ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

Argo: A cosmic conflagration

Updated on January 6, 2016
Tony Mendez (Ben Affleck) © Warner Bros/GK Films
Tony Mendez (Ben Affleck) © Warner Bros/GK Films

"This is the best bad plan we have... by far, sir." --Jack O'Donnell

If it wasn't based on real events, one could say that the premise of Argo is one of the most absurd ideas ever. It had all the workings and requirements of a "bad plan", and I have to wonder how many probably laughed at it at the CIA Headquarters when Tony Mendez pitched it in. The fact that it really happened only makes it even more impressive. In a way, that reminds me of Compliance, another 2012 film whose premise might seem absurd and ludicrous at first, until you realize that what you saw on the screen actually happened.

The film follows the efforts of the CIA and the government to rescue six diplomats from Iran in the middle of the 1979 hostage crisis at the embassy. The film opens with a compelling, easy-to-follow prologue explaining the background of the political situation of Iran at the moment. I can see how some people might consider it sort of an oversimplification of things; an "Iran for Dummies", if you may. But I think it served its purpose and successfully established the environment in which the film takes place. After that, we see the riots in front of the embassy escalate until hundreds of people manage to storm inside forcing the six diplomats to escape into the Tehran streets and into hiding at the house of the Canadian ambassador.

© Warner Bros/GK Films
© Warner Bros/GK Films

Enter Tony Mendez (Ben Affleck), a CIA operative and exfiltration expert, brought in as a consultant by the State Department. As the government scrambles for possible covers to exfiltrate the diplomats, Mendez comes up with the idea of using the filming of a cheesy sci-fi film as the cover. As absurd as it might seem, Mendez worked the logistics of the plan with friend and make-up artist John Chambers (John Goodman) and film producer Lester Siegel (Alan Arkin), which includes setting up a phony production company, choose a script, design posters and storyboards, and make public script readings.

As Mendez prepares to travel to Iran, he sets up fake credentials and identities for the six diplomats, who are growing more desperate as time passes by, and the possibility of being captured increases. As a director, Affleck successfully builds a tense atmosphere around the events with a tight direction by intercutting different events to get the point that they are not safe. None of the diplomats is fleshed out enough, but still the different actors did well with what little was given to them.

Goodman and Arkin were pretty good, and played well off each other. But I'm surprised that Arkin was nominated for this. His performance, although charismatic, wasn't that impressive to me. He did have the best line of the film though ("Argo f**k yourself!"). Affleck was pretty good as well, considering that his role was more of a stoic operative, and required little emotion. But he did handle well those subtle moments of introspection in Mendez mind.

John Chambers (John Goodman) and Lester Siegel (Alan Arkin) © Warner Bros/GK Films
John Chambers (John Goodman) and Lester Siegel (Alan Arkin) © Warner Bros/GK Films
 
Argo
Release date
October 12, 2012
Director
Ben Affleck
Writers
Chris Terrio
Starring
Ben Affleck, Bryan Cranston, Alan Arkin, John Goodman
Duration
120 minutes
Budget
$44,500,000
Box office
$232,324,128

Overall, Argo is a neatly crafted film in terms of directing. Affleck manages to infuse tension in something that probably shouldn't have, considering that lots of people know the outcome. In a way, that reminded me of Bryan Singer's Valkyrie, which also had a decent amount of tension, despite the fact that we all know what happened in the end. Plus, he does so without resorting to the typical thriller clichés of explosions, shootouts, and whatnot. As the film progresses, the implausibility of all the "close calls" that the group faces start to mount, but I still found it to be effective. <SPOILERS>Even though I know it was silly, script-wise, to have the Iranians racing the plane at the last moment, I was still on the edge of my seat waiting for the plane to take off. Kudos to Affleck and Co. for that. Another small moment of "forced irony" was when they showed Sahar crossing the border to Iraq in the end. Interesting, but I could've done without that "a-ha!" moment.</SPOILERS>

In my opinion, Affleck continues to show that Affleck has the skills to be one of the best current directors. Argo might not be a masterpiece, but it was an entertaining and well crafted film. Grade: B+

 
Grades
RottenTomatoes
96%
IMDb
7.8 /10
Thief12
B+

Argo Official Trailer

Comments

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • cfin profile image

      cfin 4 years ago from The World we live in

      The movie has historical inaccuracies a plenty and has been hollywoodized, if that's a word ( it should be ). For example. They used Irish passports (a neutral country who would be overlooked) to enter Iran, not UK passports. This fact was specifically changed. I'm not sure if it was changed to hide the fact that the CIA and FBI often use Swiss, Irish and Norwegian passports to avoid suspicion, or maybe it was changed to make them look stupid to an educated viewer.

      Are we really led to believe that they would use a UK passport, knowing the tensions between these two countries. It's a very silly mistake.its the kind of silly change you really wonder about......

    • Thief12 profile image
      Author

      Thief12 4 years ago from Puerto Rico

      Yeah, I know. Also, the role of Canada was diminished to "glorify" the CIA and the US government, and so on... but from a cinematic point of view, I still think it was an effective film. Like I said, I don't think it was a masterpiece or nothing remotely groundbreaking, but I still enjoyed it, inaccuracies and all.

    • Gil Silva profile image

      Gil Silva 4 years ago from Porto, Portugal

      I love this movie. I agree with you, Ben Affleck is one of the best current directors!

    • IslandBites profile image

      IslandBites 3 years ago from Puerto Rico

      I agree with your grade. For me was a good movie, but not Oscar worthy.

    • rose-the planner profile image

      rose-the planner 3 years ago from Toronto, Ontario-Canada

      I watched Argo and I thought it was good, however, I agree that the role that Canada played during this historical event was seriously downplayed in the movie. Great article! Thank you for sharing. (Voted Up). -Rose

    • Careermommy profile image

      Tirralan Watkins 3 years ago from Los Angeles, CA

      Nice review. I really enjoyed this film and thought Ben Affleck did a great job directing. I still wish he would have at least grabbed a nomination!

    • Careermommy profile image

      Tirralan Watkins 3 years ago from Los Angeles, CA

      Nice review. I really enjoyed this film and thought Ben Affleck did a great job directing. I still wish he would have at least grabbed a nomination!

    • Thief12 profile image
      Author

      Thief12 3 years ago from Puerto Rico

      Thanks for the comments!

    Click to Rate This Article