I have just left an area threatened by Bushfires for an area frequented by Floods..In your opinion, which is the lesser of the two evils?
sort by best latest
That is a very good question. I think both are horrible, however I think that floods might be less life threatening than bushfires. Then again, maybe not.... hmm..
You can help the HubPages community highlight top quality content by ranking this answer up or down.
Both are equally bad disaster.
Looking at it, bushfires will likely be worse than floods. Why? When it comes with floods, you might have a better chance of survival than surrounded by bushfires which is more harmful in my opinion.
Generally, you can dry some things out. I've never seen anyone put ashes back together. Any type of disaster is bad, but fire puts a pretty permanent end to things.
Both are evil, just hopefully the bush fires will come before the floods and then the floods will put them out.
Copyright © 2017 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
Copyright © 2017 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.