Is It a Cut, an Increase -- or What?
54
|
|
BARNEY FRANK WWD? DEMOCRAT MASSACHUSETTS POLITICS SHIRT
Current Bid: $9.95
|
|
|
Barak Obama America Democrat Politics sticker freeship
Current Bid: $.99
|
|
|
Democrats, Republicans, and the Politics of Women's Pla
Current Bid: $22.35
|
|
|
PROUD TO BE A DEMOCRAT DNC Mardi Gras Bead Politics
Current Bid: $4.21
|
|
|
Great American Hypocrites: Toppling the Big Myths of Republican Politics
Price: $8.59
List Price: $14.95 |
|
ANTI REPUBLICAN democrat politics government vote SHIRT
Price: $19.99
List Price: $27.99 |
|
|
REPUBLICAN PARKING sign * street politics
Price: $19.95
List Price: $24.95 |
|
Last Man Standing - Politics, Texas Style
Price: $16.69
List Price: $26.95 |
Democrats talk of draconian cuts in the budget. Republicans, aghast, say that what the Democrats characterize as "cuts" are really increases, albeit smaller increases.
Who's telling the truth?
In my opinion, they're both telling the truth -- but from different perspectives. It's a matter of judgment.
It's like two people witnessing the same event, but coming away with totally different conclusions.
For instance, if two people see a passerby give a homeless person a half-dollar for a cup of coffee, each may come away with an entirely different view. One might see that as a kindly act designed to relieve the plight of someone who's down on his luck; the other may see it, not as a kindly act, but rather as a disservice to the individual who likely would use the half-dollar to buy alcohol or support his drug habit.
No one can say with certainty that one position is right and the other is wrong, but one can certainly express a strong personal opinion one way or the other.
It's all in how you look at it. It's the same with budget cuts.
Sometimes, when you spend a great deal of time and energy looking at details, or at peripheral matters, you can lose perspective.
I think this was what the late Sen. Everett Dirkson was getting at when he said (paraphrasing): A billion here and a billion there, and pretty soon you're talking about a lot of money.
It's easier to understand why politicians have trouble figuring out when a cut is a cut, and when a cut is not a cut, when you get away from the big items like Medicaid and Welfare, and take a look at the issue from a personal viewpoint.
Suppose you were employed for many years by a corporate giant who started you at a moderate salary, but gave you a 10 percent pay increase every year. After four or five years of increases -- all things being equal -- you might begin to think of them as "normal."
After you've celebrated 10 or 15 years with the company -- and every year, like clockwork, you were given a 10 percent increase -- you may have concluded that the company values you an employee, and the increases were based on your productivity, value and loyalty to the company.
But, when you arrived at work today, the company said the increases this year would be five percent, not 10 percent.
No doubt some people, like the Republicans in Congress, would celebrate their good fortune in receiving the five percent "increase." After all, casting aside such things as inflation and a growing need to provide for retirement, your pay check will indeed show an increase.
Whether it's an increase or a cut is truly in the eye of the beholder.
Sincere and honest people often will disagree on important issues; that's expected. But it's not the difference of opinion that's important.
What is important is that each side make every effort to reach common ground, try to understand the other side of the issue, and not to let partisan politics keep anyone from working for the overall good of the country.
I wrote this column as a "My View" for The Hour newspaper of Norwalk, Conn., on Feb. 17, 1996. I now write my views on a wide variety of topics on HubPages. You can, too. It's easy, and free! Get paid for writing about what you love, or whatever interests you!. HubPages makes the technical part easy. Make friends and get help on its active forum. Take a quick tour to see how easy it is to get started today Click Here -- To view my HubPages Profile Click Here
PrintShare it! — Rate it: up down flag this hub
Comments
I learnt many years ago there were three way the world of you look at you.
1. the Way you see yourself.
2. The way your family look at you.
3. The way the rest of the world see you.
I guess none of three aspects will see you in the same light.
Thank you
Very true, MrMarmalade. But it surely is most important how you see yourself. If you're not happy with the way you see yourself, how can anyone else think well of you?
A budget increase that is less than the increase in the Consumer Price Increase or in the cost of providing the service or benefit is a de facto cut, in my opinion.
That's why the question is so troublesome, Ralph. Everybody uses a different yardstick. Or should I say some use apples, some use oranges.
what ralph said.
Bill ... Good column.













compu-smart says:
2 years ago
As you say everyone sees things differently and i totally agree that reaching a common ground is a perfect and only way of really settling all disputes from political, military as well as to family differences.