ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

Film review - The Woman in Black

Updated on February 21, 2012
The Woman in Black: a new and spine-tingling horror from Hammer Films
The Woman in Black: a new and spine-tingling horror from Hammer Films

Film work details

Title: The Woman in Black

Produced by: Hammer Films Productions, in association with UK Film Council, Talisman Productions and others

Adapted from the novel, The Woman in Black by Susan Hill, first published 1983 by Hamish Hamilton

Screenplay by: Jane Goldman

Directed by: James Watkins

Starring: Daniel Radcliffe, Roger Allam, Janet McTeer, Ciaran Hinds


Stats:

Genre: Horror/Thriller

(Age) rating: PG-13

Content for advisory: contains thematic material of a frightening nature and disturbing images


Official description:

Arthur Kipps (Daniel Radcliffe), a widowed lawyer whose grief has put his career in jeopardy, is sent to a remote village to sort out the affairs of a recently deceased eccentric. But upon his arrival, it soon becomes clear that everyone in the town is keeping a deadly secret. Although the townspeople try to keep Kipps from learning their tragic history, he soon discovers that the house belonging to his client is haunted by the ghost of a woman who is determined to find someone and something she lost… and no one, not even the children, are safe
from her vengeance.


Reviewer rating: 5 Popcorns


Reviewer summary:

The Woman in Black opens with a sweetly familiar scene of childhood play that quickly turns into a parent’s worst nightmare. The next scene introduces us to Arthur Kipps, a real estate solicitor. Kipps is also a widower, who lost his wife, Stella, who died giving birth to their son, Joseph. Grief has never left Kipps and the struggle to provide for Joseph and his nanny has made for strained relations at his job. But the firm is willing to give Kipps one more chance to prove his worth, and to this end assigns him to visit Eel Marsh House, an estate on an island in the north of England. Here, Kipps is required to handle the estate of the late Alice Drablow, who died without an heir as she and her husband’s only son died at a very young age.

Kipps sets to leave his son in the nanny's care, making plans for them to join him in the nearest village by Friday of the week. Before Kipps leaves little Joseph gives him a collection of drawings, a sweet collection of hand-drawn pictures of the week’s schedule. An image on the first day’s sheet portrays an apparently very frustrated Kipps himself, rather amusing in detail. Friday’s sheet portrays Joseph and his father, drawn together holding hands. As rushed for time as Kipps is, he still appreciates the child’s gesture, and keeps the pictures close to his heart during his journey.

Kipps arrives to the village, which is the last stop before the causeway leading to the island estate. With the exception for a landowner, Sam Daily and his wife Elizabeth, it is immediately apparent to Kipps that his presence is not wanted. This is most notable when Kipps visits the local solicitor, Jerome, for a scheduled discussion about the Drablow estate. Upon arrival, however, Jerome hands Kipps a briefcase with what Jerome claims is all the Drablow documents. Then he tries to blow Kipps completely off, even saying he’s arranged for a driver to take Kipps back to the train station. Not put off by Jerome’s transparent lies, Kipps hires the driver to take him to Eel Marsh House where he can find and examine any important papers Jerome failed to hand over.

It is here that Kipps first encounters the woman in black. The sighting of this specter, as unsettling for Kipps as it is, preludes violent and deadly consequences for the village’s innocents. The grisly chain of events that ensue are worsened for Kipps by the knowledge he has no way of contacting his son’s nanny and warn her to cancel plans of bringing Joseph to the village. But with access to Eel Marsh House’s darkest secrets, Kipps hopes to find an answer that will save all the children.

Daniel Radcliffe gives a fittingly restrained performance in The Woman in Black. Photo courtesy of IMDb online
Daniel Radcliffe gives a fittingly restrained performance in The Woman in Black. Photo courtesy of IMDb online

Reviewer comments:

Some movie watchers will probably not immediately recognize this film for what it is, for The Woman in Black is completely gutted of the cliques that saturate the typical celluloid piece that claims the horror genre. There are no torture scenes, no visually appalling disfigurements, no exploitation of religious themes, no slash-and-gore, no stereotypical rednecks, no personality-bereft kick-ass heroines and no dumb sluts sacrificed for merely not being the dumb virgin instead. Instead, the audience is given an intelligent plot and a reliance on ambiance to instill fear.

The ambiance begins with a series of startles to unrattle the audience, such as the sudden seeing of ordinary human faces through keyholes or ordinary people turning out to be that shadow behind the door. But just as the audience begins to get comfortable with the startles these dissolve into the background and are replaced by a deluge of spectral assaults. These are angry assaults, immune to all efforts to placate or soften with any conventional sensitivity.

