ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel
  • »
  • Education and Science»
  • History & Archaeology

The part played by the failure of Tsardom in causing the February Revolution in Russia in 1917

Updated on April 25, 2014

The Last Russian Tsar

Tsar Nicholas II and the royal family. Later all killed by the Communists.
Tsar Nicholas II and the royal family. Later all killed by the Communists. | Source

Introduction

The February Revolution in Russia in 1917 was set off by a number of events and causes, most of which were direct consequences of the Tsarist rule in Russia at the time. The revolution was spontaneous and a collaboration of strikes, military mutinies and also the abandonment of the Tsar, Nicholas II, by the elite. However it was not only the actual revolution, which led to the total annihilation of Russian Tsardom. Tsarism encompassed absolutist and autocratic government, which exalted one person to the statue of a god – the Tsar. The Tsar’s use of this unlimited power led to devastating consequences, which in turn led to the February Revolution in 1917.

The Revolution

The People protesting n the streets against the Tsar.
The People protesting n the streets against the Tsar. | Source

Cause of The Feb. Revolution

The February Revolution in Russia was ignited by many causes. In addition, most of these causes were even present before the uprisings in 1905. As these issues worsened the Russian people and army revolted against their Tsar. During the 12 year between the two revolts tremendous urban and rural discontent was present. This discontent had been building up since the violent suppression of peaceful protests in 1905, the low productivity of the agricultural sector, the lack of political progress through the Duma and food shortages across entire Russia. Hunger and suffering were omniscient. The Duma, a kind of National Assembly/Parliament, failed in achieving any greatly beneficial economic, social or political changes, except fundamental civil freedoms, such as the freedom of speech and assembly. The Tsar, through his autocratic rule, however often violated these civil freedoms. Another cause for the revolution in 1917 was the Third Section, a type of secret police initiated by the Tsar, which was known for its brutality and injustice. The overall mood of dissatisfaction, cause by these long-term issues, was bolstered shortly before the outbreak of the Revolution. Because of the immense war failure, many mutinies occurred, both on the front line and in cities. The entire population of Russia had lost faith in the Tsar due to this failure during the war. An additional short-term cause was the presence of Rasputin in the royal court of the Tsar. Although Rasputin allegedly cured the Tsar’s son’s hemophilia, his presence was unpopular with the people of Russia, due to allegations that he was having an intimate relationship with the Tsarina. All these cause lead to certain events, which triggered the national revolution. Dozens of strikes in main cities, such as Petrograd and Moscow, and thousands of mutinies along the front line of the war occurred. These thousands of people striking turned into a full-blown revolution forcing the Tsar to abdicate.

Total Oppression

The Russian population was greatly oppressed by the Tsar.
The Russian population was greatly oppressed by the Tsar. | Source

Tsardom's Role

Tsardom played a huge part in causing the February Revolution in 1917 in Russia. Tsarism encompasses autocratic rule, which is predestined to fail. Its main tool was force. The Russian imperial army often brutally suppressed any upheavals, such as in 1905 and the case of “Bloody Sunday”, where the Tsar’s men slaughtered peaceful protesters. The militarism of the government and the presence of the Third Section created huge urban discontent, while food shortages and many unsolved peasant issues generated rural discontent. Tsarism also allowed for the monarch to possess massive personal wealth and estates larger than whole countries. This made the Tsar oblivious of the reigning poverty in rural areas. By 1912 the Tsar only possessed military force, which created even larger dissatisfaction with this rule. By 1917, as the war effort was drastically failing, Tsardom had lost its main instrument – the army. Even the elitist imperial guard, the Cossacks, changed sides. In addition, the Tsar insisted on Rasputin’s presence, although this angered many people. Additionally, the lack of political progress and rising political awareness of the masses constituted important reasons for the Revolution. Nicholas II and the Dumas failed to create a meaningful land reform and to sustain his rule peacefully.

Lenin

Lenin - The next leader
Lenin - The next leader | Source

Summary

Tsardom was greatly to blame for the February Revolution in 1917. Nearly all cause or the uprisings and strikes, both long and short-term, descended from the Tsarist rule of Nicholas II. The Tsar failed to implement any changes between the uprisings in 1905 and 1917, while his nation was starving and his army losses territories in the First World War. Furthermore, Nicholas’s insufficient leadership and military rule evoked hatred and the wish for change in Russia’s people. The autocratic and absolutist government of Russia at the time was the main reason for its downfall and the abdication of Tsar Nicholas II in February 1917.

Tsardom's Fault

Do you believe the Tsarist regime was to blame?

See results

An Interesting Movie

Russia Today of impressive size.

Comments

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • profile image

      Robert 3 years ago

      The overall argument is strong but there are a lot of mistakes in your facts: The fact that Rasputin was having an affair with the Tsarina did not upset people, it was that Nicholas II was on the front lines and Rasputin was influencing court politics that was upsetting people. The Cossacks were not an elite guard, the elite guard would be the Preobrazhensky and the Semenovsky companies. Cossacks were more like mercenary or hired secutiry forces. They lived outside of the laws of the Tsar at the price of being his strong-arm when needed.

    • Mathewson profile image
      Author

      Andro Mathewson 3 years ago from Germany

      Thank you both Carolyn & Made. Made, I have read a lot about the Fino-Russian war all is very interesting and I believe it was a very nice thing that Finland gained independence!

    • Made profile image

      Madeleine Salin 3 years ago from Finland

      As a Finn I should know more about this. In 1917 Finland became an independent country after the revolutions i Russia. Interesting hub!

    • CarolynEmerick profile image

      Carolyn Emerick 3 years ago

      Great analysis of the situation leading up to the fall of the Tsar. Upvoted and shared with my hub followers :-)