach.

Image of a Basketball

Source

ESPN Givees a Summary of Game 4 of the 2002 Western Conference Finals

Memorable Quotes from Game 4 of the 2002 NBA Western Conference Finals


“They have 48 points with nine and half minutes to go in the second quarter!”

“Sacramento needed defense on Kobe and one rebound they got neither!”

Bill Walton, commentator who also played for the 1985-1986 Boston Celtics championship team

"Horry for the the win, yes!!!"

Marv Albert's famous call of the game winning three pointer by Los Angeles Lakers forward Robert Horry.

An Additional Reason Why the 2001-2002 Sacramento Kings Should Have Won This Series

The most interesting aspect of this Western Conference Finals series was the huge game winning three pointer by forward Robert Horry who basically got a gift from Vlade Divac when Divac tapped the ball out to the top of the key after a missed layup attempt by center Shaquille O’Neal. Sometimes I like to think of this moment as fate that the Los Angeles Lakers were supposed to win this game and the series but did this event happen because of fate? For the types that are the die-hard Laker fans they will definitely say that the Los Angeles Lakers were destined to win the series against the Kings but I beg to differ on this issue. The Sacramento Kings were in complete control for much of the first half of that game and could have very easily scored over 75 points in that half but with Kobe Bryant slowly picking up his offensive game, the Lakers slowly chipped away at what looked to be an impossible comeback for these two-time defending champions. Vlade Divac should have tapped the ball out of bounds or he should have at least tried to grab the ball and hold on to it and the Lakers would have more than likely fouled him. Some will say that Vlade should have tapped the ball out to the top of the key but Vlade said during that press conference after the game that this shot was a lucky shot. That shot was not a lucky shot as even his own teammate Chris Webber said that it was not a lucky shot. Robert Horry would not have even been in the position to give th Los Angeles Lakers a chance to win this game, let alone the series had the Sacramento Kings held on and won this game even without the services of Predrag “Peja” Stojakovic. This game and the series was the Sacramento Kings’ series to lose and they lost it. As Bill Walton said after the game winner, the Kings needed to play defense on Kobe Bryant and get one more rebound but they got neither. This series loss for the Sacramento Kings should go down in sports history as one of the biggest series losses in the history of any sport.

© 2019 Ara Vahanian

Comments

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    No comments yet.

    working

    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://maven.io/company/pages/privacy

    Show Details
    Necessary
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Features
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Marketing
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Statistics
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
    ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)