To insist on Ezekiel’s temple being erected in the millennium, with the re-introduction of animal sacrifices, Levitical priesthood, circumcision, separation of Jew and Gentile, is beyond the pale.
In my opinion, many scholars have misconstrued Isaiah 14 and Ezekiel 28 in an attempt to explain the origin and character of Satan.
On numerous occasions, I have read articles and heard sermons proclaiming Jesus was smitten of God. After investigation, I was shocked to discover the opposite was true!
Did the 1st century Church hold the same beliefs about the Resurrection and the Day of the Lord as mainstream Christianity today?
Although 'The Revelation' is the last book in the Bible, it does not mean it was the last book written. It is important to take this into consideration when studying the 'last days'.
There are many theories as to the identity of Babylon in the Book of Revelation. The Lord expected the 1st century Church to understand the Revelation, so why should it be so difficult today?
Are you 'rapture ready'? Paul told believers to wait diligently for the 'day of the Lord', which is the return of Christ. Why, if he believed the 'rapture' would occur seven years earlier?
Jesus preached the Kingdom of God was 'at hand' 2000 years ago, did He get it wrong? Of course He didn't! The Kingdom has come and Christ is on His throne. So why do many today teach otherwise?