Researches have re-run the neutrino tests trying to eliminate one of the possible explanations for their previous findings that neutrinos apparently travel faster than light.
The test was run again using much shorter pulses of neutrinos. The initial tests had pulses that lasted 10 millionths of a second, and the discrepancy was approximately 60 nanoseconds. However, 10 millionths of a second is is 160 times longer than the 60 nanosecond discrepancy, and they were using averages. This time they ran the test with pulses that are only 3 billionths of a second long, or 3 nanoseconds.
The findings were similar. Neutrinos still appear to be travelling slightly faster than the speed of light.
http://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2011/1 … ngs.-Video
One example of a team of scientists refuting the Faster-than-light(FTL) findings.
Personally, I have a problem with them saying things like 'the neutrinos should have lost energy if they were travelling faster than light', when we have 0 mathematical basis for what would happen if something traveled FTL.
Pretty exciting stuff. Unfortunately, it will probably take at least a year before we have the beginnings of solid evidence either way... this stuff takes time.
It is pretty silly to say that something should act like this if it does something our present theory says can't happen.
Judging from what I have read on neutrinos so far, if those experiments prove to be flawless, then the whole modern day foundation of Physics which embraces Einstein's theory of relativity is swept away, and scientists have a whole of re-writing to do.
Beam me up, Mr Spock!
Ps edited because my first comment showed my ignorance too much.
Well, we don't actually know if it would directly refute relativity. Relativity states that the amount of energy needed to accelerate a particle to the speed of light is infinite, so it can't be done. We can get really, really close, but never there.
So far, it seems to be very, very true. The amount of energy required to go from 99.99% of the speed of light to 99.999% of the speed of light is tremendous, not a small fraction as we would assume.
One explanation I found is that perhaps they aren't accelerating to that speed, but somehow transitioning to that speed. Imagine getting in a spaceship and starting to go a million miles an hour with no acceleration(no being pressed into the back of your seat).
Who knows though.
Thanks for responding, you sound like you know what you are talking about.
I am fascinated and watch the story with interest.
Those neutrinos travelled uninterrupted through rock? Even light can't do that!
by jomine 5 years ago
Suppose a light ray travelling near a black hole, which has so much gravity that the escape velocity is twice the speed of light, got caught in its gravitational field. Will the light travel at the speed of light or travel at double the speed of light?Similarly what happen to other objects...
by Mikel G Roberts 6 years ago
If I was on a space ship traveling at the speed of light (The natural speed limit proposed by Einstein) and I fired a gun would the bullet remain in the gun?My belief is no it would not. I believe the bullet would leave the gun at the same increased velocity that it would achieve if I had fired the...
by My Esoteric 3 years ago
I have heard many times that one reason the "inflation theory" has been challenged is the argument that is if it were true then the expansion would have to happened at a speed faster than light, in violation of the General Theory of Relativity. Given there was no matter during the...
by Aqeel Saeed 9 years ago
if it happens then just move in universe, today in ploto and the other day in other galaxy.
by andycool 6 years ago
Scientists of the world were left in shock when the world's largest physics lab announced they recorded subatomic particles travelling faster than the speed of light – a feat that Einstein said is impossible.Researchers at the CERN lab near Geneva claim they have recorded neutrinos, a type of...
by Irfan 5 years ago
Aircrafts have past the speed of sound ... do you think they will ever break the speed of light?Do you think the light barrier can be broken? ... I think it can.
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|