Chopra, Spiritual Escapism & Fantasy—Charmed Myths & Feel-Good Prose Don’t Lead to Enlightenment

55
rate this page

By scottpetullo


Deepak Chopra's original success stemmed from his strong
talent for creative writing and bringing together Eastern
philosophy and healing methods with Western Medicine.
Chopra's work tends to be more appealing to those who
like their spiritual concepts to read in a more obscure
yet poetic fashion, including folk-tales and fables.
 
We respect his early work and like that he has been 
instrumental in introducing Eastern spirituality to many 
Westerners, but feel he's gone off on a totally different 
path. We miss the old Chopra.
 
Chopra's current approach appears to be targeting 
an audience with a thirst for "spiritual romance" and 
escapism, a lack of understanding of or a refusal to 
acknowledge the dynamics of karma and personal fate, 
and a distaste for reason and critical thinking in favor 
of feel-good prose. This is a group that is easily led 
in circles and guided into hungrily devouring unsupported
assertions and who will gladly embrace fantasy and
self-delusion, expecting (yet will be forever denied)
significant life-changes from magical epiphanies through
poetry and charmed myths.
 
Regarding the promotional material for one of his recent
books, we are disappointed with the way it reads and feel
the statements made contribute to the bad image the New 
Age and metaphysical field has earned (yes, earned). 
The following are select quotes from the promotional 
email and our comments.
 
"In just one hour, you can learn what it takes to be 
successful in all areas of your life."
 
This statement is misleading. He may outline what helps
to be successful in all areas of life, but it would be
impossible to give a formula for everyone to follow in
order to be successful. Based on our experience and
research, "what it takes," in addition to initiating the 
right action at the right time, and having the right 
supportive circumstances, is fate, and everyone's 
personal fate is different.
 
"You can have material wealth, as well as good health,
energy and enthusiasm for life, and fulfilling 
relationships."
 
This declaration is also misleading. It implies that 
everyone is entitled to these things and they can have 
them if they read this book. No amount of mediation, 
praying, manipulating, affirmations, seminars, readings, 
or focus on strengthening and magnetizing beliefs will 
lead to those things if it's not someone's fate to have 
them.
 
"This ‘One Hour of Wisdom' edition of Chopra's most 
popular title offers powerful pearls of wisdom and a 
life-altering perspective on the attainment of success."
 
We give Chopra credit for how he helps to inspire 
others through this book. This is what he's good at. 
However, whether or not the perspective offered is 
"life-altering" is debatable.
 
"It shatters the myth that success is the result of hard 
work, exacting plans, or driving ambition."
 
Also misleading. For some it may be, for others it may 
not be.
 
"Discover the natural laws that govern all of creation, 
align with these laws, and success comes easily and 
naturally. But first, these principles must become your 
second nature, and repetition is the key to learning 
them!"
 
This statement implies that if you follow his 
recommendations, success will be yours, easily. 
If this were true, anyone could have anything they 
wanted, despite their personal fate and karma. 
Through our extensive research, we've found this 
belief to be false, no matter if they are beginners
or gurus who already practice such concepts. The 
"second nature" emphasis is cleverly outlined to 
allow the author some breathing room when his 
readers don't get what they want "easily and 
naturally."
 
"The ancient sages described the most effortless way 
to bond with the universe and fulfill our desires.
Their guiding motto turns out to be exquisitely simple: 
Act in accord with the laws of nature." -Deepak 
Chopra
 
Chopra is saying that if you act in accordance with 
the "laws of nature," you can have all you desire. He 
peppers his books with spiritual principles to support 
lofty promises, but what he fails to mention, or perhaps 
doesn't fully comprehend, is that there are additional 
laws, some of which completely mitigate some of his 
views.
 
Also, he erroneously groups select "sages" together 
with the mystics and Gnostics (such as most respectable 
ancient astrologers who regularly predicted personal 
fate) who constantly refuted, through stellar predictive 
work, the notion of anyone being able to "fulfill any 
desire."
 
We asked a friend of ours, a Chopra fan, for his 
interpretation of a particular (cool-sounding, yet 
erroneous) passage in the book: "The law of intention
and desire: Inherent in every intention and desire is
the mechanics for its fulfillment." He replied, "I
don't know what it means, man, it just feels good!"
 
Truth be told, everyone has occasional (for some, 
very regular) desires that aren't rooted in reality 
(thus, are unachievable), such as wanting to end 
strife and war on Earth forever, or achieve major 
career goals and become a multi-billionaire without 
effort and the supportive good karma. Perhaps the 
multitudes new to Eastern philosophy and metaphysical 
thought don't really care about truth at this point,
until they realize the emptiness of these supposed
fixes.
 
Thinking back to the early 1980's when we first began
exploring non-traditional spiritual concepts, we had
to weed through a lot of books to begin to be able to
detect truth. At first, the superficial, sometimes
"channeled," "spiritual" writings, the far-out, empty
rhetoric and gross generalizations lacking substance did
have some appeal, but it's like a destructive, sensually
gratifying habit; it offers an escape from reality, but
ultimately leads you down the path of illusion and
distances you from "enlightenment." If you love
inspirational poetry, fine, but it's in your best
interest to avoid confusing it with spiritual truth.
 
It's disconcerting, to say the least, to have a very 
commercially successful author imply that you can 
have the success he has enjoyed ($20 million + earnings
in 2006, according to Forbes magazine) if you would
just take the hazy, feel-good approach he promotes,
when that author refuses to acknowledge that everyone
may not be fated for what he promises. The laws of
personal karma and fate dictate that you can't have
what you want unless it's predestined as part of your
destiny and you've earned it through current life and
especially past life actions. Unfortunately, many may
buy this book hoping to reach certain goals. If they
don't reach those goals, they may end up feeling worse 
than before.
 
We applaud Deepak Chopra for his intelligence and for the
success he's had in reaching people all over the world with
inspiration and encouragement. We just would like to see
more plain truth and fewer false promises, even though
it may result in fewer book sales.
 
Scott Petullo
http://www.mystictwins.com/
 
Stephen Petullo
http://www.holisticmakeover.com
 
Copyright © Scott Petullo, Stephen Petullo
 
WANT TO PUBLISH THIS ARTICLE?
You have permission to publish this article as long as it is 
published in its entirety, no changes are made to the article, 
and the Mystic Twins title above and our website links are 
included. We also request an advance email to let us know what
content will be used, by whom, when, and where.

  —   Rate it:  up  down  [flag this hub]

Comments

RSS for comments on this Hub Small RSS Icon

No comments yet.

Submit a Comment

Members and Guests

Sign in or sign up and post using a hubpages account.


optional



working