ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

The Reports of California's Demise have Been Greatly Exaggerated

Updated on September 30, 2013
retrojoe profile image

Has studied astrology/historical seismology since the late '70s in San Francisco. Published in the ISAR International Astrologer in 2012.

7.8 magnitude events or larger in the world from 1900 to the present (the 1906 San Francisco earthquake is now considered to have been a magnitude 7.7 event).  The largest historical earthquake in California is one of 7.9 magnitude in 1857.
7.8 magnitude events or larger in the world from 1900 to the present (the 1906 San Francisco earthquake is now considered to have been a magnitude 7.7 event). The largest historical earthquake in California is one of 7.9 magnitude in 1857. | Source

"You can not change the laws of physics Captain!" -Scotty

There has been lots of talk lately in religious circles that the end is near for much if not all of California. The doomsayers tell us that a huge 9.7 magnitude earthquake will strike off the coast of California, destroying at least San Francisco and flooding the Central Valley. And we don't have long to wait. This is prophesized as going to occur in the Day of our Lord, Thursday, October 3, 2013.

Now I am technically not a geologist or a seismologist, but I know a thing or two about both fields. I will not say that a 9.7 magnitude earthquake is not possible. It may be. But if it is possible it, like the top five recorded earthquakes that have been studied since 1900 that were 9.0 to 9.5 in magnitude, it would have to happen on a fault in a subduction zone and San Francisco is not situated in such a zone.

It is true that the California coast is along the "Ring of Fire" which circles the Pacific Ocean, and that around 90% of the worlds largest earthquakes occur along that ring, but those are almost all within subduction zones. The area on or near the coast of California, rather than having the ocean floor dipping beneath a continental plate (as is the case in a subduction zone), has instead two plates moving very slowly together in opposite horizontal directions (or are locked and shift during an earthquake from side to side). These type of faults are strike slip faults and the size of an earthquake along such zones can be no larger than 8.7 in magnitude. The reason for this is because these type of faults can't build up as much stress as a subduction zone fault can. Actually, the largest earthquake ever recorded along a strike slip fault was an 8.6 magnitude one in Indonesia on April 11, 2012, but that one ruptured four separate faults simultaneously and for the very first time (it may never be as big again in the same spot).

Although in theory it may be possible for an earthquake as large as an 8.7 in magnitude to occur in California, the next great quake would most likely be in Southern California, not in Northern California, and not off the coast, but inland where two major faults coincide. Both faults would have to rupture together to produce a quake over 8.0 magnitude in size. The largest quake in the historical record, estimated using the current moment magnitude standard of measure, is 7.9 for a quake in Southern California in 1857. The San Francisco earthquake of 1906 was once thought to be as strong as 8.3 in magnitude but using the new measurement methods it is now considered a 7.7 magnitude event.

In closing I wish to stress that even though an 8.7 magnitude earthquake may be possible on the type of faults that relate to most of California, the size of The Big One in Los Angeles most likely would be no larger than 8.3 in magnitude (under perfect storm conditions where three faults would give way simultaneously). Seismologists have recently expressed that an 8.1 magnitude event in Southern California could be caused by the combined effect of two faults rupturing together.

So is there going to be a catastrophic earthquake in California on October 3, 2013? Although I see a possibility of an 8.0 magnitude or larger event occurring during the last three months of 2013, I would most likely expect it along a subduction zone and not in California and not on the 3rd of October, 2013. In other words, don't hold your breath and don't bet on it.

California earthquakes of 7.2 to 7.7 magnitude from 1900 to the present.
California earthquakes of 7.2 to 7.7 magnitude from 1900 to the present. | Source

Comments

Submit a Comment

No comments yet.

working

This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

Show Details
Necessary
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Features
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Marketing
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Statistics
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)