Katherine Howard- the King's Fifth wife

The young Katherine at court

Katherine Howard was a young woman aged about 19 years old, when she came to the court as a lady in the Queen’s court, and captured the eye of the King. Although literate, she was not highly educated and although her family was descended from Edward I by the Mowbray Duke of Norfolk and shared the Boleyn blood, she was brought up in poor circumstances by a feckless and rather lazy father. Katherine was not an innocent girl as Jane Seymour had been. Living in the home of the Duchess Agnes of Norfolk Katherine was introduced to love at an early age. A music teacher named Henry Mannox tried to seduce her and according to Katherine did not succeed. Her second romance was with Francis Dereham a gentleman in the Duchess’ household at Lambeth. There may have been some sort of pre contracted marriage but there was a full sexual union between the couple who regarded each other as a “man and wife”. Katherine was approximately 17 years old at this time and Dereham was transferred to Ireland wherein Katherine appears to have lost her desire for him, this being replaced by the chance of a place at court.

By an unknown artist in approx 1540
By an unknown artist in approx 1540 | Source

Marriage

In April 1540 King Henry started to show the value of his interest in Katherine by granting her deeds to confiscated lands. It is believed that during April the King consummated his relationship with Katherine and readily expected the announcement of a baby. On 28th July 1540, Katherine Howard and King Henry were married, meanwhile on the same day the King’s former loyal advisor, Cromwell, was being executed at the Tower of London.

The Rose of England


There were tensions in the court and marriage from the beginning. Katherine was a pleasant young girl married to a man whom she revered as King but who by this time of his life was growing obese and was far from a young man in prime condition. He also came with what we would now call “baggage”, his daughter the Lady Mary was five years older than her step mother and the two girls did not form a friendship and Katherine may have felt that Mary was trying to undermine her position remembering the good relationships she had enjoyed with Henry’s previous two wives. Also at this point of his life was the deterioration of the King’s health. He had suffered with leg ulcers since 1528 and the condition exacerbated by his heavy corpulent body was causing extreme pain which often led him to massive mood swings where he could become very angry very quickly.

It is not known if Henry had physical relations with his young wife or whether he could father a child, what is known is that Henry was blissfully married and happy, which is more than his young wife who was forming a relationship with Thomas Culpepper. He was an ambitious ruthless attractive young man in the prime of life and able to charm the young queen. The couple were able to meet owing to the actions of Jane, Lady Rochford, who “covered” for the Queen’s absenses. Again Tudor politics and strategy came into play. King Henry was old and ill by Tudor standards, his son, Edward was still a very young child, Katherine could be left as the Dowager Queen and the man at her side could be in a very strong position.

Queen Katherine accompanied the King on a progress to the north which was done with pomp, splendour and formality travelling as far north as Hull. The royal party arrived back in Windsor on 1st November 1541 and Henry made a solemn thanksgiving for the success of the tour and his happy marriage to his sweet little English rose.

Betrayal


The very next day, the 2nd November 1541, Katherine’s world started to fall apart at a cataclysmic pace. John Lascelles who was the brother of one of Katherine’s chamber women before she was married, spoke to Archbishop Cranmer explainging that the innocent rose was not quite so innocent as she had seemed on marriage. The King was told that day whilst at mass , it was All Soul’s Day, and the accusations that Lascelles had made were put in the Kings hand in writing. As investigations were made of Dereham and then Culpepper it became clear that the allegations were fact based not fiction. The King was upset and very very angry, feeling that he had been duped into marrying damaged goods. Cranmer was sent to Katherine and he obtained from her a confession supporting a pre contract with Dereham and sought to find a quick solution to extracting the King from this marriage.

The arrest of Queen Katherine

Katherine was arrested on 12 November 1541 and in the meantime torture was used to extract information from witnesses to the events. It is doubtful that Katherine had a “full sexual relationship” with Culpepper but there were many confessions of clandestine meetings and late night moving between bed chambers, The sister in law of Anne Boleyn, Lady Rochford had played her part provoking Culpepper into a relationship with the Queen. Dereham and Culpeper died on 10th December, Dereham by disembowelling and castration whilst still conscious and Culpeper by the executioners axe. Queen Katherine was sent to Syon Court and operated a restricted existence being deprived of the gifts and wealth that the King had given her. On 22 November 1541 the King’s council removed her title of Queen and two days later she was indicted for having led “an abominable, base, carnal voluptuous and vicious life before marriage.”, “ like a common harlot… maintaining the outward appearance of chastity and honesty “ . It continued that she had led the King to live her and “coupled herself with him in marriage”. By concealing the pre contract that she had with Dereham it was to the peril of the King and any children that they may have had together. Added to this she had shown Dereham favour after her marriage to the King and incited Culpeper to intercourse by telling him that she loved him more than the King.

