ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel
  • »
  • Education and Science»
  • History & Archaeology

A Bridge too Far- The Battle for Arnhem

Updated on March 12, 2015

To me, this is one of the best historical war movies of all time. Not for the special effects or even for the acting (though both are superb) but for the story it tells, the desperate Battle for the bridge over the Rhine at Arnhem in Holland.

I was stationed in Germany not long after the movie came out and remember one day talking with a mate in my unit who told me that he'd actually been involved with the filming of the movie. Alfie was an ex tank driver and one day he was asked if he knew how to drive a Centurion tank. When he said yes he found that the next day he was being sent to Holland as the film crew there had six Sherman tanks they were using for the movie and the Sherman had the same cockpit layout as the Centurion. He drove one of the six tanks they used (all the rest were Landrovers with cardboard cutouts making them look like Shermans)

I first saw the movie not long after it came out in 1978 and what a treat it was. instead of the typical war movie that made out how great the allies were or how stupid the Germans were this was a movie that told the truth about one of the most important Battles of the second world war.

A few months later I got the chance to visit the place. I walked into a bar (wearing an American Army combat jacket) and before I could order a drink a beer appeared in front of me. Being a soldier I downed it and tried to find out who was buying. I was told 'It's our way of saying thank you!' (I was only 18 at the time) I pointed out that I'm not American but British and was told 'we're still saying thank you'

There are few movies that can cstay true to the real events yet make a good story. This one doesn't make a good story. It makes a great one! Following the battle as it unfolded it tells the real story of the Battle from planning of the Battle to the final events as the airborne units pull out having pushed that 'Bridge too Far'

It's by far one of the best movies about ww2 and the one that tells where the reputations of the Airborne units were forged. Well worth watching over and over again.

A Bridge too Far had an all star cast including Sean Connery. Dirk Bogarde, Micheal Caine, James Caan, Ryan oNeal, Elliott Gould, Richard Attenborough, Robert Redford and Gene Hackman

This year it will be seventy years since the Battle for Arnhem took place. Many of the soldiers who fought there are no longer alive. But their legacy lives on.

The D. Day invasion was a spectacular success and the Allies had by now rolled all the way across France. They were virtually at the western banks of the Rhine. Germany's natural defense in the west.

But the allies had a major problem because since DDay they had not taken one French prot intact and the only way for supplies to reach the front was through the portable and (what was originally planned as temporary) port that they had built in Normandy some three hundred miles from the front lines. Their supply lines were stretched and vulnerable.

Just ahead lay the port of Antwerp (in Belgium) and a possible gateway into the heart of Germany itself. The door was open to finish the war by Christmas 1944 but what was needed was an audacious plan.

Field Marshal Montgomery (a notably cautious soldier) came up with a brave plan to parachute three Airborne Divisions along a line that would sieze all the bridges over the main forks in the Rhine delta.

The American 101st Airborne and 82nd Airborne would have the task of seizing the bridges along the way as far as Njemegan but the British 1st Airborne division was given the task of seizing the final bridge at Arnhem.

Along with the airborne drop the British would drive an armoured column (XXX corps) to smash their way through to Arnhem thus opening the way for other armored units to follow through and roll on into the Ruhr region, the industrial centre of Germany and the heart of the Third Reich itself.

What they didn't know was right at that time two SS Panzer divisions were re-supplying in Arnhem and the Germans were ready for them.

The plan was for the armour to take two days to reach Arnhem. But it took nine for them. the famous 2nd Battallion of the Parachute regiment did take the Bridge, but they were cut off from the rest of the Division and held out for four days before finally being overrun by the 10th Panzer division.

Nine days after the start the armoured column did make it to Arnhem but only able to evacuate the airborne units as pull back as far as Njimegan.

Some interesting facts about the battle and the movie

(1) The Bridge was so badly damaged in the Battle that it had to be rebuilt. the Bridge that was used in the movie was actually the next Bridge (A Bridge further on) The Bridge in town now is called the "John Frost Bridge" after the commander of the company who captured it.

(2) The Paras HQ was totally destroyed in the Battle but there was a twin building that was used on the movie It now houses the Arnhem Museum Here is their website

(3) Sherman Tanks Only six Sherman tanks were used. All the rest were Landrovers made to look like Shermans (long before the days of CGI)

(4) Dakotas The DC3 was the workhorse of the Allied airforce and there are still many of this graceful old bird still flying. They only used a few for the movie with British decals on one side and and American ones on the other.

show route and directions
A markerArnhem -
Arnhem, The Netherlands
get directions

British 1st Airborne division were given this task

B markerNjemegen -
Nijmegen, The Netherlands
get directions

Arnhem was the target, clearing the path was the US 101st and 82nd Airborne divisions. XXX corps would race through the corridor they opened up.

Operation Market Garden

The plan was simple and yet daring. Montgomery (the mastermind behind the plan) wasn't known for risky moves. He was a deliberate and careful planner, yet this was a bold plan that if successful could end the war in a matter of weeks.

The march through France had gone much faster than the Allies had planned, but not all had gone according to plan/ The Germans had managed to destroy every port along the North French coast meaning that all supplies were still coming through the temporary facilities that had been shipped from England just after D.Day

With Patton's 3rd Army poised on the Rhine in the south and Montgomery closing on Antwerp and the Rhine crossings Monty planned to take the Germans by surprise and instead of heading for Antwerp to head straight for the industrial heart of Germany. All he needed to do was capture the bridges over the Rhine.

