Can the sum of two transcendental numbers be a non-transcendental number?
Indeed; although I do understand this, I cannot take credit for devising this solution. However, the answer is quite simply yes. One rather ingenious method to derive this is noting that if a number is transcendental, then so is its negative. Then the sum of this, must be zero. Zero is not irrational or if you will, transcendental.
by Iamsam5 years ago
Of the three numbers, the sum of the first two is 45; the sum of the second and third is 55 and...Of the three numbers, the sum of the first two is 45; the sum of the second and third is 55 andthe sum of the third and...
by ruhisandhu3 years ago
Dufference between rational number or irrational number????
by sunnyraghvendra7 years ago
how is pi an irrational number when it can be expressed as 22/7.....22/7 is a rational number since it can be written in the form p/q.....any thought processes are welcome......
by pemekwulu5 years ago
The sum of first n Fibonacci numbers is 232. What is n? List these numbers as elements of the..Fibonacci sequence.
by Elijah A Alexander Jr5 years ago
I'm the philosophy (lover of wisdom) Elijah Alfred "NatureBoy" Alexander, Jr. with the "Pin Name" The0NatureBoy. I use the because I was required to have an alphabet first, zero because 1 plus...
by Cecilia7 years ago
Some people think that zero is nothing. I know for a fact that zero represents "cannot count". Because we create units and assign numbers to them. that is why zero=infinity.Numbers are abstracts...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.