ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

The Nature of Reality, Prologue 2, If there is a God…

Updated on February 2, 2015

How Ptolemy saw the Universe

Ptolemy saw the universe as a series of perfect crystal spheres. The Bible claimed 300 years earlier that the universe was flat and stretched out. In the 1940s Hubble proved it was stretching out, and in 2003 the WMAP proved it was flat.
Ptolemy saw the universe as a series of perfect crystal spheres. The Bible claimed 300 years earlier that the universe was flat and stretched out. In the 1940s Hubble proved it was stretching out, and in 2003 the WMAP proved it was flat. | Source

Syncretism in the Protestant Churches

If there is a God then we need to deal with those issues of syncretism within the church also. Why do many of or theological points come from the Greeks? But that is not directly the point of this series.

We protestants are known for pointing at the modern syncretisms of the Catholic church (that is, taking up beliefs and practices of other religions in other parts of the world) but we tend to ignore the fact that it was the government of Rome that syncretised Christianity with its Greco-Roman philosophy in the fourth century, and protestants took most of that syncretism with them in the Reformation. This was the real issue with Galileo, they believes the Greco-Roman model of the universe propounded by Ptolemy. This was not a Biblical model at all or in any manner. Keep reading this series to get specifics.

The following was written when I was an Adjunct Professor in a major university in the College of Sciences in November of 2007, and chief scientist on multiple investigations. It has been edited and amended several times to prepare this for publication.

It was written in response to certain arguments presented at the Evangelical Philosophical Society Annual Apologetics Conference, November 15-17, 2007, in San Diego, California.

Several philosophers there presented worldviews that were an admixture of Christian and Naturalistic worldviews, but not one knew they had mixed the two models of the universe, but none were actually naturalists. At least several of these philosophers had mixed different cosmologies together without realizing it.

The Bible Analogy of the Universe

The Biblical analogy of the universe is like a tent of that period, flat and stretched out.
The Biblical analogy of the universe is like a tent of that period, flat and stretched out. | Source

My response

Naturalism falsely claims that the only things that are real are things we can in some way measure, or sense. Einstein shaped his theories on this worldview, which resulted in the rejection of the ether theory (that there was some kind of invisible mass that all the physical things in the universe effortlessly pass through), resulting in his famous formula (E=MC2) to miss 95.44% of the mass of the universe, and he knew this before he died, his theory could not be applied directly by astronomers because of this fact.

The best data we have is from Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe, or “WMAP,” and indicates the total amount of matter/energy in the Universe in the form of Dark Energy is 72.8% of its mass (within 1.6%) then add the matter found as non 'particle' background matter or Dark Matter comprises 22.7% (within 1.4%) of the non-baryonic 'particle' energy, (what we understand as mass and energy are all classes as Baryons, you might add leptons or hadrons).

What we see as mass, that is all the things Naturalism and Scientism assumed were all that exists, is comprised of several classes of baryonic particles, a.k.a. atoms, and comprises only 4.56% of the mass of the universe and this data is accurate within 0.16%. (Author’s Note: Understand that this means Einstein in writing off Lorentz’ luminiferous aether missed 95.44% of the mass of the universe. Lorentz was right.)

One problem with naturalism is that it ignores by explaining away the metaphysical things we clearly see around us.



Now don’t go all flaky on me. I strongly resist mysticism of all types including those I see in local churches.

By “metaphysical” I mean, all things not physical, such as personality and mind, thoughts and ideas, first principles and abstract thinking, which naturalism, being that it is a theory, actually is metaphysical itself. This is an irony since its claim, if true (“there is nothing but the physical, i.e., nothing metaphysical”), would have prevented the theory. If it were true there would be no minds to notice it. The argument destroys itself, ergo, is absurd ab initio.

The Christian worldview that these good gentlemen from the Evangelical Philosophical Society missed, is one wholly derived from the Bible, and not syncretized with the Greeks. I argue that is the only way it ought to be derived if it is to be called “Christian.” However, all too many Christians I have spoken to have worldviews which are cross contaminated with non-Christian thinking, as they did at the above referenced conference resulting in contaminated theories and discussions and conclusions.

It is time for a second reformation, which, in my view, is already underway, and, it is fraught with pitfalls and perils as we move from the old base to an uncertain future.

This is not an attack on those older views per se, simply a correction of the error, because that is what rational thought is always about, correcting error and right thinking.

Fundamentally Different

There is a fundamental difference in how each of these worldviews were developed and a fundamental difference in their resulting models of the universe. The naturalistic scientific model (not the only scientific model) actually started long ago and can be seen in ancient Greece philosophy. The Christian view ought to be wholly developed from the Bible. I mean, isn’t that the claim, that the Bible is sufficient to give use big answers to big questions? Isn’t this a communication from God?

Forgive that little jab, but before you go off with a false view, I am a Christian who believes the Bible, in its original form is without error, and the versions we have today are close enough to that, that is, translated close enough for 99% of people to read and understand as-is without anyone explaining it to them. There are cultural issues that need some explanation, but that is easily handled.

I believe this Christian worldview, i.e. as described above, wholly derived from the Bible is the correct one and answered questions about the universe two to three thousand years before “science” found out they were true.

There can be only one correct view of objective data. However, every Christian and religious denomination and every individual tweaks his or her view a little, and the farther you are from that full set of facts, the correct model, the farther you are from the truth, and the farther away you are from understanding the real universe.

Yes, I believe in the traditional concept of the Trinity, as-is. It is a logical necessity considering the truth of the Bible, and explains man and his complete self, condition, and situation better than any other view of man.

That must raise your interest, and suspicion. . .

This is the first in a series of articles on the Nature of Reality.

Why is there real beauty in the world?

Click thumbnail to view full-size

More Metaphysics

I mentioned metaphysics above, but do not thing we will start with some non-verifiable junk thinking about the mystical reality of some spiritist nor the magic of naturalistic science where everything sprung from nothing for no reason and without purpose.

Pop! Magic, it is just here.

No, we are going to look at what we see, when humans experience, and what a reasonable explanation is for the various thing we experience is.

To define what everything is actually, surely, and categorically like we need to start and the very beginning, the very basics of what reality is like, those things we experience at the most basic levels, and that does not necessarily mean it will be hard but I can guarantee that you have not heard these things before because I know no one who has elucidated them previously, and least not in any coherent manner and not in one location.

This is the Nature of Reality.


Submit a Comment

No comments yet.


This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

Show Details
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)