ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

Why Apple, Google & Microsoft Should All Be the Target of a Class Action Lawsuit

Updated on May 29, 2012

Get Paid to Write

Share your opinion and expertise and make residual income at the same time by signing up for Hubpages.


The Epic Pissing Match

For the past year or more there has been an on going battle between the Titans of software and hardware over patents. These patent wars have involved more than just Apple, Google and Microsoft, but these are the 3 big players in the market. Other Titans slugging it out in the market include but are not limited to Samsung, Oricle (the owners of JAVA), HTC and more.

The result of these patent wars is an epic pissing match that hurts everyone including the consumers. The purpose of this article is to propose that a class action law suit by the consumers be filed against all the companies involved for propagating anti-competitive behavior, driving up the cost to consumers by this behavior and attempting to use the courts to enforce monopolies, which are illegal in most countries in the world.

The Case Against Apple

Apple has been targeting many companies, but in particular is Samsung and HTC. Through court court orders in 2011 Apple has managed to prevent Samsung from being able to ship and sell some of its products in Australia and German. Shame on the courts of those countries for being the patsies of Apple. But the case against Samsung is an accusation that Samsung copies the iPhone and iPad's look. I have been following this particular issue for a while and I must say, that it sounds like Apple and Samsung are two little kids in the back seat of a car screeching to their mom (the courts), "MOM! SAMSUNG IS COPYING ME!"

I think you get the picture. The result of this particular pissing match is that Samsung is fighting back. Again, this results in harm to us, the consumers.

What is more, recent information has become known through Steve Jobs' biography (may he rest in peace) that he had it in for Android and any company that uses the operating system. Prior to this it was just a rumor that Apple wanted to "kill" our little green friend, but now we have support for it. Apparently Jobs felt that Android was stolen from Apple. Interesting considering that Android is its own unique operating system and the concept of a smart phone existed long before iOS or the iPhone appeared on the scene. This then makes the reality of Apple's anti-competitive behavior stark to observers. Apple does not like the competition and has it in for ANYONE who it views as a threat with the intent to kill. While competition is health, it seems that this particular homicidal rage is not. Since the advent of Android, I would argue that not only has smart phones in general become better, but iOS, Android and Windows Phone 7 (the primary up and coming competitors for the market) have all been improved. Who wins because of this competition? Us! But Apple would not have this be the case. Nor would other companies such as Microsoft.

The Case Against Google

I will be honest, my biggest complaint against Google is more that of inaction than action. Google has stood on the side lines absorbing the punches and not doing much. Still, the fact of the matter is the company has been putting its massive hand out and manipulating the market here and there. The fact that Android is an open source operating system (sort of) does help Google's case a bit, but it has done little until recently to defend its own operating system, instead leaving the brunt of the fighting to the manufacturers that use Android. The result is that Samsung and HTC are bearing the cost of defence and offence. Further more, this complicates the issues of the patent wars as the real case that Apple has is against Google. While Apple may be playing dirty by trying to pick on those "smaller" than it, this does not mean Google is clean and smelling like roses.

I must say of all my cases against the big companies, the one against Google is the weakest. It may be because I have a soft spot against the big monster, or it may be just that there is little I can think of that Google has done wrong. But my point still stands that this pissing match between all these big businesses is doing nothing to help the consumers.

The Case Against Microsoft

Microsoft went from being an innovator to being a sneaky bastard. When the anti-trust suits came against Microsoft the company was simply focused on make a good product and producing it, but that pointless and frivolous law suite was like exposing Bruce Banner to radiation. Now we have a raging Green Hulk that uses the legal system to bludgeon those in its sights into submission (And yes I did use Comic Books and Greek mythology references in the same article. Deal with it. ;-P).

Microsoft's particular sin isn't so much in relation to law suits as it is manipulation. Like Apple, it is going after the manufacturers of Android devices. It is using legal action to say to these companies, "Pay us X amount of dollar per Android device sold or we will sue you." Just the other day I read where Microsoft is making more money from Android than its own Windows Phone 7 and that it now has over 50% of Android manufacturers kowtowing to its wishes.

In essence, rather than using its incredible resources to create its own product better. Microsoft is putting Windows Phone 7 on the back burner and instead leaching off of others success. At this point I would like to take back what I said earlier. Comparing Microsoft to the Hulk isn't fair to the Hulk. Rather, Microsoft seems to be some sort of vampiric parasite that lives off the fruit of other's labors.

Again, this just goes to support my point. Microsoft is doing nothing to improve the climate for consumers or competition. They are increasing costs while at the same time bringing nothing to the table accept perhaps a mediocre operating system that most smart phone users turn their noses up at.

These patent wars are...

See results

Conclusion... or beginning perhaps?

So my point here stands. Apple, Google and Microsoft and/or their cronies are making the market worse, not better due to these stupid patent wars. Their behaviors is contrary to the laws and regulations designed to protect consumers from monopolies and this behavior should stop. I think the only way this will happen is if every nation that they do business in has a class action lawsuit brought against them ordering them to cease and desist! Rather than wasting money and time screeching how they each have been wronged do to a funny look one may have given the other, they each should focus on what their business is. The market will support those operating systems and devices that will bear up under consumer scrutiny. A perfect example of that is the decline of RIM's Blackberry or the eventual dropping of Symbian by Nokia for Windows Phone 7.

But enough from me. What do you think? Should there be a law suit? Am I out of line? Does this ring true to you? Please feel free to comment, share your thoughts and ideas.


    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    No comments yet.


    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

    Show Details
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)