ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel
  • »
  • Education and Science»
  • Colleges & University

How Do the U.S. News College Rankings Compare to Other Best College Lists?

Updated on September 22, 2011

After being asked recently to write an article on the top colleges in the United States, I became intrigued by the system of college rankings. While the U.S. News and World Report has long been regarded as the gospel of university rankings, it appears that in recent years they have undergone a bit of criticism regarding both their criteria and results.

Opponents of the U.S. News Report claim that the ranking methods are altered every year in order to change the rankings and thus sell more copies. Other critics contend that the U.S. News rankings do not accurately reflect quality of education, but rather size of endowments and name recognition.

Many colleges have publicly objected to the U.S. News rankings, including those who have typically scored well over the years. The list includes Reed College, Stanford University, Mount Holyoke College, St. John's College and MIT.

Does the U.S. News ranking system really provide a good measure of college performance?
Does the U.S. News ranking system really provide a good measure of college performance?

U.S. News Alternatives

In recent years, a host of other organizations, such as Forbes and the Princeton Review, have come forward with their own rankings lists. In addition, international rankings which include U.S. universities provide another alternative to the U.S. News list.

Each of these sources uses a different methodology to evaluate academics and education. Some place a higher value on student satisfaction, while others are more concerned with faculty credentials and production. Yet interestingly, the majority of these rankings seem to be listing the same schools in the top spots, just in different positions. Rather than an increasingly diverse educational listing, the big names are simply jockying for the coveted first through tenth place finishes, with a few sleeper candidates thrown into the mix.


Just out of curiosity, I decided to see just how U.S. News stacks up to the rest of the pack. Since no ranking system, as of yet, has emerged as the prime competitor to U.S. News, I compiled a combined average of major rankings groups excluding U.S. News.

By assigning a point value to each placement in the top 20 on one of ten lists, I came up with an overall score for each school. The schools that rose to the top were ones that consistently did well across the board. The ranking community outside of the Times generally seems to be able to come to a consensus on who the best schools are.

The following ranking lists were included in the average:

  • Forbes
  • Wall Street Journal
  • The Center for Measuring University Performance
  • Times Higher Education (THE)
  • Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU)
  • Washington Monthly
  • The Consus Group
  • Ordo Ludus College Rankings
  • Newsweek
  • The Global Language Monitor

And the results are...

Top U.S. Colleges by Average Ranking Compared to the 2011 U.S. News Ranking

Average Rank
U.S. News Rank
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Stanford (5)
University of Pennsylvania (5)
University of California - Berkeley
California Institute of Technology (7)
MIT (7)
California Insutiture of Technology
Dartmouth (9)
University of Michigan - Ann Arbor
Duke (9)
University of Chicago
University of Chicago (9)
University of Pennsylvania
Johns Hopkins (13)
Washington in St. Louis (13)
Brown (15)
Cornell (15)


  • The U.S. News rankings seems to have a large amount of ties. The numbers after the school name refer to their rank with ties factored in.
  • All of the schools on the combined list, except Williams and Dartmouth had a top twenty rank for at least six of the ten rankings included in the average.
  • Williams and Dartmouth each scored in the top twenty on four lists.
  • Close finishers for the combined list: Amherst, Cornell and the University of California - San Diego.


    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • profile image

      Ken 3 years ago

      Please visit my blog and click SEASONAL SOUVENIR to join free and your will receive a wemolce email with your personal reflink from WAZZUB. Please send your personal reflink to endless and they send their personal reflink to as many as they could and so on till March 31, 2012, for lifetime financial freedom for free. There is nothing to loose and one should not miss it. Make sure to switch on free Wazzub Homepage on the 9th of April, 2012. God Bless

    • profile image

      Ray 6 years ago

      This is a good comilation of all the rankings - something I was desperately looking for, but could not find earlier. Hope you get more hits to your page. Please update this list as all teh 2012 rankings are out now. Thanks for the good work.

    • profile image

      C Boz 6 years ago

      Hi - the "average rank" comparison is not really so useful as some of your sources -- THE and ARWU -- are for universities as a whole (i.e., not undergraduate programs) while others sources focus on undergraduate. This is why, with the notable exception of Williams likely due to its Forbes ranking, the average rank is biased towards larger universities.

    • sligobay profile image

      sligobay 6 years ago from east of the equator

      Great review of the reviews Anaya. I always enjoy the big University comparison with smaller colleges and universities. Thanks.

    • Anaya M. Baker profile image

      Anaya M. Baker 6 years ago from North Carolina

      Fay - I totally agree! For me personally, small class size and a helpful administration are huge indicators of quality. There's nothing I hate more than going to a school office and having the person behind the desk bark at me for my social security number without even glancing up.

      I think that whole endowment question is part of the reason that the U.S. news rankings are getting so much flack these days. It does tend to skew the numbers away from who has the best educational experience to who has the biggest pockets. To argue the flip side though, having more money means more can be spent on programs etc. But personally I'd rather have the end result measured, how successful programs actually are than how much the school has to spend on them. Money doesn't always buy quality, especially when those in charge are out of touch or lacking vision, practical know-how, etc.

    • profile image

      Fay Paxton 6 years ago

      The rankings are always fun to look at, but I think they include things that don't calculate in what's important to me. For example, the amount of money the school has is not that important to me. On the other hand, I would be interested in the percentage they give to students.

      I enjoyed your hub.