ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

Playing the Race Card!: A Brief Editorial

Updated on December 14, 2016
wingedcentaur profile image

The first step is to know what you do not know. The second step is to ask the right questions. I reserve the right to lean on my ignorance.


Thank you, slappywalker, for your question: What is the difference between 'playing the race card' and calling attention to racial injustice?

Where to begin? Where to begin?

For the purpose of clarity, let us agree to confine ourselves to the United States of America as our conceptual testing area. So, we will discuss what the difference is between 'playing the race card' and calling attention to racial injustice in the United States. In some ways the results of our inquiry should generalize all over the world (I'd be surprised if it didn't); but in some ways we might expect to find differences upon examination.

At any rate, the United States is what I know best, so, if you don't mind, I'll try to tackle your question from that direction.

Step One

You know, slappywalker, whenever I am confronted with a question like this, the very first thing I like to do is to subject the terms to a kind of linguistic analysis. In other words, in examining the question of what the difference is between 'playing the race card' and 'calling attention to racial injustice,' we can learn a lot by simply examining the very words themselves. You see, words do work; and we can avoid a good deal of heavy lifting if we simply take what they give us.

Okay, here's what I mean.

'Playing the race card.' We have in this phrase the words 'play' and 'card' (short for cards). The analogy which suggests itself is one of 'playing cards' or 'playing a card game'---one of race of course.

Since people 'play cards' for fun, recreation, and sport (which is to say professionally), we are talking about a 'game.' A 'game,' by definition, is less of a serious endeavor, especially when laid side-by-side, as you do slappywalker, with 'calling attention to racial injustice,' which is, presumably, more serious work.

In one respect, then, it would appear that to 'play the race card,' means to use 'race' in a less than totally serious, 'playful' way---we must understand that I use the word 'playfully' with qualification.

Step Two

When one 'plays the race card,' one is extracting A card of 'race' from a larger 'deck of cards' of something else, X. We do not know what X is. We do not know what the 'deck of cards' is, if you follow me. We only know that in that deck of cards, whose composition we do not know, there is at least one 'race' card.

Step Three

We have established that there is at least one 'race' card in a deck, and that one can 'play' it. Since we are talking about a 'deck of cards,' we can surmise that two or more people are 'playing cards.' Remember we do not know what the 'deck' is or what the 'game' is.

Step Four

Of course, its plain to see that we're not really talking about playing some kind of 'card game' with a literal 'deck of cards.' The 'deck' and the 'game' are metaphorical substitutions for something else.

Step Five

Let us say that the 'deck of cards' is really, say, the discussion of some public policy issue. And let us also say that the 'game' is a discussion or debate among two or more people.

Step Six

So we have a discussion or debate among two or more people, about some public policy issue. For the purposes of discussion, slappywalker, let us assume that you are one of those participants. Let's say that you and two others are debating a public policy issue. The 'card game' is on and each of you is 'holding a hand.' Follow me?

Its your turn, slappywalker, and after you've made your move, one of the 'players' bang the table indignantly, pointing an accusing finger at you, and says: "No fair, you played the 'race' card." Oh! Oh! slappywalker. It would appear that, suddenly, you have done something wrong; and the very nature of your transgression says something profound about the 'card,' the 'deck,' and the 'game' you're playing, does it not?

There is a 'race card' that one is not really allowed to play.

This is not unusual, of course. The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees freedom of speech, on a more or less unlimited basis. But it does not guarantee unlimited protection of speakers from the consequences of unrestricted use of its privileges. Donald Sterling is paying the price for what many people refer to as his various racist remarks.

It looks like he is going to be forced to sell the Los Angeles Clippers professional basketball team. The NBA, as a community, has apparently decided that they can no longer abide his association with the league in any way.

Side note: Donald Sterling's remarks were racist but he did NOT play the race card. In fact, one such as he CANNOT 'play the race card.'

What am I talking about?

