They're doing it again: Phasing out the music programs in the schools
64
In an article in the Daily Kenoshan Newspaper this morning, the headline read: The Day Music Died. The ensuing article read: " According
to music teachers at the Kenosha Unified School District, School Board
President Eric Olsen has declared a total phase-out of the music
department in Kenosha to take place over five years. By eliminating
music as part of the education of Kenosha's students, a number of
teaching positions might be saved." My first reaction was: OMG, they're doing it again! Why does the music department have to save the teachers?
Kenosha's
school music program has historically been one of the very best, as far as public
school systems go. It has long been a national model, and its student
concerts are led by guest conductors of world renown. The Band-O-Rama
in particular usually sells over 3000 tickets over the weekend it is
offered. So why phase out their music program? I'm thinking: If this isn't typical of the board of education, I don't know what is.
This has been happening at high schools all across the country.
In major cities like New York, Chicago and Los Angeles, art and music
programs are all in danger of being cut. At both Grosse Pointe high
schools, in Detroit, accompanists who work with vocal music programs
are being laid off. The schools in phoenix are making major changes to all of their arts and language programs.
In addition, Boards of Education are busy closing
large schools in favor of smaller ones. Student populations appear to
be down and the economy has cut many positions to save revenue. In most
cities, the first departments to go are the
arts: art, music, photography, theater, etc. Back to basics appears to
be the most common mantra right now. This is not necessarily due to the
fact that students will get a better education, but primarily to cut
back on spending.
When I was teaching high school music in the Chicago Public Schools in
the 1970s, we went through the same thing.. There were six music
teachers in the high school were I taught, so they decided to cut three of
us. They did it by seniority. I wasn't high enough up on the list and so
I was one of the three who had to go. To save our jobs, they put us back in the elementary schools Based on seniority I "bumped"
the principal's favorite teacher. She hated me from then on. For me, it
was two years of hell while she tried to make my life miserable. I'll
never forget it.
And, most importantly, the kids suffered. They saw me once a week. The
first year, I had no office or classroom. I slung my
guitar over my back and schlept a record player and art supplies from
classroom to classroom. I was responsible for all the kids in the
school, K-8. They saw me so infrequently that they couldn't remember
what they learned from week to week. The younger ones couldn't even
remember my name.
Fortunately, the second year, they managed to give me
a classroom. I started including dance, movement, and theater games
into the curriculum. I would change the seating around and try to do
all sorts of innovative things. Better for me, but the "old school" principal didn't
approve and lowered my "superior" rating to "excellent".......still good, but I'm an over-achiever and I wasn't happy. I finally succeeded in getting
transferred back the a high schools, by getting a masters in Special
Education. There were positions open in that area.
The most important thing I took away from this situation was how much
the children need the arts and creative outlets. They were very
responsive. And some, who never succeeded at anything else, excelled
in this type of environment. One's state of mine and sense of well
being is enhanced by these experiences, enabling them to have the self
confidence to take risks and open their minds to other more academic
endeavors. I strongly believe these programs enhance our children's
lives and make them happier and better adjusted students. Will someone
please stop the madness!
PrintShare it! — Rate it: up down flag this hub
Comments
Yeah, do you believe it? What the hell is the matter with these jerks? Do you think it's a conspiracy, I mean, as you put it, a "dumbing down" conspiracy. Thanks for the comment, D
My honest opinion is each of us needs to take ownership of our education outside of the classroom. If I had relied on my teachers to give me the knowledge I have today I never would have found it until later in life. I had some good teachers in elementary and high school, but during the in between years there was a void, and it was up to me to fill that void.
I used to think there was a dumbing down conspiracy, but today I just believe people have to take ownership for what they want to learn. If the public school is not meeting your needs read books or take music lessons outside of school. Through out the history of education there has been a tendency to have students who did not achieve, and bad teachers in every century and decade.
Even back in the fifties my mom complained about a teacher not allowing her to go onto the next level of reading books because she want the class to progress "together". Even in books written in the nineteenth century we hear stories of how some teachers were not all that stellar, and some kids really did not try the hardest.
As someone who was told I could do very little by some teachers, I simply had the audacity and spunk to prove them wrong. My independent reading outside of school happened to be where I learned the most before high school, and even afterward to some extent. One must be an avid reader, go to the library often, and take enriching lessons such as music on the side.
Thanks, SP, for the really good comment. A lot of what you say is true. But, in response to you suggestion that: "If the public school is not meeting your needs read books or take music lessons outside of school" What if you can't afford to take music or art or whatever lessons outside of school? This sometimes sparks that bit of competition it might take to "seek out" on one's own.
And not every kid has the audacity, spunk, and general wherewith all to engage in independent studies. I read and wrote a lot independently as a kid, but I was always very intellectually inquisitive, especially when it came to language and the arts. But, some kids just need that push from a caring or talented teacher, or from the examples of other kids around them.
In reference to examples from other kids (above): This sometimes sparks that bit of competition needed to "seek out" on one's own. Some kids just don't have the level of maturity that you mght have had.
Hi Alek,
Honestly as someone who was a full time teacher for a few years I just saw the good, bad, and the ugly of the profession. There are many good teachers out there that encourage their kids, but I have just noticed through out the history of the world one of the first things to go in education are good programs. Some of the greatest musicians were from poor backgrounds and self taught, so to me it is totally probably to fulfill your needs outside of the public school if there is a void. I have seen many people let down via public education, so I try to build them up by letting them know they are the masters for their own education. One friend was told by his teachers he could not read, so recently I have been trying to show him that is not true. The reality is many kids will not have a good school or caring teachers, so by instilling in them that they can take charge of their own education, that is my goal. However, I suppose I just have a different take on this issue.












Dink96 says:
7 months ago
I hope this doesn't go very far. I call it part of the "dumbing down" of America. And I'll stop right there. :-)