ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

Putting Atomic Bombs To Good Use

Updated on April 29, 2015

The morning of 16th July, 1945 was a morning like no other for on that morning, at 5:30am, mankind successfully unleashed the destructive power of the atomic bomb. Codenamed Trinity, this bomb was a fission-device which was detonated on a remote corner of Alamogordo Airbase in New Mexico, by scientists working alongside the Manhattan Project; the plan to create an atomic bomb before the Germans could. The explosion was so intense that being at the centre of it would of being equivalent to been dropped into the sun.

Humanity's first atomic explosion
Humanity's first atomic explosion

Since that period of time, the threat of nuclear annihilation has been a real possibility, with the two main superpowers of the time, USA and USSR at times coming close to actually launching a nuclear attack on the other. The closest of such times was back in October 1962 when the US president John Kennedy and his administration discovered the soviets were placing nuclear weapons in Cuba and as such, gave the Soviets a 12 day deadline to remove the missiles, else USA would launch a nuclear attack on USSR. Needless to say, global disaster was narrowly averted.

What most people don’t appreciate through is that just as atomic weapons could be the destroyer of mankind and most other species on the planet (except cockroaches!) they could also be used to lift humanity into the next stage of human evolution. By this, I mean enable us to become an interplanetary species by colonising other parts of the solar system – and even travelling out beyond our solar system to some of our nearest interstellar neighbours.

This may sound rather far-fetched but is completely true. Since the 1950s, scientists working on Project Orion discovered that it was indeed possible to propel a spacecraft using a series of atomic explosions, to distances way beyond that which even current day space technology can achieve. Headed by physicist Freeman Dyson and Ted Taylor from General Atomics, it was discovered that it would have been possible to reach the Moon in hours, Mars in a few days and the outer edges of the solar system within a month. And in theory it would of being possible to reach Alpha Centauri, our nearest star within 60 years.

Project Orion Starship

Artists impression of Orion Spaceship
Artists impression of Orion Spaceship

So what happened? Why aren't there highways within the solar system – spaceships flying in-between all the various planets and moons within the solar system, transporting cargo and passengers to cities, etc. on other worlds? Although it gained lots of support in the 1950s, support turned against the project when people began to consider the fallout effects that these ships would produce. For effectively one is detonating a series of atomic explosions, one right after another. Whilst in space this wouldn’t have caused any harm, no major world power wanted to be the one to build such a ship and launch it from their country. If you’d ever seen the old films of rocket test launches from the 1950s, you’d seen the damage a normal chemical rocket can do when things don’t go according to plan. Make that a nuclear powered rocket, and you’d end up with a 10 mile wide crater where the ship once stood, and a continent completely contaminated with radioactive fallout.

Despite the heavy risk involved in such technology, I personally believe that it was wrong for humanity to give up on the development of nuclear powered spacecraft. Whilst it is still true that launching a nuclear propulsion rocket from the surface of the Earth would be a very foolish thing to do, the technology does exist for building such a craft in space. Like the international Space Station, there is no reason why our governments can’t use a fleet of space shuttles to carry components of the craft into space, where it would be assembled up and ready for launch. By doing so, we could launch the craft off as a spacecraft to take humans around the solar system. A roundtrip mission to Mars could occur in days rather than weeks, and as it is in space the destructive fallout from the atomic explosions wouldn’t affect life on Earth in anyway at all.

So why isn't this being done? In my opinion this is the million dollar question. We have lived with the threat of nuclear annihilation for over 70 years, it is about time that we (and our leaders collectively) stopped playing stupid games and started using atomic weapons for the benefit of all mankind. As a species, we are playing a very risky game if we decide to confine ourselves to this one planet. Through environmental damage, viral outbreaks, asteroid impacts, super volcanic eruptions, etc. it will only be a matter of time before life on Earth will become very difficult. As such, the sooner we as a species can spread ourselves out amongst the rest of the solar system, the greater our chances of survival. Whilst it would be a terrible shame if all life on Earth were to be destroyed by an asteroid impact, it wouldn’t be so dire if a decent percentage of humanity were living on the other planets in the solar system, in self-sustaining communities.

So what is preventing us humans from achieving this? The answer in my opinion can best be summed up as the will and lack of forward planning by our leaders collectively!

If our leaders could work together, we could soon be an interplanetary species
If our leaders could work together, we could soon be an interplanetary species


    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • maxoxam41 profile image


      3 years ago from USA

      Then it will be accidental but not the fruit of our restlessness. But, again, where are the Copernicus, Galileo, Tesla of our time? How is it that they are so good to refine weapons of mass destruction whereas in matter of protection, development and evolution we are at a standstill?

      And, have you ever asked yourself who would decide who would go there, which criteria would be applied... In a vote concerning another of your hub, as I voted, a hundred per cent of the voters stated that if they had the choice they would live on earth versus the cosmos...

    • gaddie profile imageAUTHOR

      Alex Gadd 

      3 years ago from Great Missenden

      Interesting food for thought. I think either way we need to leave the Earth one day for it won't remain like this forever. Two supervolcanoes going off at near same time or asteroid impact could spell end civilisation for us.

    • maxoxam41 profile image


      3 years ago from USA

      Given the risks, I will disagree with you. We won't travel in space for its beauty, but to conquer. And, where would be the point? To install a deleterious "civilization". We proved our planet that we were not worth its power. We are giving power to psychopaths that experienced an affective lack in their childhood to govern us. And what is the result? We bomb Nagazaki, Hiroshima, Yemen, we leak radioactivity in the Pacific Ocean and probably any body of water in the vicinity of a nuclear plant...

      The earth has plenty of safe energy (implying the sun for instance). In a time where Copernicus developed heliocentrism, with our level of technology, why our research and development departments are under financed? Why is the military budget the only one taken into consideration?


    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

    Show Details
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)