hubber scoring appears to be Subjective with little to no connection to Writing Quality Time to take hp to the task.
lets assume that the US government had good intentions when developing social programs for the people and the country. But, at some point in time, the intention failed.
See the comment field for the number of countries that have high speed trains.
NETFLIX has changed over the last few years, and in my opinion not for the better. Read the article for the reasons why I made this statement.
People and Countries had different definitions of War and how to determine whether, the War was won, lost or tied. This article defines Winning a War as preventing future wars.
What rules have been broken, and why aren't they used to justify Draconian measures.
Who still believes in the Russians had anything to do with Hillary Clinton losing the presidential election?
How can Hillary Clinton, Democrats, Clinton Supports, and the DNC support two Contradictory Views. Won the popular vote lost the election?
There are no facts proving the Russians influenced the election, but there are many facts proving that HRC and the DNC did influence the 2016 democrat primary.
Does hp give contextual feedback for their flagging, termination and removal of a question, hub or hubber?
I put this hub in this category because it is about politics and it is about a perceived bias. Please take the poll, thanks.
I will say that Bill Clinton, and Both Bush Presidents were really bad, but they were way behind President Barack Obama for the Title of Worst US President
This article will show why even though you thought we won wars, we really didn't win them. The wars that we didn't totally lose, we just deferred it causing the next war.
Just using the facts that we know of 911 we can conclude that the air defense of the Uninted States didn't play any part in stopping the attack.
Democrats and Republicans are like oil and water, they don't mix well.