ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

TV Viewers Can Now Change the Medium, Not Just the Channel

Updated on April 29, 2018
RDCrouch profile image

Robert currently writes from a meme-free zone about history, culture, science and technology.

When President Kennedy's FCC Chairman, Newton Minow, publicly ridiculed broadcasters for turning TV into a “vast wastleland" in 1961, there were just three TV channels. PBS wouldn't exist for eight more years, and pay cable was decades from gaining traction. A parade of saccharine soap operas, boilerplate westerns, and bone-headed shows (like Mr. Ed, about a talking horse, then in its third season) ruled the airwaves. That said, viewers in 1961 also had options like The Twilight Zone, Alfred Hitchcock Presents, The Ed Sullivan Show, American Bandstand, and news from the legendary journalist Walter Cronkite.

It's a truism that over the ensuing decades, TV accelerated in its downhill trajectory, turning from a 'wasteland' into a something more like a 'flaming cess pool'. A comprehensive list of unenlightening shows from the 1960s through the early 2000s would be an effort fit only for a flagellant medieval scribe. This was the era that brought us everything from Gilliigan's Island to Flavor of Love. (Manimal, anyone?)

FCC Chairman Newton Minow delivers his famous "Television and the Public Interest" speech to the National Association of Broadcasters, May 9,1961.
FCC Chairman Newton Minow delivers his famous "Television and the Public Interest" speech to the National Association of Broadcasters, May 9,1961.

In Chairman Minow‘s view, the medium was far from living up to its potential a half century ago. TV, he believed, had the power to change the world, whether for good or evil. The violence, sex, and general schlock on TV, as he saw it, was a direct result of the economic model of the medium. Programming was then almost solely driven by the Nielsen ratings system, in which a miniscule number of households were given a device to monitor viewing habits. Whatever the Nielsen households might happen to watch (or absent-mindedly leave on while doing chores) became highly-rated and so garnered more advertising dollars. Shows with poor Nielsen ratings, regardless of any broader value, tended to quickly vanish (except, debatably, on PBS).

Over the last decade or two, TV has been redefined by services like YouTube, Netflix, Hulu, Vudu and others. These services have the business advantage of having data on what is being watched and when, whether it is "liked”, and sometimes exactly what viewers think about content (via user comments). Though the internet is notoriuosly full of fluff and much worse, companies like Netflix have managed to leverage data and complex algorithms to eventually produce shows that have gained wide critical acclaim. In any case, it is viewers who now choose programming. They (we) have the ability to turn anyone or anything into a TV hit, YouTube star, or viral sensation.

"Television and all who participate in it are jointly accountable to the American public for respect for the special needs of children, for community responsibility, for the advancement of education and culture..."

— Newton Minow

Right now, sandwiched between Growing Pains Season 7, a cute cat video, and a disturbing conspiracy video, is a virtual Alexandrian library of visual media, for those willing and able to search for it. YouTube, for example, now offers thousands of historical documentaries in high definition (like episodes of BBC's excellent docuseries Timeline). Vimeo and Hulu are meanwhile becoming the sorts of film and television archives once found only in college libraries. Google offers access to all of this material and more, including its own enlightening "talks", through its video search.

Given the availability of so much “quality” content, the internet now has far greater potential than TV once did to "enlarge the horizons of the viewer," as Minow put it. That is, if viewers choose to view and support good content, even occasionally. Outside the shrinking Nielsen matrix, the individual viewer now has a true “vote" as to what content is propagated and subsequently, what is later created.

Consider the story of the YouTube channel ”SBSK”. Founded in 2016 by special educator Chris Ulmer, the channel, which features children and adults with disabilities, currently boasts nearly half a million subscribers. Some videos have viewcounts in the millions.

”Mr. Chris” interviews an array of individuals with diverse conditions. Some have visible disabilities that will be unfamiliar to many, and perhaps shocking to some, at least initially. Other guests have less visible challenges, ranging from Williams syndrome to Tourette's, from brain cancer to blindness or hearing impairment.

This may sound like challenging material to take in, but that is part of the point: to challenge the status quo of perceptions of people with various limitations or conditions. Here, we meet people with sometimes severe limitations who present themselves as anything but objects of sympathy or pity. Ulmer allows his varied guests to communicate to his audience in whatever way they are able to and/or wish to do. This yields a diversity of unexpected insights about varied people, not unlike the hugely popular Humans of New York photoblog. In one segment, for example, a man with autism challenges Mr. Chris to stump him in movie trivia. In another episode, we learn about the challenges of dating with a disability from a man diagnosed with cerebral palsy.

Often these vignettes are poignant, fascinating, or even downright funny, such as in one video featuring a British comedian who is nonverbal and uses a speech device to communicate his remarkably funny material. [Update: Lee Ridley coincidentally appeared on Britain's Got Talent around the time this article was originally published, garnering over a million views within a week.]

By itself, content like this is thought-provoking, educational, and sometimes, inspiring (though not always). Ulmer introduces us to one elderly woman, a Holocaust survivor with PTSD, who describes the difficulty she has had all her life being happy after her harrowing experience. But even this segment ends in a touching way.

SBSK features both children and adults willing to be honest and open about their thoughts and feelings, often answering the top questions people tend to wonder about them. In many clips, we are reminded that "neurodiverse" people simply want to engage with a broader audience or show off their skills—like any YouTuber. And that too is part of the point.

Frequently, viewers also gain practical knowledge. We learn, for example, how a man with more visible disabilities (resulting from the now-banned drug thalidomide) prefers to be engaged by others in public, beyond the really-should-be-obvious (don't stare, bully, or avoid "different" people). Content like this gives those of us who care about better treatment of disabled people a handy guidebook, among other things, without much time invested.

Because some of the individuals featured are mostly home-bound (like Eric LaGrand, a college football star who deals with quadriplegia and yet maintains the best of attitudes), it is a privilege to get to know them through the internet. Often, they share advice on the topic of accepting and dealing with challenges. Sometimes, we learn the value of simply spending time with or making an effort to befriend people with different issues, such as a charming woman with Alzheimer's.

We may be passive as we watch these stories, but we can actively "like" them, and both acts have real benefits to the content producer, given the economic model of YouTube and sites like it. Additionally, the more educated we are as a public about different kinds of people in general, the more likely we are to prevent unnecessary hardship in their lives. After all, we have all encountered someone with a diagnosis in the course of our own daily lives, whether we knew it visually or not.

Viewers of today's "TV" have an ever-increasing voice in the content creation process. As YouTube and other services become more readily available (with many new TV remotes even featuring a YouTube button), viewers in 2018 are empowered to select anything from traditional dumbed-down television shows to material of real potential value. In the aggregate, a society full of people who are better educated and who better understand the preferences and perspectives of a variety of its people seems like a particularly worthy objective, especially in the current climate of vitriol.

At a minimum, it is inspiring to think that our mere viewing of content can now produce a social good as simple a genuine smile from another person. This is something Minow could never have imagined.

© 2018 Robert D Crouch

Comments

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    No comments yet.

    working

    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

    Show Details
    Necessary
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Features
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Marketing
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Statistics
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)