Arthur Kipps is a character weighted down with grief and impending financial disaster. We know that whatever may come of the events in the village, there is not a happily-ever-after ending waiting for him back home. He doesn’t have the aid of a priest with a bag of magical stilettos to defeat the unholy, or the help of a stranger with a conveniently stockpiled knowledge of the occult. Heck, he doesn’t even have a magic wand and flying broom on hand. Instead, Arthur Kipps is an impoverished man with a big dose of realistic stresses most cinema heroes are never burdened with. As such he is not just a sympathetic character, but one we can identify with. And Daniel Radcliffe gives a fittingly restrained performance of this gentle hero. It is one very mature and so convincing we quickly couldn't care less about that childhood role that jump kicked this actor's career.

A final note: although several studios contributed in the making of this film, it was released under the Hammer banner. This is because Hammer used to be THE horror studio, producing way back in my parents’ day some of the most beloved horror flicks of all time. Hammer was silent for a long time, but with The Woman in Black has made a striking come back. Don’t expect the legendary Hammer campyness in this film, however, or the bosomy heroines and stream-lined storylines that helped make the studio's past flicks legendary. What this film does have is an acute awareness of what real terror is. It is a impressive way to get back into the saddle for Hammer, and one I doubt could have been accomplished with a more fashionable-conscious script.


Final verdict:

If you ruefully thought spine-tingling was forever gone, you will be happily surprised by this film. The comfort zone of predictability is denied us here in a way that is bare-bone scary. The Woman in Black, is a macabre and mesmerizing ghost story that is sure to stay with the movie watcher's psyche long after they leave the theater!

Reviewer's rating: 5 Popcorns out of a possible 5

Comments

Submit a Comment

  • MarketBOB profile image

    Craig Forgrave 5 years ago from Canada

    good to hear you liked it, although I have a fondness for the old Hammer films as well, but the brand resurgence is an interesting marketing move.

  • hoteltravel profile image

    hoteltravel 5 years ago from Thailand

    Thanks bethperry for the in-depth review. This is the type of review I would like to read before committing my time in cinema halls. Voted up and awesome. Shared as well.

  • Alastar Packer profile image

    Alastar Packer 5 years ago from North Carolina

    Glad I read your 5 popcorn review bethperry cause another reviewer on here more or less said the movie wasn't very good.

  • LisaKoski profile image

    LisaKoski 5 years ago from WA

    This is a very insightful and well-written review. I'd wanted to see this film just to see Daniel Radcliff outside the Harry Potter realm but I was afraid the film would be too predictable and disappointing. This review gives me hope that it may actually be worth seeing in theaters.

  • bethperry profile image
    Author

    Beth Perry 5 years ago from Tennesee

    Thanks to everyone who read and commented. I apologize for not being able to reply personally at this time but I have two sick young'uns right now. But bright thoughts to all :)

  • Der Meister profile image

    Der Meister 5 years ago from Virgo Supercluster

    It is a solid horror film. It is not the best in the world, but it still has its moments. Cool hub!

  • Nell Rose profile image

    Nell Rose 5 years ago from England

    Hi, I spotted this review with interest, because I am going to get the dvd and wasn't sure whether to or not, but now I think I will, it sounds really good, thanks, I am so fed up with those 'real time' ones that are about as frightening as a cup of coffee without sugar! haha! rated up! cheers nell

  • bethperry profile image
    Author

    Beth Perry 5 years ago from Tennesee

    MarketBob, thanks for commenting. May I ask what your favorite old Hammer film is? Mine is probably Horror of Dracula, though I like The Curse of the Mummy's Tomb very well, too.

  • bethperry profile image
    Author

    Beth Perry 5 years ago from Tennesee

    hoteltravel, thanks so very much :)

  • bethperry profile image
    Author

    Beth Perry 5 years ago from Tennesee

    Alastar Packer, happy to provide it. Out of curiosity, I'll have to hunt up that other review of the film now!

  • bethperry profile image
    Author

    Beth Perry 5 years ago from Tennesee

    LisaKoski, if you get to see the film let me know how you liked it? Thanks much for dropping by :)

  • bethperry profile image
    Author

    Beth Perry 5 years ago from Tennesee

    Der Meister, thanks for reading and commenting :)

  • bethperry profile image
    Author

    Beth Perry 5 years ago from Tennesee

    Nell, I hear you on the "real time" ones! The last one I watched was so boring I've even forgotten the title name of it. Thanks much hon for reading and rating up :)

  • urgurl_bri profile image

    Brandi Swieter 5 years ago from Holland, MI

    I've been thinking about seeing this and now I definitely will. This was a great review; I liked the set-up of it. Thanks for this! :)

  • bethperry profile image
    Author

    Beth Perry 5 years ago from Tennesee

    urgurl_bri, thanks for reading and hope you enjoy The Woman in Black!

  • profile image

    LINDA 5 years ago

    LOVED THE MOVIE NO BLOOD JUST A GREAT SCARE

  • CarltheCritic1291 profile image

    Carl 5 years ago

    I totally agree. Great Review, voted Up, Useful, Awesome, and Interesting :)

  • bethperry profile image
    Author

    Beth Perry 5 years ago from Tennesee

    Cool Linda :)

    Carl, thanks :)

Click to Rate This Article