ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

Movie Review: “Get Out”

Updated on May 29, 2020
Movie Beasts profile image

There are many movies that are worth seeing, but there are a lot of stinkers as well. My goal here is to weed out the good from the bad.

Get Out

Theatrical Release: 2/24/2017
Theatrical Release: 2/24/2017 | Source

Synopsis

Chris (Daniel Kaluuya) and Rose (Allison Williams) have been dating for five months and it is time for Chris to meet Rose's family, so the two plan on spending the weekend at Rose's parents house. Chris is initially nervous that there will be racial tension, but Rose does her best to reassure him and convince him into going. Once at the house, Chris is the recipient of some awkward comments from the family and as the weekend goes on, strange things start to unfold. The black men and women working at the house are acting very weird, Rose's mother (Catherine Keener) is a psychiatrist that practices hypnotism, Rose's father (Bradley Whitford) is a passive racist, and Rose's brother (Caleb Landry Jones) is a loose cannon. All of these things lead to Chris having a bad case of racist paranoia, so he must determine: what is wrong with the people in this house, is this family really racist, how much danger is he in, and how can he Get Out.

Official Trailer

The Pros & Cons

The Pros
The Con
The Acting (+8pts)
Hypnosis (-5pts)
Racism (+8pts)
"Racism" (-4pts)
The Mystery (+5pts)
Trailer Syndrome (-1pts)

All movies start with an average score of 75pts, points are then added or subtracted based on each Pro and Con. Each Pro or Con is designated points, ranging from 0-10, to convey how significant these Pros or Cons are.

Source

Pro: The Acting (+8pts)

This movie is filled with good actors giving good performances. The best performances came from the actors who played the workers at the house, specifically the actress who played Georgina (Betty Gabriel). These actors had to play very complex characters (you will understand why I say that if and when you have seen the movie). This movie depends on these actors playing their characters in a convincing way. With all of the "switches" and craziness, this movie just does not work if the audience cannot believe in these characters. The "switches" (again, you will know what I mean if and when you have seen the movie) need to seem natural and need to be convincing. Betty Gabriel was a huge standout in this movie, her scenes were creepy and very intense. She gave the movie depth as her character provided hostility, agony, and creepiness (sometimes all at the same time!). I was incredibly impressed with the performance by Betty Gabriel and would have liked to have seen this character explored further.

Source

Con: Hypnosis (-5pts)

This movie hinges on the concept of hypnosis. If you do not believe in hypnosis as being a real thing, then you need to leave that opinion behind when you go in to watch this movie. Just pretend, for a little less than two hours, that you believe in hypnosis. Anyway, I thought the concept of hypnosis was used effectively in this movie, my problem was with the execution. I had two major issues with it.

The first was the fact that it was way too easy for the hypnosis to work once it had been started, especially since the person being hypnotized was a reluctant participant. My second problem with hypnosis in this movie was what they referred to as "the sunken place". This was a weird concept and the visual effect used to represent the sunken place was strange and took me out of the movie. I also thought that the sunken place should have been explained more clearly. The movie just kind of threw this concept at you and left it to the audience to try to interpret how it worked. Hypnosis was a key part of this movie, but I thought the filmmakers could have handled it better.

Source

Pro: Awkward Racism (+8pts)

I thought this movie worked best when it was showing the awkward racism that Chris had to deal with over this weekend. The movie utilized a type of racism that you do not often get to see in movies. That racism is presented as friendly or presented as a compliment, but is still very clearly racist. I thought it was interesting to see how Chris had to deal with this. The racist comments were not presented in a hostile way, and they came from the family of the girl that he was dating, so Chris just had to accept it — even though it very clearly bothered him. I think this was fascinating to see on screen and I can not imagine what it must be like for anyone that must live in a situation such as that. What this awkward racism does is it makes all of the uneventful, heavy dialogue scenes more interesting to watch, because it added so much tension to each scene. This caused the audience (or at least me) to never be bored throughout all of the heavy dialogue in the rising action.

Source

Con: "Racism" (-4pts)

Like I said, this movie worked best when it was addressing the awkward racism and the paranoia that it caused Chris to have to deal with. For most of the movie, this worked and it was very interesting to watch. However, in roughly the third act of the film, Chris made a discovery that caused the movie to kind of take a turn away from what made the previous acts so great. Unfortunately, neither the third act or the first two were bad, but they did not fit together. What I mean by that is that Chris went from dealing with the awkward racism for two full acts of rising action, then the climax presents a completely new issue. Almost as if the climax was taken from a different movie and slapped onto the end of this one. I think the climax of the movie would have worked a lot better if the "new issue" had been teased and suggested at from the beginning. Instead it seemed like the racism that Chris was dealing with the whole time ended up being irrelevant.

Source

Pro: The Mystery (+5pts)

Coupled with the awkward racism, this movie was made so compelling by watching Chris as he tried to understand what on earth was going on with the people at this house. Why were the people working at the house acting so strange? What was the extent of the mother’s hypnosis capabilities? Were the two somehow connected? If they were connected, why was this all happening? I thought this movie did a very good job of taking the audience on this journey with Chris. It gave just enough clues to keep the movie interesting, but it did not give enough to give away the answers. While I did not think that the climax worked well with the rising action, the rising action was clearly effective at keeping the movie interesting.

Source

Con: Trailer Syndrome (-1pts)

I do not think a movie should be judged by the effectiveness or flaws of its trailers, which is why I think this is such a minor issue. That being said, I think this movie suffered a bit from trailer syndrome. To me, trailer syndrome is when a trailer gives away too much. In this case, while the trailer does not (in any way) reveal the ending of this movie, I think a lot of the more memorable or intense moments were in the trailer. Chris going out at night and running into Walter (Marcus Hendersen) or the majority of the creepy scenes from Georgina. There were many more examples of this, but I unfortunately think that this movie would have been far more effective if the trailer did not include so many of the more creepy or startling moments of the movie. I do not believe that this significantly hurt the movie, but I think it was worth noting.

Grading Scale

Grade
Category
Points
A+
Amazing
95-100
A-
Great
90-94
B+
Good
85-89
B-
Decent
80-84
C+
Average
75-79
C-
Watchable
70-74
D+
Bad
65-69
D-
Terrible
60-64
F
Garbage
45-59
Source

Grade: B+ (86pts)

Get Out was a very interesting movie to watch unfold. The awkward racism, and paranoia that went along with it, provided a fresh idea for a movie in the horror-thriller genre. I think the concept of hypnosis was a good addition but I think that the execution was weak. The movie was at its absolute best whenever the awkward racism is explored or whenever the people who worked at the house were on screen. This was especially true for the character of Georgina and the actress who played her (Betty Gabriel). I thought Get Out had great rising action, but I thought the climax of the movie fit poorly with the rest of the movie and did not capitalize on the magnificent rising action from the first two acts of the film. Overall, I would say that Get Out was a good movie, but not amazing, and while I think this movie is worth checking out, I would try not to let your expectations get too high.

working

This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://corp.maven.io/privacy-policy

Show Details
Necessary
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Features
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Marketing
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Statistics
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)