Paying the ultimate price for the King's disfavour

Many of Katherine’s friends and family were taken to the Tower but not the Duke of Norfolk who again survived the fall of his family., these people were released over the next ten months, all that is except Katherine. Katherine was taken from Syon House to the Tower of London on 10th February and shortly afterwards was told that she would die. She was executed on the 13th February 1542 at the same place and on the same block that her cousin, Anne Boleyn had met her death, nearly six months earlier. Her body was buried near to that of her cousin Anne in the Chapel of St Peter Ad Vincula in the Tower of London. Katherine’s execution was followed by that of Lady Rochford who had been instrumental in gathering evidence to convict her sister in law Anne Boleyn and her husband Thomas Boleyn and send them to their deaths

More by this Author


Comments 16 comments

Just History profile image

Just History 4 years ago from England Author

I dont think that Lady Rohcford was a very nice person- certainly you would not want her as a friend- Thanks for your visit


Kathleen Cochran profile image

Kathleen Cochran 4 years ago from Atlanta, Georgia

I never knew that Lady Rochford's life ended with execution. Seems fitting. This history so reads like a novel, it's amazing to realize these are historic facts. Thanks for your extensive work.


Just History profile image

Just History 4 years ago from England Author

CMHypno- Thanks for your comment- I can only think that she was none too bright or alternativey she did not have the appropriate upbringing to survive in the Tudor court. et's face it, even an intelligent woman like Catherine Parr only survived by the skin of her teeth!


CMHypno profile image

CMHypno 4 years ago from Other Side of the Sun

Interesting hub case1worker. I have always thought that Katherine Howard was a bit stupid to think that in such a claustrophobic, paranoid place as the Tudor Court that she wouldn't get caught. Especially as she knew what had happened to her cousin. Apparently she spent the night before her execution practising placing her head on the block, and she died bravely even though she was so young.


alancaster149 profile image

alancaster149 4 years ago from Forest Gate, London E7, U K (ex-pat Yorkshire)

The Reformation would still have caught up with England and Wales, although loyalty to the 'Old Church' was still strong in the north more than anywhere else in Britain. The Pilgrimage of Grace near Northallerton was put down by Henry with singular ruthlessness, the 'ring-leaders' executed as traitors. I'm not Catholic myself, but that smacked of an act of extreme despotism, worthy of a Nazi regime. Henry himself was not so much an agent of the Reformation, as a self-centred exploiter of his position. Edward VI might have been a better king, but he was weak and sickly, and may have proved a 'tool' for whoever was able to steer him beyond puberty. He was gradually poisoned by his physicians under orders from sister Mary who swung the grim reaper's sickle back the other way. Elizabeth was as much a tyrant as Daddy, but could curb her enthusiasm when it suited her - and that led to James VI of Scotland. Again, Charles was Duke of York, who had an older brother groomed for the crown, who died and effectively put his weak-minded little brother on the throne... After him - because Cromwell didn't want the royal castles to be used as bolt-holes for royalists - we ended up with a load of ruined abbeys AND ruined castles. We've got arguably the best collection of ruins in Europe.


Just History profile image

Just History 4 years ago from England Author

Alancaster 149- thank you for your very definite opinion!!I had not thought through how the Tudor legacy affects my daily life- without Henry would we still be a catholic country? An interesting rhought!

Anne Harrison- Thank you for your visit- I am so glad I didn't live then!


Anne Harrison profile image

Anne Harrison 4 years ago from Australia

What an unfortunate time and place to live! A really interested hub - voted up - thank you for sharing it.


alancaster149 profile image

alancaster149 4 years ago from Forest Gate, London E7, U K (ex-pat Yorkshire)

But for the death of his older brother Arthur, Henry woud never have been king. He wasn't suited to the responsiblity, nor had he been groomed for the task! We know the outcome of his reign, England and Wales have been blessed with a collection of ruined abbeys. Then again the Tudors were delivered their come-uppance and died out in just over 115 years after a short series of tyrants. They and their successors the Stuarts were responsible for blackening the reputations of Richard III and Macbeth through the pen of a said William Shakespeare Esquire. Good riddance to bad rubbish!


Just History profile image

Just History 4 years ago from England Author

Suzie ONeill- thankyou for your visit and your kind comment!


Suzie ONeill profile image

Suzie ONeill 4 years ago from Lost in La La Land

Fascinating hub. Vited up and interesting!


Just History profile image

Just History 4 years ago from England Author

Thelma Alberts- thankyou for your visit and kind comment- I think I could write about Henry all the time- he certainly was a larger than life character!


Thelma Alberts profile image

Thelma Alberts 4 years ago from Germany

A fascinated history! I love reading British history books and King Henry V111 life story is very interesting. As what phdast7 said,we are lucky to live by the rules of our law.


Just History profile image

Just History 4 years ago from England Author

phdast7- quite true but I guess he was a ittle upset- I mean marriage is for life- well it was in her case!!!

Thnaks for your visit and kind comment


phdast7 profile image

phdast7 4 years ago from Atlanta, Georgia

Fascinating history, maybe for everyone. I forget sometimes how lucky we are to live under "rule by law" (imperfect thought it may be) as opposed to rule by royal decree or temperament.


Just History profile image

Just History 4 years ago from England Author

Judi Bee- thankyou for being the first to visit and for leaving such a kind comment.


Judi Bee profile image

Judi Bee 4 years ago from UK

Thank you! - always enjoy your hubs. Voted up etc.

    Sign in or sign up and post using a HubPages Network account.

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked. Comments are not for promoting your articles or other sites.


    Click to Rate This Article
    working