Merry Bleepmas and Happy Holidays - Why Christmas Becomes Politically Correct

Imagine that you are in your child's school for the annual winter concert. You listen to a buffet of the songs the chorus, band, or orchestra performs, from marches to arrangements of folksongs. You previously expected Christmas songs, but the array of songs that don't involve the holiday dashes your dreams.

Why would a school program discourage your child and his fellow singers/musicians from performing the songs of the season, or in particular, holiday. Where have the seasonal standards - "We Wish You A Merry Christmas" and "Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer" - gone? Is the school not in the mood for Christmas?

Let's face it - every year, Christmas is being erased from schools and public places. School programs ax out the holiday's songs and replace them with everyday tunes like nursery rhymes. Crèches (also known as nativity scenes) are treated as public seasonal vandalism and thus taken out of the public's eyes. To some, it's a big Christmas-spirit downer. So why is Christmas being censored and banned?

To understand why Christmas is becoming a politically correct matter, take a look back at the early Colonial times. Among the first colonialists by religion were the Puritans, a Christian denomination. They believe in very firm, tight Christian values, and are very strict in celebrating observances.

Roots and Reasons

Christmas was no exception to them back then, and they view it as a pagan festival. The holiday involved excessive feasting, dancing, singing joyous songs, and drinking - activities they frowned upon. Also, they believed that Jesus was probably born on a September or October, and that December 25th was just a normal day.

Although Christmas became a federal holiday in America in 1870, the religious offenses against the holiday still remain despite fading as it became more secular. Today, some non-Christian groups want equality in those so-called "winter events," namely Jews (who celebrate Hanukkah), Muslims, atheists (who don't believe in a god or idol), and Jehovah's Witnesses (who have virtually the same views of Christmas being pagan as the old Puritans).

In order to make those events inclusive to those groups as well as Christians, one has to leave out Christmas and create secular approaches and activities. There is an old saying that one bad apple spoils the whole barrel. Thus public places take it to heart by removing holiday references to satisfy those who do not celebrate it.

Bing Crosby is rolling in his grave when he sees this.
Bing Crosby is rolling in his grave when he sees this.

You Can't Sing (or Play) That - It's Too Christmassy!

Since the times when monks wrote chants, Christmas music delighted everyone who celebrates it. For those who don't because of religious reasons, they are akin (to them) to the profanity-laden songs of today. The words that are to be censored are "Christmas," "Santa," "Jesus Christ," and whatever relates to God or Christmas.

Take the standard, "Silver Bells," for example. In Ottawa, Canada, a school changed the lyrics, replacing the word "Christmas" with "festive." Another elementary school in Wisconsin had their kids sing a song (actually from a play) to the tune of "Silent Night" called, "Cold in the Night." The song angered many who celebrate the religious aspects of Christmas, because they believed that the school secularized the real hymn.

Some schools ban all Christmas songs to make their student body more inclusive. In Australia, a primary school replaced its Christmas carols concert with one with nursery rhymes and cleaned-up versions of pop songs to make a Jehovah's Witness more welcome.

But vocal music is not the only genre of music to be cleared of Christmas and its references (except winter in general). Instrumental music can get the negatively (to most of those who celebrate the holiday) cleansing treatment as well.

One notorious example is the outlaw of all versions of Christmas music in the South-Orange-Maplewood School District in New Jersey. Teachers ordered elementary school children in choruses not to belt out, "Santa Claus is Coming to Town." They told high schoolers in concert bands not to play instrumental "holiday" medleys.

I fear that if schools districts instruct teachers to secularize their "winter concerts," they might as well tell the orchestra or band students not to play arrangements of the sinfonia of Bach's Christmas Oratorio. (To add insult to injury, those who know the choral work say it's all about the birth of Jesus.)

I also fear that if teachers continue to single the Yuletide season out of their school music programs, more music events that have religious music of the season (Epcot's Candlelight Processional is no exception.) would follow suit.

Merry Bleepmas - NOT!
Merry Bleepmas - NOT!

Christmas - the New F-Word?

To some retailers and those who serve to the general public (in religious terms), the word Christmas is just as offensive to non-Christians as the N-word is offensive to black people. Retailers instruct employees to use mundane terms, like the more generic "Happy holidays" or "Season's greetings."

Ditto for advertisers, to whom they tell them to tout "holiday trees" instead of "Christmas trees." Even school principals instruct students to use generic greetings, or else they would face disciplinary action for mentioning Christmas. Because of religious aspects, the phrase "Merry Christmas" is like saying God's name in vain.

