Rev. Jim Jones and the People's Temple: A Memoir
75
The day I met the infamous Rev. Jim Jones, he was wearing semi-opaque sunglasses and a black shirt, and he was being trailed by a half dozen or so teen-aged young men. They piled out of a wine-colored van that was painted with the words People's Temple on the side. I had been advised that he was on his way, and I had been watching for him because the church was typically locked when not in use on Sundays. The pastor of the church had asked me to take on the task because I was employed as sexton of the church and it was a Saturday. I emerged from the Disciples of Christ Church that was located within walking distance of downtown Oakland to greet him, shake his hand and show him around the building. The church was a faux Spanish colonial of large proportions that must have been built during the heyday of the Disciples denomination perhaps in the 1920's. It was large enough to have an auditorium and full stage in the basement as well as a large kitchen for parish festivities and a commodious apartment for the sexton. The sanctuary could accommodate at least three or four hundred people, and behind the altar, covered by curtains was a full-immersion baptismal font that, when in use, seemed to be a cross between a giant aquarium and a wading pool that could be entered down steps from either side. Congregants could watch the drama of full immersion baptism unfold from the comfort of their pews. As sexton, my job was watering the roses, mowing the lawn, opening the sanctuary doors on Sunday and sweeping the floors as needed. In return, I had the use of the apartment that was located near the back door of the building on the lower floor. I was also supposed to check the building once every evening by prowling the dark, labyrinthine halls with a flashlight. The floors and halls resounded with all sorts of creaky and guttural sounds, the source of which was mysterious enough to make it the least favorite of my duties.
Rev. Jones (it seems a bit odd to affix that title to his name given his subsequent history) was interested in the church in Oakland because he wanted to move his base of operations from Redwood Valley to the Bay Area. Many of his parishioners were from Oakland and San Francisco and so it made sense for him to move. He had heard of this church because it was his denomination, Disciples of Christ, and it was a large church with a dwindling membership. When I worked there the church could only count perhaps fifty members virtually all of whom were sixty or older while Jones' flock was growing quickly and numbering in the hundreds. He approached the pastor, Rev. Harold Dowler, to discuss the possibility of merging the two congregations and because People's Temple was far larger, it would essentially just absorb the smaller parish along with its large church building. Rev. Dowler proposed that the leadership of People's Temple make their proposal directly to his parish by visiting and preaching on several consecutive Sundays and then finally put the motion to a vote of his congregation.
I was not a member of the parish even though I had been hired as sexton. At the time I was a student at Pacific School of Religion, an inter-denominational seminary located in Berkeley. I was Episcopalian and had no particular interest in changing denominations. The job of sexton was posted on a bulletin board at school and I followed up because I needed a place to live. I often attended Sunday services there both because I enjoyed Rev. Dowler's sermons and because it could hardly be more convenient.
Rev. Jones was a phenomenon. All about him was a dark, flashing charismatic energy. His sermons usually focused on justice and a new day. Some thought he was a communist, but in fact he was astute politically and was suspicious of both the great economic systems and their accompanying political systems. In retrospect, I can discern that he was a forerunner of the anti-globalism movement and personified the fear of totalitarian world government. Perhaps the early phases of his ministry will ultimately be judged as prophetic. When I met him there were only the vaguest of rumors about his dark side that finally were disclosed as paranoia, licentiousness, sadism and egomania. He preached and Tim Stoen, who was one of his more influential ardent followers, preached. They were persuasive. The old folks in the parish voted. The motion was defeated by one vote.
I have thought about that one vote many times since and thought "but for the grace of that one vote, I might have been in the employ of and swayed by the charisma of Rev. Jim Jones." I could be a rotting, swelling corpse in the equatorial jungle returned to my first home.
Share it! — Rate it: up down [flag this hub]
Comments
Because I wasn't a member, I couldn't vote. I might well have voted in the affirmative, young turk that I was.
He had a nice mix, quasi-socialism, respect for all human life, antirasicm, govt FOR the people, and God. He seemed to me to have been sincere and maybe just nutzed out later on meth-type drugs.
I haven't studied the history in detail but I always attributed his fate to egoistic temptations of charisma, power and movement politics. And how those interacted with his personal psyche and the viscissitudes of history.
well, he was a charasmatic, and certainly had the qualities I like, arrogance, intelligence, wit, charm, spontaneity, passion and a genuine interest in others combined with a strong capacity for communication skills and a willingness to buck the system and just that hint of ... dangerousness.
