Commitalism: eco-moral capitalism and ego-moral communism

“Capitalism fails to realize that life is social. Communism fails to realize that life is personal.” –Dr Martin Luther King Jr.

“It is a strict law that bids us dance. It is a strict law that bids us distribute our property among our friends and neighbors. It is a good law. Let the white man observe his law; we shall observe ours. And now, if you come to forbid us dance, be gone. If not, you will be welcome to us.” -O'waxalagalis of the Kwagu'l


Slavoj Žižek recently asked, “What social organization can replace the existing capitalism?” But before we answer this very important question, let's get something straight: we do not live in a democracy. We live in a plutocracy: government by the rich. The corporate elites have aggrandized power without political accountability, and they have been using capitalism as a means to achieving this end for the past four decades. But instead of being subservient to capital and simply existing to serve the interests of corporate power, we need to discover a new way of relating to money, power, and the politics that arise from social relationships (How to get Power over Power). We should be able to transform our conception of what a genuine democracy could be like with a re-appropriation of the concept of community.

My proposal of Commitalism is one possible answer to Žižek's question. I propose it as a vehicle toward a unique cultural transformation and genuine democracy. Essentially, commitalism is a combination of eco-moral capitalism and ego-moral communism. By eco-moral I mean holistically conscious and compassionate. By ego-moral I mean holistically individuated and ethically motivated.

Commitalism combines the “heart” of communism with “the balls” of capitalism. It grounds the self-expansion and grandiosity of traditional capitalism by implementing spiritual and ecological principles of interdependence (Sumak Kawsay: good life) and then advocates for a non-selfish society through the act of reciprocity and expiation (potlatch/gift economy). It also tethers the wishy-washy Utopian grandiosity of communism by empowering individuals to be productive through imaginative social expansion (Eco-moral Tribalism) and creative mini-revolutions that keeps its “bottom-line” in a constant state of renovation. Also, commitalism strategically branches off from communism (which has left a “bad taste” in the mouth of social theorists and philosophers since it's supposed failure), but still subsumes communism's long, historic struggle.

At once ethical and spiritual, at once personal and social, commitalism is less about production that caters to materialism and consumerism and more about creative expression that benefits the spirit of the people and ushers in a constantly evolving zeitgeist (spirit of the times). It is less about “to each according to need” and more about “living simply so that others may simply live.” It is less about capital, and more about respect for what is borrowed. It is less about ownership, and more about relationships.

Commitalism is a specific stage of economic and political development that emerges from a social construct that is in need of equilibrium. Its basic tenet is economic moderation and political reciprocity as pertaining to social relationships involving power and authority. Commitalism smears the black and white economic divide into a gray-washed social system of checks and balances. It does this, mainly, through the concept of Capital munificence (or hero-expiation), an eco-moral tactic emphasizing expiation and the redistribution and reciprocity of wealth. Capital munificence is a branch-off of the Native American tradition called the potlatch. It calls for a renovation of the potlatch idea, a post-modern potlatch that emphasizes philanthropic sacrifice and celebratory redistribution of immoderate wealth; not with the motive of pity, but with the motivation of festivity and a healthy mockery of power.

Some ideas are more difficult than others.
Some ideas are more difficult than others.

If we wish for our economic system to be the foundation for a healthy and vibrant democracy there must be a healthy sense of civil disobedience. Commitalism embraces this idea by allowing for a platform where individual common heroes can pay tribute to the “common” people through expiation of their immoderate wealth and also by paying homage to both nature and psyche through the healthy mockery of immoderate power. Plato said it best, “For a state in which the law is respected, democracy is the worst form of government, but if the law is not respected, it is the best.”

Our current plutocratic regime has led to self-interest, over-consumerism, ill-discipline, and a general lack of humility because it hasn't been checked and balanced by the people who uphold it. “The people” are made up of unique individuals, all of whom are responsible for their own power. The key to re-appropriating the “spirit”, pneuma, of democracy, and preventing those that uphold it from sliding into tyranny and power-mongering, is to set up internal checks and balances. Capital munificence achieves this balance on both individual, collective, and ecological levels. It relieves physical burden (immoderate wealth) as well as the psychological guilt associated with money, while directly benefiting the function of the multitude, all while maintaining an equilibrium with the immediate environment by consuming less and respecting more the natural cycle of the biosphere.

Changes for the better should never be a goal of perfect conception, but an advancement from misconception to ever more refined misconception. Thus commitalism embraces the concept of fallibilism as its philosophical foundation. Indeed, as a foundation for a refined democracy to grow from; one that isn't tainted by its power-mongering, evil step-sister, plutocracy. "Like toddlers and tyrants we are quick to take our own stories for the infallible truth," writes Kathryn Schulz, "and to dismiss as wrongheaded or wicked anyone who disagrees. These tendencies are most troubling for the way they fuel animosity and conflict. But they are also troubling because they make it extremely difficult to accept our own fallibility.” We need a system with a dynamic, relationship-based economics that strives for harmony and balance; rather than a static, ownership-based economics that brainwashes and pigeonholes its people into mindless automatons who become nothing more than simple cogs in a clock that only keeps time for a select and privileged few.

