Is streaming children into different types of schools at the age of eleven,on the basis of an intelligence test, a good thing?
First response: Why? What problem are they trying to solve or what are they trying to achieve?
Second response: Is school better when students of different intelligences and aptitudes, (or even ages) are mixed together, or not?
I would say yes, it is better because school is also a place where social skills are developed. Psychologically, kids benefit by being in a body of peers. When some are singled out as more intelligent than others you are pinpointing higher and lower levels of intelligence rather than just accepting a child at whatever level he is at. In addition, in school environments where there are different abilities, ages and levels of intelligence, the older and more knowledgeable children can help those who need help to understand what is being taught.
The Way I See It
It's a vexed question with pros and cons on both sides of the argument.
A few state schools in the UK are excellent - others are poor and under-performing. Children do not have equal opportunities as they are usually compelled to go to a school close to where they live - be it good or bad. This is seen by the Prime Minister as detrimental to the outcomes of able students living is less well-off areas, because more children from good schools go on to university education than children from less good schools. She herself attended a Grammar School, as I did.
Re-introducing the selective system at age eleven is intended to allow academically bright children to attend a school that is focused on good academic outcomes but is out of their catchment area.
I've written more about the educational experiences of my family on my blog -
http://www.pensionerspages.co.uk/2016/0 … ammar.html
Okay, thanks. Maybe we can learn something from what the UK is experiencing. I think we are on the verge of a revolution in education in the US. I don't know when, though. There are many (bad) reasons to keep things mostly as they are.
by Rose West7 years ago
I've been writing an article about the government's involvement in education... It seems to me that our kids would be a lot better off if the government had never gotten involved. But what if the Department of Education...
by thaivalentine6 years ago
The average American teacher works 9 months a year, gets holidays off, receives a base salary, pension, full benefits and a job for life as a result of tenure. What you get, someone with a Masters Degree who on...
by Julia Chang6 years ago
I personally think that many use the education system as a scapegoat for their kids' general lack of interest in learning. I think it starts at home with the parenting methods and how the parents motivate and encourage...
by Bema Self6 years ago
I personally feel that to require children to go to school against their wishes or the wishes of their parents, under penalty of going to jail or losing their children, is involuntary servitude, which is prohibited by...
by myhomeworks6 years ago
The school system is so laid back. I don't see how my kids will find themselves getting equipped to face the future. So I'm snatching them away from the school and deciding to take care of their education myself. What...
by Julia Chang6 years ago
It perplexes me that despite the advent of the Internet and the quickness with which information can travel nowadays, so many young people are still so woefully ignorant of the issues that affect our society. Mainly,...
Copyright © 2017 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.