ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel
  • »
  • Education and Science»
  • Geography, Nature & Weather

Microsoft Virtual Earth 3D vs. Google Earth

Updated on May 11, 2014

Google has created many interesting programs and Google Earth is definitely one of them. But it seems Microsoft has an answer - Microsoft Virtual Earth 3D.

Microsoft Virtual Earth 3D is better in some regards than Google Earth, and worse in others. Virtual Earth 3D is visually definitely very impressive. Running directly in the browser Microsoft currently feature 15 cities (like Seattle, Boston, Atlanta and San Francisco) in 3D, but not the Google Earth type 3D, fully texture mapped 3D direct from the server. Virtual Earth's building detail is a lot finer than Google Earth's (see videos). When it comes to touring abilities Virtual Earth is better, but when it comes to search and other functionalities (saved searches, various layers, flexible interface...), Google wins.

In general, Google Earth, especially the pro version, is still more mature than Microsoft Virtual Earth, which is still in beta. But the competition is definitely something we users will get most out of it.

You can dowload and try Virtual Earth 3D here. (free download)

You can get Google Earth here.

Screenshot from Virtual Earth 3D
Screenshot from Virtual Earth 3D

Microsoft Virtual Earth 3D

Boston in Google Earth

3D New York - Virtual Earth 3D


    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • profile image

      Carlo 7 years ago

      Google Earth is definitely faster than Microsoft

    • Misha profile image

      Misha 9 years ago from DC Area

      I have google earth on my machine for quite some time. May be I should give Microsoft a try :)

    • profile image

      mak khan 10 years ago

      no comment very nice