Only Winter Symbols, Please.

The main aspect of replacing Christmas with inclusive aspects of the season is deciding which symbols are allowed. In Plano, Texas, the school district instructed children to bring only white party utensils, like plates, cookies, napkins, spoon-forks, and cakes. They also had to wear white. Allegedly, no red or green clothing, food, or supplies were allowed because those colors associated strongly with Christmas. (Ditto for purple and pink, because they are Advent colors.)

In Ashland, Oregon, the school board ordered an elementary school to remove a decorated tree (called a "giving tree" because it includes lists of things wanted by impoverished children) because it is a Christmas symbol, although the holiday was not mentioned. Subsequently, its principal banned all aspects of Christmas as well as Hanukkah, banning Santas, dreidels and the like. Only wreaths, candles, candy canes, snowflakes and snowmen were allowed on display.

In many places, the nativity scenes are to most officials at public places offensive graffiti and thus banned from displays. Unless they understand how bad the majority of people who celebrate Christmas feel, it won't be long until they display only snowmen in generic winter clothing, snowflakes, undressed penguins, and snowy birch trees.

Other places ban all decorations regardless of how Christmassy it is. For example, the Florida's Turnpike Enterprise ordered a moratorium on all decorations in light of complaints from motorists.

Should Christmas Day be treated as just an ordinary day when kids go to school is it offends non-Christians? Probably not, but many public officials treat the holiday as a private, intimate matter, whether those who celebrate it observe the birth of Jesus or merely spend it together with their families.

I approve of the term, "Happy Holidays," but only in conjunction with the mention of the word Christmas. I also believe that balance is key to everything, and public places should balance out the secular and religious. It doesn't matter whether the angel Gabriel or Frosty the Snowman pops up in events and displays. Don't you agree?

Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays!

Does Christmas Offend You?

See results without voting

More by this Author


What do you think of Christmas being PC? 5 comments

lrohner profile image

lrohner 6 years ago from USA

How sad and how true. When my kids were younger, the schools would sing songs and decorate for all of the holidays--Kwanzaa, Christmas, Hanukkah, etc. instead of excluding them all. It seems like the kids are definitely the ones missing out.


mbwalz profile image

mbwalz 5 years ago from Maine

All change seems sad at first, especially when the change excludes something near and dear to you. But I see only two ways to do this celebration thing correctly:

1. Be very secular and sing and celebrate the season, something that everyone can enjoy. After all, each Holiday is celebrated very differently - Christmas is hardly the same thing in each house!

2. Or celebrate ALL the holidays. Our public school system has kids from so many backgrounds, it would probably take a full-time administrator to coordinate all the celebrations the kids participate in at home. And the poor teachers who are just scrambling to teach all that is expected of them in a very abbreviated time schedule would really struggle.

I think the key is that our country honors the rights for each person to celebrate whichever holiday they choose, however their tradition has taught them - even creating new traditions! But there is no "right" for Christmas to be celebrated in my town or school.

It does seem funny to me that Christians are the main group that complain about not being able to pray and celebrate their religion anywhere they want. Most people who feel strongly that prayer should be allowed in school would be the first to complain when their children come home having learned a prayer from the Koran!

Wouldn't Peace on Earth be wonderful?


oceansnsunsets profile image

oceansnsunsets 5 years ago from The Midwest, USA

It is definitely a sad state of affairs. Some are being a bit extreme, and being overly sensitive and it does wreck it for all the kids. It sends a wrong message to specifically do away with one part of Christmas, while trying to promote other nations or religions holidays. That is no different. I think the desire of many has backfired as well. I say live and let live, and hopefully everyone can get along, and not specifically target certain groups and try to change people. That is when it gets borderline dangerous. The lady in the video makes some great points. Thanks for sharing your views on a very important topic!


poetrob68 profile image

poetrob68 5 years ago

You did a great job addressing this. I have to disagree

with the previous commenter though. The only Reason Christians complain about not being able to practice their

religion where ever they want is, Christian practices are

the only ones being banned while other religions are free

to express themselves.


Eiddwen profile image

Eiddwen 4 years ago from Wales

A great hub and your obvious hard work has paid off without a doubt.

Very well presented and leaves much food for thought.

Take care and enjoy your day.

Eddy.

    Sign in or sign up and post using a HubPages Network account.

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked. Comments are not for promoting your articles or other sites.


    Click to Rate This Article
    working