Because they were seizing the lead up to Arnhem the 101st and 82nd got the bulk of the planes for the massive air assault. The British 1st Airborne would get the rest as well as gliders for the heavy infantry, not all of the 1st Airborne could be dropped the first day so the plan was to drop them a day after to re-enforce those on the ground and drop the Polish Brigade on the third day but Bad weather on the second and third day along with a disaster with the radios led to confusion and the re-enforcements weren't sent in for nearly a week, by then the British had lost nearly 8,000 men wounded, dead or captured.

What went wrong?

Historians have asked this question repeatedly. Hopefully to help the generals to not repeat the same mistake. Here is a summary of what we know went wrong

  1. Not believing intelligence reports. Three days re the assault was launched the Dutch resistance got word out that 2 Panzer Divisions had moved into the Arnhem area to resupply. Monty didn't believe the reports that they were seasoned combat troops.
  2. Captured plans. On the first day of the assault some of the Glider troops took complete copies of the Battle plan with them. One of the gliders crashed killing all on board. A German patrol sent to investigate found the plans and immediately sent them to HQ to be analyzed. The Germans couldn't believe their luck and remembered they'd been sucker punched with false plans before, it was 24 hours before they decided they were real and began the counter attack according to the plans.
  3. Faulty equipment. It was only after they dropped in to Arnhem that the 1st Airborne realized that their radios had the wrong crystals fitted and they had no way of talking with the Allied command about the situation. By the third day their Drop Zone had been overrun and all supplies dropped from that point on were going straight to the Germans. Low on Ammunition and with no way of letting London know the real situation they fought on for a total of nine days before XXX corps reached them, it was supposed to only take two!
  4. Blown Bridges. The 101st had seized all their bridges but the 82nd weren't so lucky. As they approached the bridge at Njemegen (their drop zone was about four miles from the Bridge) the Germans blew it.
  5. Bridge building equipment. XXX Corps did have engineers to build any bridges that were damaged, but they weren't expecting to have to build them. The Armored column was rumbling along a very narrow highway that only had room for one vehicle at a time. The front of the column was Tanks punching their way through fierce resistance (also not expected) and the Bridge builders were a good five hours behind the lead tanks.
  6. Fierce resistance. The Germans weren't about to give anything up easily. Once they realized what the Allies were trying to do they threw everything they had at them to stop the attack
  7. Only one company reached the Bridge. One company from the 2nd Battalion Parachute regiment reached the Bridge and held one end against determined assault for five days.


    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • lawrence01 profile image

      Lawrence Hebb 21 months ago from Hamilton, New Zealand


      Sorry it's taken me so long to acknowledge your comment! You're right, this Battle was Monty's biggest disaster! he tried to save face with it and say that 90% of the operation was a success but the best way to sum that up was General Urquart's words (said by Sean Connery) "I took ten thousand men in, and brought only two thousand out and he calls that a BLOODY SUCCESS!!!"

      For me, when i got to the Arnhem Museum they had the last orders given by Urquart for the soldiers on display, painted on the church door it simply said "Remember lads WE BEAT THE BASTARDS!!"

      Glad you enjoyed the hub

    • Readmikenow profile image

      Readmikenow 24 months ago

      Excellent.l Really enjoyed reading it. You provided a lot of good information.

    • Paladin_ profile image

      Paladin_ 2 years ago from Michigan, USA

      I enjoy this film, too (being somewhat of an amateur historian and history buff). But I always have to fast-forward through the part where the young intelligence officer is being railroaded into re-assignment for "exhaustion" because he believes the Dutch intelligence assessments that Panzer divisions are in the area.

      For me, it's an all-too familiar situation where planners and bureaucrats are so emotionally and personally involved with their plans and schemes that they're unwilling to believe information that threatens the viability or success of the endeavor -- even if the evidence is compelling!

      It's sad that so many soldiers had to die for this scheme which, at the very least, should have been modified to not include Arnhem. Then again, knowing Monty's enormous ego (though he certainly wasn't alone in this regard), he probably wouldn't have accepted ANY variation in his plan.

      In any case, it's a good review of a good movie! (Trivia watchers will want to look for a young "Cliff Claven"(John Ratzenberger, from "Cheers") as one of Robert Redford's (Major Cook's) young lieutenants).

    • lawrence01 profile image

      Lawrence Hebb 2 years ago from Hamilton, New Zealand

      You're right there Robert. But sometimes what really makes it is the unintended things that you The times when someone walks up and says "I was there and this is how it should be"


    • Robert Sacchi profile image

      Robert Sacchi 2 years ago

      It always helps when the war film makers get consultants from both sides of the battle.

    • lawrence01 profile image

      Lawrence Hebb 2 years ago from Hamilton, New Zealand


      I had a mate in the Army who was 'volunteered' (as only the Army can) for working on the movie. He told me that when they were filming the scene of the Germans counterattacking the Bridge they had this older guy in a German officer's uniform come up and start changing where the different machine guns were. When they stopped him and asked "what are you doing?" he pointed out that at the real Battle he'd been the officer in charge of the assault and he was re-positioning the guns were! That's the kind of detail they got for the movie.

    • Robert Sacchi profile image

      Robert Sacchi 2 years ago

      Great review. Yes, it was an excellent movie, and among the best war movies. I remember when they were making the movies one of the British officers involved in the battle was talking about the movie as it was being made he said in this battle the Germans were chivalrous and he hoped they brought that out in the movie, they did.

    • lawrence01 profile image

      Lawrence Hebb 2 years ago from Hamilton, New Zealand

      Glad you found it helpful

    • profile image

      Judith 2 years ago

      I want to send you an award for most helpful inrtneet writer.