Donald Sterling is a rich, white man in the United States of America (where we are confining our discussion to, remember); and as such, he can say racist things but he is, indeed, constitutionally (I'm using the word in an existential not legal sense) not able to play the race card.

In the United States of America, only 'people of color' can 'play the race card.' 'Playing the race card' is understood to be something that only black and brown (African-Americans, Hispanics, Indigenous-Americans, Asians, etc.) do and are capable of doing.

Playing the race card is understood to be the act of 'making everything about race.' This is seen as a desperate tactic of racial self-pity; it is understood to be rather a kind of 'cheap ploy,' if you will, of going out of one's way to lay a guilt trip on white people. It follows from this that 'playing the race card,' in the context of a discussion of some public policy issue, is seen as the illegitimate insertion of race.

'Playing the race card,' then, is seen to be a tactic---illegitimate though it may be seen---of the 'underprivileged' groups (though people who make the charge of 'playing the race card,' probably do not acknowledge that there are any relatively disadvantaged communities, certainly not 'racial' ones).

Now then, Donald Sterling cannot play the race card. As I said, he is a rich, white man in the Untied States of America. As such, he sits on top of the heap in both class and race terms. Actually, he is privileged in class, race, and gender terms, is he not?

Step Seven

I think this is a good place to define the term racism, which is not very well understood in the United States.

If you stopped ten people on the street and asked them to define the word, in most instance at least nine but frequently all ten, would give you an answer that equated racism with bigotry and prejudice, and they would be wrong. They would be wrong because this is NOT how social justice activists use the term.

When we use the term 'racism' or 'racist,' what we're really talking about is institutional racism.

Let me put it this way.

Donald Sterling's derogatory remarks about black people were racist because, as a white American, he belongs to the 'racial' community in the United States, which can translate white anti-black bigotry into African-American political, economic, social, and legal misery. This is the institutional racism focus that I've alluded to.

For example, when black people are inordinately targeted by police departments for their 'stop and frisk' searches, we would call that racist---institutionally racist. By the way, institutional racism, it is understood, can be operable within institutions where not a single member of said organization is a racist.

Even if black police officers participate in 'stop and frisk' shakedowns, which inordinately target black and brown persons, the practice is STILL institutionally racist. Furthermore, even if and when the occasional white person is 'swept up' in the gears of such practices, the practice is STILL institutionally racist.

So, to be clear---Donald Sterling's remarks were racist because he is a white man in the United States of America. In this country the power structure is still most controlled by white people----and a small slice, rich, Christian males within that community. Since this is the case, the white-controlled power structure has the ability to turn anti-black and -brown prejudice into rules, regulations, restrictions, and the like that make it harder for people of color to find a nice place to live, get affordable housing, get an education, or a good job. Follow me?

Step Eight

If someone like, say, Magic Johnson, said such things about white people, it would be unfortunate, ugly, mean, downright un-Christian, shameful, and all that good stuff. But his remarks would NOT be racist.


Magic Johnson is an African-American; and as such, he belongs to a community that has no control of any of the power levers of this country, which could be used to translate any black anti-white animus into public policy consequences that would lend themselves to white misery. Okay?

He would be guilty of prejudice. He would be guilty of bigotry. He would be guilty of hatred and bitterness. But because of the relative POWER position of both whites and blacks, he is incapable of racism.

How about the 'race card'? Would Mr. Johnson's remarks fall under the category of 'playing the race card'?

Well, maybe not if Johnson's remarks took the form of a generalized rant.

Step Nine

How about this?

Suppose a group of us were talking about healthcare policy, the relative merits or lack thereof, of what is called 'Obamacare.' Suppose somebody said that the United States would never effectively deal with this issue until we deal with the centrality of race to this issue.

Would she be guilty of 'playing the race card' If she is a working class black mother of two, with a father who's not in the picture, going to school to better herself at night, and as for work she's self-employed if she's lucky? Would she just be shamelessly fishing for self-pity?

