ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

Cinematic Hell: When A Stranger Calls (2006)

Updated on August 20, 2016
Poster of When a Stranger Calls (2006 remake). Property of Screen Gems and Sony Pictures.
Poster of When a Stranger Calls (2006 remake). Property of Screen Gems and Sony Pictures. | Source

Honestly guys, I don't really want to waste too much time on this particular title. It's one of those stock horror remakes that came out during the 2000's. As usual, this remake sucks big balls. On the surface, When a Stranger Calls is a mundane horror remake. Almost no different than Friday the 13th (2009) and A Nightmare on Elm Street (2010). However, When A Stranger Calls (2006) is kind of special in it's own stupid way. But we'll get to the whole special bit in awhile. Let's take a look at the Original 1979 When A Stranger Calls.

When A Stranger Calls (1979)

People who remember the original film usually remember a quarter of it. Yes, the first 15 or 20 minutes of this film is quite Impressive. There's great suspense and of course Carol Kane is always a pleasure to watch. You can also tell that this movie heavily inspired the Scream movies just with that one scene. As for the rest of the movie it's pretty... blah. I mean it's not bad or anything, but after that one great scene ends this movie is kind of just a murder/mystery with some detective tracking the deranged killer down. Again, the middle of the film is just kind of mundane and not much to talk about. The last 20 minutes of the movie is pretty cool too, but again nothing really special. So I will say The Original "When A Stranger Calls" is an okay movie with a few great moments in it. Check it out if you want. Score: 6/10.

When A Stranger Calls (2006)

I still have no idea why any Hollywood producer or filmmaker would want to remake When A Stranger Calls. Friday the 13th, A Nightmare on Elm Street and even Texas Chainsaw Massacre I understand remaking. But why this movie? Yes, the original film made a profit (it only cost 1.5 Million Dollars and grossed 21 Million Dollars) but still I don't see how a remake of a movie that not a lot of people know about or honestly care about would make any money for any studio. I guess Sony didn't give a shit on that front and apparently they didn't even care about the quality of the new film. Needless to say, this remake sucks big balls. But how does this movie blow? Well... let's get this over with.

Jill Johnson (Camilla Belle) is grounded for running up her cellphone bill and her punishment is to basically be in this movie. Ok fine, her real punishment is babysitting for an entire night. She thinks she'll spend a nice, quiet evening in a modern house with electric lights and 5 remote controls to different gadgets around the house. Suddenly, Jill starts getting anonymous calls and... THAT'S IT. I'm not kidding, that's the entire movie! The entire running time of this film is some girl walking from one room to another answering the phone while the caller more than half the time says NOTHING. Yeah this job is made a whole lot easier when the film just gives you one reason to hate it's guts .

You know, this movie would be kind of bearable if there was a lot more going on like in the original And yes, I know I just kind of criticized the first film for being kind of mundane but hell, even when the film was slow it was decent. This movie is just so life sucking and boring. Maybe if Camilla Belle was able to carry this film on her own then it would be at least watchable. Now I'm not saying Camilla Belle is the worst actress ever, but obviously she can't carry an entire film on her own and she doesn't have a lot of range as an actress.

Guys, I'm sorry but I don't want to talk about this movie anymore. It offers nothing as a remake and it doesn't work as a stand alone film. It's way too boring and dim witted to even get mad at. Just stay way from it, hang up on this stupid ass movie. 0/10.

Comments

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • profile image

      Pat Mills 

      24 months ago from East Chicago, Indiana

      I was never really on board with the horror genre in the 1980s wave. There were some decent pictures, but most were about the gore than anything else. If it's gore that somebody wants, those fans should seek out the movies of Herschell Gordon Lewis. At least there's a campy comic element to those films.

    working

    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

    Show Details
    Necessary
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Features
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Marketing
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Statistics
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)