ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

Bonuses? They're Kidding. Right?

Updated on January 14, 2012

Say What?

Twilight Zone Time!

I wasn't going to write this morning. I swear I wasn't. I have a job to finish but it can wait until the afternoon when it warms up to the temperature where I can do it. I was just going to spend the morning doing the reading that I usually do which is time consuming in itself. Then I ran across an article, cross referenced it to make sure I wasn't being misled and I wasn't being at all. Then I got to thinking that we must now be living in the Twilight Zone where things just can't really be real but they are.

Life in these United States is getting to be quite surreal under the Obama administration. I am also positive that once this little incident becomes more than a little incident, the administration will once again say, "We didn't know anything about this." Just as they didn't get us in this fix of losing $500 billion in loan guarantees when Solyndra went belly up after this administration pushed for those loan guarantees even after being forewarned that the company already had one foot in the grave and one on the banana peel. Just like Obama never used Solyndra as the platform to launch his "green initiative" promoting a fairy tale. That I am getting used to, but this sort of nonsense needs to be squished like a bug.

Of all the times to be handing out bonuses Solyndra has picked this one. They must be following the lead of the overpaid executives at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac who are also constantly at the government feed bucket. Then again, they have Obama in their corner. In court documents filed in bankruptcy court the company's attorneys propose to hand out over a half a million dollars in bonuses to "key" executives in order to keep them in place. Now mind you, these are probably the same people who were major contributors to the company going tits up in the first place. There must be some logic here. They want to keep some of the same people in place who drove the car into the ditch in the first place? Where is Bain Capital when we need them?

We're talking bonuses in the range of $10-50K for providing motivation because so many of the others caught with their hands in the cookie jar got just exactly what they had coming - THE AXE! So lets just extend the cookie jar out there one more time and see if there are any cookies left in it? If this is Obama's idea of creating a "pro-business environment" then we're truly screwed.

Here's another puzzler. If, in fact, none of the receivers of this largesse are key executives or sitting on the board of directors, who are they? The names were not disclosed in those court documents. They should be. The proposed bonuses are purportedly going to nine equipment engineers, general business and finance types and two information technology workers. Now let me see if I have this straight. All these people work for a company in bankruptcy who can't produce so much as an effective widget much less a cost competitive solar panel and they want to continue to prop it up with bonuses. The question is "who" wants that to happen? If it is this administration then that is the wrong answer. They're the ones who got us in this mess and caused $500 billion of our tax dollars to go up in smoke and mirrors in the first place.

More Money Down The Old Hole...

What's the top divvy out? $50K is supposed to go to a "senior director" who receives a base salary of $206,499. what was he directing when the balloon went up? Nice work if you can get it. Then two "senior managers" are set to receive bonuses of $30K and 32K respectively. Notice the word "senior" in both descriptions. In other words, they were there when the stuff hit the fan. So we are supposed to keep them because they are essential to this bankrupt company? My next question is crucial in all of this. And just where is this half a million dollars in largesse by a belly up company coming from? Hell, we can't even get the names of the people receiving these cookies so I don't expect an upfront answer to that last one.

This company received $500 million in federal loan guarantees two years ago and one year after receiving our dough Obama touted Solyndra as being the business model of the future. Good grief! Now understand this also. Last year the company employed 1,100 employees in the business of jousting with windmills. Today only 84 remain. So they want to take half a million dollars and spread it out over the remainder of a disaster case? I'll ask again, "Where is Bain Capital when we need em?"

Here's how company lawyers rationalized this nonsense and I quote, “Within the last few months, the debtors have experienced a serious loss of personnel, which has made the continuation of the sales process in an orderly fashion more difficult." Well DUH, they were trying to sell something that no one wanted to buy at the price they were trying to sell it for.

But wait it gets deeper. They wrote to the court that, “The further loss of experienced personnel may seriously jeopardize the ongoing sales efforts and, should it continue, require the engagement of experienced consultants at a much higher cost than maintaining the existing personnel.” There are just 84 people left on the carcass. It got worse when they contended that the bonus money “will motivate the eligible employees to work as hard as possible” to achieve a Chapter 11 restructuring plan and sale." Really? A total of 84 people are going to work that hard?

Three (3) of the employees make less than 100K a year so we're not talking about the "little people" Pelosi. Eight (8) make more than $150K base. As mentioned earlier, the highest paid widget maker makes $206,499 and his carrot is $50K. This sort of thing is amazing and mirrors the thinking witnessed during the last Fannie/Freddie congressional hearings. You have to pay for incompetence in order to keep it.

This isn't capitalism, it is crony capitalism at its sickest point. Obama knew from all reports, as did his senior advisers at the time, that Solyndra was a bad risk. They went ahead with losing $500 million of our money based upon a "green" crap shoot because it fit Obama's agenda. That's my take on the way it went down. Then he had the balls to tour the plant a year later and tell the nation that this was the future of business in America? And now they want bonuses? If that is the case folks, we're in deep kimchee without a pair of chop sticks.

As Always,

The Frog Prince

When Is Enough Enough?

working

This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://corp.maven.io/privacy-policy

Show Details
Necessary
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Features
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Marketing
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Statistics
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)