ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

6.5 Mag Quake Falls within Predicted Window

Updated on May 22, 2014
retrojoe profile image

Has studied astrology/historical seismology since the late '70s in San Francisco. Published in the ISAR International Astrologer in 2012.

Significant earthquakes (as determined by the USGS) for August 2012.  The blue highlighted quake fell within the predicted window (the source below gives it as a 6.5 magnitude quake).
Significant earthquakes (as determined by the USGS) for August 2012. The blue highlighted quake fell within the predicted window (the source below gives it as a 6.5 magnitude quake). | Source

When I first published this hub on August 22nd, it looked like it would turn out to be a slow month, but things heated up after that. Before that period there were just two significant events in the mid 6 magnitude range or higher. There was a 7.7 magnitude earthquake off the coast of Russia, not too far from Japan, but only its size made it a significant event (it was located so deep within the earth that it did not cause significant damage or produce any casualties). The other event left a much more destructive mark. On August 11th, there was a shallow quake reported as either a 6.4 or 6.5 magnitude event which produced a 6.2 or 6.3 magnitude aftershock shortly thereafter. Although its size wasn't as significant, it caused the death of over 300 Iranians.

What makes this quake even more interesting was the fact that it fell within the only earthquake window that I defined for that month as likely to produce an earthquake of 6.5 or greater. The location of the quake was not correctly predicted but that is likely at least 4 times harder to pin down than successfully predicting a time of occurrence.

Just before this month I had lowered the bar from 6.7 to 6.5 as the lowest magnitude event to expect within my defined window. That effectively increased the chances that a quake will fall within a proposed window since there are normally 2 or 3 quakes of 6.7 or greater per month and about 4 per month for 6.5 or greater quakes. In the future I plan to lower the lowest magnitude of predicted significant events to 6.4 (this would double the chances of a quake occurring within one of my windows or the likelihood of 5 quakes of 6.4 occurring per month instead of half as many for 6.7 or greater quakes). I should point out that by lowering the magnitude threshold, it doesn't necessarily increase the significance of my results (there will be more quakes falling outside of the windows as well as inside of the windows).

One of the reasons why I wish to include lower magnitude quakes is because of an official decision related to how earthquakes would be recorded from 1990 forward at data centers responsible for calculating and recording seismological events. From that year on, the official method of determining the size of an earthquake became the Moment Magnitude scale or Mw. That method of measure was created to more accurately determine the strength of quakes above 7.7 on the older Surface Wave magnitude scale or Ms.

Apparently, for reasons of uniformity, it was decided to start recording all new events as low as 4.9 magnitude using the newer method. However, even though it can be shown that Ms and Mw magnitudes average out about the same down to about 6.2 magnitude, the difference between the two scales is often 0.1 to 0.3 of a magnitude at variance, especially in the mid 6 range. As an example, USGS/NEIC had 6.7 Ms as the tentative value of the 8/11/12 Iranian quake for a few days before they settled on 6.4Mw as the official figure. Below 6.2 magnitude quakes measured using the Surface Wave method (Ms) become significantly higher when converted to the Moment Magnitude (Mw) scale. Notice how the series of earthquakes per year in the 6.2-7.7 magnitude range increases noticeably in the 1990-2010 period when compared to the earlier period (see chart below).

Since, after researching the subject, I have concluded that such differences are common, I have chosen to make my predictions specifically address events of 6.4 magnitude (Mw) or higher. This is mostly due to my belief that many earthquakes determined to be 6.4 magnitude in size could be argued to be higher, perhaps as high as 6.7 when the events are not recorded by detectors within a few hundred miles of the epicenter. In a normal month one would expect 4 quakes of 6.5 or greater. As it turned out (if one counts the Iranian quake as being one of 6.5 magnitude) there were 6 quakes ranging from 6.5 to 7.7 falling within the last 2/3rds of the month. That is 50% more than usual and the Iranian quake falling within my only window for the month amounted to 1.3Xs more than the expected likelihood.