There is no permanence. Everything changes. All things come to an end. Commitalism subsumes this knowledge and evolves despite it. Like Thomas Berry said, “The only viable option for the universe is for it to be in a state of creative disequilibrium, holding together sufficiently to not fall apart, but open enough to be expanding.” This is also true regarding economics and politics. The only viable option for a healthy people to remain a healthy people is for it to be in a state of creative disequilibrium, holding together sufficiently in order not to fall apart, but open enough to be expanding into ever broader horizons. Like Samuel Becket said, “Fail again, just fail better.”

A genuine politic of emancipation is possible. An authentic economics of eco-morality is possible. Capitalism without hoarding and stockpiling ourselves into power-hungry elitists is possible. Communism without sacrificing individual effort and personal ability is possible. It is possible to both respect the commons and the individuals who populate those commons. Commitalism has the potential to create this new reality, where a realm of non-state political power can be realized and therein empower the oh-so-elusive “we the people” of our mutual democratic vision.

Two thousand years of objective reasoning has led us into a cul-de-sac of possessiveness and fear. We have become a fear-based, money-based, all-consuming, mass-destructive machine aggrandized by individuals who are intent upon the pursuit of their own happiness despite the consequences. But we are not our reason alone: we are Animal; we are Primordial; we are Earth. Thus, for the sake of both psychological and ecological stability, we must bridge the giant gap between the unconscious and the conscious, between the subjective and the objective, and between nature and psyche. The responsibility is ours and ours alone, lest we continue living in a world that pigeonholes people into ignorant, caste-like, fear-based systems.

The death-throes of plutocratic-democracy are the birth pangs of eco-moral democracy. Its vehicle is commitalism. The process by which democracy becomes eco-moral will be the shift from an exploitative system to a relationship-based system of governing. It will be the shift from a politic of greed and one-up-manship to a politic of moderation and respect. This system is the new politic of commitalism.

You are my tribe, and I am yours. There is no master here. There is each of us –free. There is each of us with unique abilities. There is each of us with our own power and the recognition that if that power should ever become greater than its need, that it should be expiated; so that the tribe may continue to be the tribe, and free.

More by this Author


Comments 6 comments

Beebuzby profile image

Beebuzby 4 years ago from Delaware

Nicely thought out and written...


Lady Legacy profile image

Lady Legacy 4 years ago from Imperial

Great piece -Z-

I had a whole long thing typed up, but it didn't update, however this piece is fantastic.


-Z- profile image

-Z- 4 years ago from Everywhere, USA Author

Thanks to you both. And thank you so much for reading. Happy Xmas!


CommonlyKnownAsV 4 years ago

I am almost with you but from what I can gather, your synopsis can still accommodate the realm of personal incentive for oneself over and above ones peers. From what I understand of it, you describe a communism + capitalism that is held in check by gatekeepers of morality.

This is not a paradigm change. A paradigm change is a new domain that invalidates completely the old way and any new improved versions of it.

The way forward is to negate COMPLETELY the notion of a monetary system. A unit of exchange within the realm of so called "market" has no life coordinates or relation to the energy required for the functioning of a society and that is why it can be manipulated and hoarded (this includes gold) to perpetuate the myth of scarcity which ultimately is an elite-serving paradigm.

Think on this. There are 3 trains heading towards each other.

1. population growth

2. a technology evolution that if not now, will certainly negate the human cost per unit of energy vs automation

3. an imploding monetary system that has no choice but to create more scarcity to retain some semblance of value

Its coming. There is no escape. We will either move painfully but ultimately for our children, rewardingly into this new paradigm or our governments will take us down a rabbit hole of fiscal and military paranoia that will wipe out half of this planet just so it can reboot this flawed system of economics. But in this scenario, we wont get the biosphere to play ball for another 200 years.

So the answer really is a paradigm change in thinking. The removal of the mindset of personal incentive for oneself and replace it with a personal incentive for oneself via the society. What I do for the community I will inevitably reap the rewards for myself.

There is a way forward and it is through functional governance, but it will take maybe two generations to fulfil because our indoctrination of self has to be reset to its empathic origins.


-Z- profile image

-Z- 4 years ago from Everywhere, USA Author

I agree, V. Read my hub titled Eco-moral Tribalism as a New-world Ethic. It discusses methods of reorienting ourselves with our empathic origins. Thanks for reading!


Atul 23 months ago

Simon, You seem to be understating the satoitiun in Eritrea. I believe you are one of the Eritreans who are living in denial as a result of self underestimation to fight the dictator Issayas Afewerki along with fellow citizens to put the country out of its long lasting misery. Will need to work on its human rights record might be appropriate for America or even Britain. It is so mild. When we talk about Eritrea we are talking about young brothers and sisters confined in Iron containers buried under ground! What's wrong with you? And you talk about border conflict with Ethiopia and our history with Britain ? are you serious? Are you telling me Issayas is dismantling Eritrea because of the border conflict with Ethiopia? or our history with Britain? Man uo and know the real issue in Eritrea brother! Don't try to find someone to blame. You know the problem is Issayas Afewerki and his unprecedented ruthlessness. Have a focus and try to put your people before your loyality to the Dictator!

    Sign in or sign up and post using a HubPages Network account.

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked. Comments are not for promoting your articles or other sites.


    Click to Rate This Article
    working