I think power does corrupt, sadly. It's even happening to my beloved Chavez. :(
He definitely had the "hint of dangerousness". When I met him, he had a gunslinger quality in the way he moved and spoke. His preaching was like being transfixed by a cobra all the while agreeing with the message.
I admit I have dismal taste in men. Yeah, that sounds about right. :p
I've considered what I would have thought of Manson, and I don't think I would have fallen into that one. I do find him to be a compelling speaker even now though. I watched his interviews and parole hearing the other night and agreed with like 90% of it, but his lack of self-control is unappealing to me personally.
I satisfy myself by adoring my own demi-god who is not a cult leader :p and making my own mini-Fads for group fun with words and poetry.
on topic, I have a copy of "The Suicide Cult: The Inside Story of the People's Temple Sect and the Massacre in Guyana."
authors are: Marshall Kilduff and Ron Javers who are staff correspondents of the San Francisco Chronicle.
you can probably find it in a used book store - true crime, for next to nothing or I could send you. it implies the downfall was meth addiction creating delusions, paranoia and volatility.
I've listened to some of Manson's rants and he usually starts off with something semi-rational but then when he thinks he has the interviewers attention, he begins to ratchet up his insanity making more and more outrageous claims. I once took a course on prisons and visited Folsom prison where Manson was housed at the time. It was a freaky experience even being under the same roof with him.....maybe I will write that up someday for hubpages. I always wondered about women who are attracted to the "bad boy" persona....and what may be the socio-biological basis of such attraction.
By the way, thanks for the offer but I have too much to read stack all over the house as it is. Do you remember how early he started doing meth according to the authors? As I recall the events I describe were in 1973 or '74 at the latest.
hehe. oh that one is easy. rage. ;) yeah, I think there are socio-biological reasons too, psych 101 eh, the old caveman theory, women seek men whom they believe are capable of protecting them during their pregnancies and their offspring. the study suggests it's innate. but then you have to throw in environment, too and that's where I think desire for stability gets misdirected.
I hope you do write that up for Hubs, your experiences at Folsom. You have a sure reader.
I flipped through and I'd have to read it again to find out, but one chapter started by suggesting the first publicly noticeable fallout began in 1977 at the San Francisco Temple.
Meth is evil stuff. I once knew a talented guy who was responsible for organizing educational programs for talented and gifted students in the Lincoln, NE public schools. He got into meth and I lost track of him for several years but then bumped into him at a bar and I couldn't believe what a hungry ghost and hollow shell of his former self he had become.
yeah, it's a real soul-sucker. I think the lack of sleep contributes to the delusional qualities that keep people from quitting. I was personally never drawn to it, it's for people with low self-esteem, makes them feel like kingz when they are on it, and I have a remarkably high self-esteem. perhapz too high :D
however, I worked in clubz off and on for 20 years and it was certainly the DOC for most of the women there that chose the drug route. I watched it destroy hundreds of women over the years. you couldn't pay me to do it.
Fascinating story. The videos are worth watching. They capture the horror of Jamestown. Is that where the expression "Don't drink the Koolaid!" comes from?
Don't know, either from there or the practice of spiking koolaid with LSD as in the electric kool-aid acid test. The whole guyana tragedy is a parable for our times. Idealism gone amuck. Haunting images.
If intent is all that countz though, all the believers went straight to Heaven. That is what I believe anyway. Life is fleeting and generally painful, and we all go somehow in the end, but there is something beautiful after.
There is nothing wrong with wanting to believe as long as it doesn't hurt another human being in the process.
Intent is important but as the old saw goes "the road to hell is paved with good intentions". Is Bush not blameworthy for his democratic idealism and all his blarney about freedom given what has transpired? I wouldn't want to be in his shoes facing his maker.
I don't think Bush had good intent, ever. Of course, I can't judge him, but it's certainly my opinion. I think he never had an intent to do anything but line his and his cronies pockets nomatter whose blood it required. And yes, I think there is eternal answer for that too.
Somehow I think he was a creature of Cheney and his oil interests.
I tend to think that too. I do not believe Bush has the native intelligence to have engineered this on his own.
Hullo!Hullo! All this talk back, there is hardly time for me.
Very good subject.
Neither of those two gentlemen appeal to me.
Hub is great.






Iðunn says:
9 months ago
He was fascinating, although I never met him in person. I've read up considerably. I probably would have been suckered in. I'm fairly gullible at times.