But what if she had enough of a sense of American history to point out that President Harry Truman had proposed universal healthcare in 1946; and that the reason it was defeated was due to southern Democrats who were still fighting the Civil War, and therefore did not want the policy passed for fear that black people would benefit as well?

That sounds like important historical perspective to me. So you see, slappywalker, one man's 'playing the race card' is another man's 'calling attention to racial injustice.'

Thank you for your time.


    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • wingedcentaur profile imageAUTHOR

      William Thomas 

      14 months ago from That Great Primordial Smash UP of This and That Which Gave Rise To All Beings and All Things!

      @Mr. Ronnie wrenchBisquit!

      How's it going, man! First of all, let me apologize for being so late in getting back to you.

      Secondly, let me thank you so much for your kind and generous remarks about my essay.

      Thirdly, let me say that I understand your remarks about what is typical, here on HubPages. Of course, a certain close-mindedness is common to the entire Internet, is it not?

      There is something about the anonymity that the Internet provides---if one wishes---that unleashes tidal waves of vitriol. People give up reading newspapers and books (and barely recall how to source such works when writing a paper or something.)

      The Internet is ALL for some people and it shows. And, of course, the Internet is the place where reality-shoppers from all sides of the political spectrum, can find the "truth" that suits them.

      Well, thanks again, wrenchBisquit. I have enjoyed commiserating with you.


      William Thomas (wingedcentaur).

    • wrenchBiscuit profile image

      Ronnie wrenchBiscuit 

      14 months ago

      This is a great article. It's fascinating how ignorant many white racists truly are. And if "big daddy oreo" is a person of color, then he would have made a good replacement for Samuel Jackson in the Quentin Tarrantino movie "Django". This respondent was obviously offended and butt-hurt by your analysis. His ignorant remarks are common here on Hubpages, which seems to have an abundance of racist Americans who long for the glory days of Bull Connor. But I find it quite amusing that their castle made of sand is beginning to crumble right before their very eyes. You presented an article that demonstrates intelligence. However, after nearly a year since posting this essay you have one comment that accurately illustrates the average racist IQ , which doesn't exceed 95. I am certain that if you posted an essay condemning Black Lives Matter this page would be full of back slapping commentary. And so, the lack of response to such a well written and informative article is just as telling as the one stupid response.

    • profile image

      big daddy oreo 

      3 years ago

      Thank you Rachel Doezel for showing the world that it is possible to change your skin color to black.

    • wingedcentaur profile imageAUTHOR

      William Thomas 

      3 years ago from That Great Primordial Smash UP of This and That Which Gave Rise To All Beings and All Things!

      Thank you for your views, big daddy!

    • profile image

      big daddy oreo 

      3 years ago

      I guess what I am trying to tell white people is just have some white people go undercover as black men and let them handle the black issues.

      Why not send a black face cop to go after trayvon martin, michael brown etc.

      why not use black faced bosses and teachers to tell black people to work harder.

      If white people don't listen to my idea they will continue to be hustled by racial politics.

      if white people use my idea they will have the race issue under control.

      Black person sues you for discrimination use a black faced lawyer defend you.

      read the book black like me. A white man went under cover as a black man. So did robert Downey Jr in tropic thunder.

    • wingedcentaur profile imageAUTHOR

      William Thomas 

      3 years ago from That Great Primordial Smash UP of This and That Which Gave Rise To All Beings and All Things!

      "big daddy oreo," whoever you are, you have an admirable sense of irony.

      Be well. :)

    • profile image

      big daddy oreo 

      3 years ago

      I am going to change my skin color from white to black first chance I get. Then I am going to joke around with my black friends that they can not pull the race card on me cause I am black.

      from there I am going to be an going to tell white bosses they can get more productivity out of black employees by using black faced bosses.

      I also think america needs an all black face law enforcement team.


    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

    Show Details
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)