Another interesting seismic event of note was what occurred in southern California on August 8th, 2012. On that date there were two 4.5 magnitude events separated by about ten hours. There was also a 4.5 magnitude temblor in Coalinga two days before this. This reminded me of a 5.4 magnitude shock that I felt in San Francisco at 1:15am, PDT on August 8, 1989. It originated about 60 miles south of there, in the Loma Prieta area of the Santa Cruz Mountains. Ten weeks later occurred the 6.9 magnitude quake in the same location, causing much death and destruction in the San Francisco bay area.

Because of this recent series of events, and also my belief that seismic activity should increase over the next four months, as well as the fact that southern California is often on my list of potential locations of at least one event of 5.4 magnitude or higher during that period, I would prepare myself for such a possibility if I lived in that area.

Significant earthquake activity in the southern California area for August 2012.
Significant earthquake activity in the southern California area for August 2012. | Source

My seismic windows within which there should be an increased chance (related to astrology) of a 6.4 magnitude or greater earthquake (5.4 or larger in the US) occurring for the month of September, 2012, are as follows (the dates in parenthesis are of earlier significant quakes that relate astrologically to the new predicted date in the same epicenter area):

September 5th (0900 UT +-45hrs) Possible location of event= Turkey: Ayvalik, Izmir (October 15, 1883) at 0100 UT on September 5th or Philippines: Mindanao (March 31, 1955 and November 11, 1921) at 0700 UT on September 5th or USA: California: Hayward (October 21, 1868) at 0700 UT on September 5th or USA: Virginia: Giles County (May 31, 1897) at 1000 UT September 5.

September 18th (6pm UT +-78hrs) Possible location of event= Peru: Lima, Callao (October 29, 1746) or Iran: Tabas (September 16, 1978) at 2100 UT on September 17th or USA: California: Santa Barbara (August 13, 1978) or USA: western Nevada: Cedar Mountain (December 21, 1932) at 1600 UT on September 17.

October 1st (6pm UT +-42hrs; begins on September 30th at 0001 UT) Possible locations of event= Venezuela: Cumana (December 14, 1797) at 1500 UT on September 30th or Italy: Avellino, Napoli (December 4, 1456) or Algeria: Oran +Spain: Cartagena (October 9, 1790) at 1730 UT on October 2nd or USA: Colorado: Denver (November 8, 1882) at 2330 UT on October 1st.

If 5 quakes of 6.4 magnitude or higher occur within September 2012 (a typical number based on a statistical average), it would be normal for 2 of those quakes to fall within the above described windows. What I am expecting would be at least 3 such quakes to fall within the windows (or at least 1.6Xs greater than the statistical average).

Copyright © Joseph W. Ritrovato

California map that demonstrates the intensity of the recent earthquake storm or swarm near the southern California town of Brawley.
California map that demonstrates the intensity of the recent earthquake storm or swarm near the southern California town of Brawley. | Source

Update for August 31, 2012

Well, it turns out that the 6.5 magnitude quake that fell within my predicted window for August (most sources give 6.4 but it is debatable) was 1.3Xs more than expected for any 4 day period during a 31 day month with 6 quakes of 6.5 or greater (which is 1.5Xs the usual monthly amount). The first seven months of the year have been average for quakes in the 5.0-5.9, 6.0-6.6, and 6.7 or greater earthquake ranges, but in August, although the first two lower magnitude ranges were average, the 6.7 or greater quakes were 1.6Xs more numerous than average. If one looks at just the three 7.3 and above quakes that occurred in August (which normally happen about twice during a three month period) their frequency was 4Xs the expected average (or 7.6Xs what would be expected in an 18 day period since they were clumped together within that range). I'm expecting this last trend to continue into the next few months of this year, with the three stated ranges of magnitude becoming more like 1.5Xs the average frequency of occurrence.


This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

Show Details
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)