ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

Able Archer 83: The Forgotten Close Call that Almost Started World War III

Updated on July 16, 2016

If you're a student of world history, there's a fairly good chance that your textbooks described the Cold War and the doctrine of mutually-assured destruction in great detail. For a period of roughly 40 years following World War II, the Earth's two major superpowers, the United States and the Soviet Union, existed in a period of varying degrees of political hostility that were largely kept in check by the fact that both sides possessed enough stockpiles of nuclear weapons to completely annihilate the other side before their own stockpiles could be destroyed. This ensured that an all-out war between the two powers would result in both countries being completely wiped out, along with most of human civilization on the planet. You've also likely heard it said that the event in which the two powers came closest to an all-out war was the Cuban Missile Crisis, in which a fleet of American naval vessels blockaded the island of Cuba in an attempt to prevent its nuclear armament, and squared off with Soviet ships in a tense standoff in the Caribbean Sea.

An argument can be made, however, that an even closer call occurred in early November of 1983, when NATO forces engaged in a ten-day military exercise during a period of very strained relations between the two superpowers. The realistic nature of the operation convinced some factions in the Politburo that it was a ruse designed to provide cover for an actual first strike. In response, Soviet forces put their nuclear arsenals on high alert and made their own preparations for a preemptive strike. With all of the forces of both alliances in readiness and a series of misunderstandings dictating events, it is likely that a single additional misstep on the part of either power could have resulted in total nuclear war.

Reagan and Andropov
Reagan and Andropov

Background

The early 1980s were a time of great tension between the United States and the Soviet Union. The newly elected Reagan administration oversaw the largest peacetime military buildup in the history of the United States, while the ascension of KGB chairman Yuri Andropov to the office of General Secretary brought with it a new era of paranoia regarding geopolitical developments. By late 1982, it was all but accepted that the policy of d├ętente was over. The United States began to engage in psychological warfare operations, in which they would use naval vessels to access waters close to vital Soviet military infrastructure without being detected as a sign of strength. The Soviets shot down a Korean airliner carrying a number of Americans over the Sea of Japan when it strayed too close to their airspace.

Perhaps the moment of the greatest escalation of tension on the part of the Soviet Union, however, came in late September of 1983, when their orbital missile early warning system detected the launch of an intercontinental ballistic missile from the United States aimed at Russia. The warning and a subsequent one later that day were found to be due to computer errors, but the discovery did nothing to ease the fears of the Soviet military that an attack was imminent. Consequently, they ramped up their attempts to try to detect it as well in advance as possible.

Soviet intelligence agents had, for some time, been monitoring the American military figures and facilities in charge of initiating a nuclear attack through clandestine agents in the United States. This effort was known as Operation RYAN, and its goal was to attempt to determine the likely intent of a nuclear attack, in order to give the Soviet Union the most amount of planning time possible. Of particular note were the operation's directives to its agents to not offer subjective analysis of the events they were observing, only to report events as they were occurring. This would become very important later.

NORAD control center
NORAD control center

Able Archer Begins

Exercise Able Archer 83 began on November 2, 1983 as a test of NATO's Command, Control, and Communications procedures during a nuclear war. The personnel in charge of the United States' nuclear arsenal, along with the military command infrastructure, ran through a series of simulations in response to a hypothetical first strike from the Soviet Union as if they were genuine, including the raising of the nation's alert status through each of its levels, from DEFCON 5 to DEFCON 1.

The simulation struck the Soviet Union as being frighteningly authentic. Already operating in a state of heightened readiness, the Politburo took note of the fact that the simulations included the use of coding and encryption that had never before been openly deployed on the military's communication channels. Not helping matters were the Soviet agents operating in America and other NATO countries, whose reports of heightened activity and readiness on American military bases convinced their superiors that the bases had been put on tactical alert.

The Soviet Union, not willing to take the chance of being attacked, readied its own nuclear arsenal. Nuclear capable aircraft at Soviet military installations in Poland and East Germany were placed on high alert status, and CIA analysis indicated that ICBM silos were also prepared for a launch. It became clear that many among the leadership of the Politburo genuinely believed that Able Archer 83, if not itself a precursor for an attack, was a smokescreen to provide cover for an actual one, and were one misunderstanding away from launching a nuclear first strike of their own.

Aftermath

The end of NATO's Able Archer exercise on November 11 brought with it an abrupt end to Soviet fears of an attack. The Soviet Union officially disavowed knowledge of the operation, and word of how close the world came to an all-out nuclear war only came to light later, through Soviet double agents who relayed the information to their American counterparts. Once it did, it reportedly profoundly affected President Reagan, who took away from the incident a realization that the leadership of the Soviet Union was genuinely afraid of the United States and its military buildup. The administration altered its stance with the Soviet Union shortly thereafter from a policy of confrontation towards a policy of rapprochement. It was arguably this shift in diplomacy, along with the ascension of Mikhail Gorbachev to the post of Secretary General, which eventually eased relations between the two superpowers, and brought about the dissolution of the Soviet Union.

Comments

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment
    • profile image

      Jayden 

      4 years ago

      Smkd-acab what I was looking for-ty!

    • Anonemuss profile image

      Anonemuss 

      8 years ago from Belmont, Massachusetts

      Great work on this hub.I particularly like how you focused on the "behind the scenes" action and provided information normally not taught.

    working

    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

    Show Details
    Necessary
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Features
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Marketing
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Statistics
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
    ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)