ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

Movie Review: “Beauty and the Beast”

Updated on October 4, 2018
Movie Beasts profile image

There are many movies that are worth seeing, but there are a lot of stinkers as well. My goal here is to weed out the good from the bad.

Beauty and the Beast

Theatrical Release: 3/17/2017
Theatrical Release: 3/17/2017 | Source

Synopsis

Belle (Emma Watson) is the most beautiful girl in her village but is also a local outcast due to her love for reading. Nonetheless, she is constantly chased by the most desired and most conceited man in town, Gaston (Luke Evans), but she wants nothing to do with him. Instead she dreams of having a much greater and much for fulfilling life than the one that is in store for her in this village, but she cannot leave her father so she finds her escape in books. One day, she discovers her father is missing and, when she goes looking for him, she finds a mysterious mansion that is inhabited by objects that have come to life and is also inhabited by her fathers captor, the Beast (Dan Stevens).

Official Trailer

The Pros & Cons

The Pros
The Cons
Visuals (+10pts)
Predictable (-6pts)
Music (+8pts)
Beauty and the Beast (-6pts)
Emma Watson (+10pts)
Animate Objects and the Beast (-3pts)
All movies start with an average score of 75pts, points are then added or subtracted based on each Pro and Con. Each Pro or Con is designated points, ranging from 0-10, to convey how significant these Pros or Cons are.
Source

Pro: Visuals (+10pts)

This movie was visually stunning. The visual effects, the wardrobe, the colorful set and the musical choreograph. All of this, together, made for a very visually pleasing film. This movie borrows a lot from the original cartoon. Both the wardrobe and the set pieces were evidence of how well this movie, visually, balanced on the line between cartoon and live action. These elements respected the cartoon while bringing everything to life in an impressive way. While I wasn't a fan of the look of the Beast or some of the objects (I'll get into that later), I did think the visual effects in this movie were great. This should not be a surprise, coming from the studio that gave us last year's The Jungle Book. I also thought the dance numbers were impressive. I cannot imagine the effort that went into perfecting these scenes and I thought a lot of the success of this movie would rely on the natural and fantastic feel of these musical sequence. As a result, I think this movie succeeded in, visually, bringing the classic film to life.

Source

Con: Predictable (-6pts)

While I just gave praise to this movie for being visually similar to the original, I thought the story itself was too similar, which made it predictable. Now I understand the impossible situation that Disney has put themselves in. Some will hate their movie if it is too different from the original, and some others will hate on the movie if it is too similar. I think the major plot points of these movies should respect the original but that everything in between can be altered. There were a couple things that bothered me in this movie which I was okat with in the original. I thought the Beast capturing the father felt random and unjustified. More crucially, I thought the switch between Belle hating and caring for the Beast felt unnatural and unjustified. These issues could have easily been fixed in the writers room but I got the impression that the filmmakers were afraid to stray from the story on the cartoon.

Source

Pro: Music (+8pts)

The music in this movie was everything it needed to be. It has all the favorite songs from the classic and it gave some fun dance sequences. This movie also, and very importantly, does not rely on the classic and beloved songs in order to give a fun and decent movie. Instead the songs felt like fun, nostalgic bonuses which is exactly what they needed to be. So sit back and enjoy these wonderfully adapted songs and sequences.

Source

Con: Beauty and the Beast (-6pts)

As I previously stated, I did not t the turn from hating to caring worked in this movie. It felt random and unjustified which resulted in me not caring about their growing relationship or their fate together. Their relationship together is a crucial element of this story so the beginning of that relationship needs to be natural. That, unfortunately, was not the case in this movie. Emma Watson was the only reason I did not designate more points to this Con. Her impressive and subtle acting saved the scene in which Belle's opinion of the Beast starts to change. However the story did not justify that turn for me.

Source

Pro: Emma Watson (+10pts)

Emma Watson was perfect and impressive in this movie, and I think this would have been a much lesser movie without her. Her performance saved some otherwise random or ridiculous scenes. She also had to act with a, mostly, CGI Cast but her performance made it never feel out of place or noticeable. I thought she brought depth to the character that was not there in the classic film and, for a remake of such an iconic character in a more iconic movie, that is no small thing. Emma Watson was easily one of the better parts of this movie.

Source

Con: Animate Objects and the Beast (-3pts)

I remember my negative thoughts when I saw the first images of what Lumiere (Ewan McGregor), Mrs. Potts (Emma Thompson), Chip (Nathan Mack) and the Beast (Dan Stevens) would look like. I thought they looked weird and in a bad way. I hoped it would be a strictly "out of context" opinion and that once I was in the movie and saw these characters in their environment, I would be okay with it. Having seen the movie, I can say that these characters look weird at first but I just kind of got used to it. I think these "look" changes were weird choices by the filmmakers and I do not think they worked. The only reason this did not hurt the movie much was because the movie goes on long enough for you to get used to the weird looks. I still think they should have done something different with each of these characters.

Grading Scale

Grade
Category
Points
A+
Amazing
95-100
A-
Great
90-94
B+
Good
85-89
B-
Decent
80-84
C+
Average
75-79
C-
Watchable
70-74
D+
Bad
65-69
D-
Terrible
60-64
F
Garbage
45-59
Source

Grade: B+ (88pts)

This live-action telling of Beauty and the Beast was good. It had great visual effects, color schemes, wardrobe, music and performances. These all made for a fun movie but what the movie was lacking was originality. It was just too similar to the classic Disney animation for my taste. By being so similar, it failed to correct certain plot issues that were forgivable in the cartoon, but unfortunately, were hard to get through in this version of the tale. Then there was the "look" of the Beast and a few of the objects. These were a bit odd at first as they looked weird in a bad way, luckily you get used to the weird look so as the movie moves on, the "look" becomes less and less of an issue.

Beauty and the Beast was a fun entertaining movie to experience. It could have been better but Emma Watson made up for some of its issues. I would recommend seeing this movie. Adults will enjoy it and kids will enjoy it more since they won't be bothered by any of the issues I listed here.

Comments

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    No comments yet.

    working

    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

    Show Details
    Necessary
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Features
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Marketing
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Statistics
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)