ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

Movie Review: "Kong: Skull Island"

Updated on May 29, 2020
Movie Beasts profile image

There are many movies that are worth seeing, but there are a lot of stinkers as well. My goal here is to weed out the good from the bad.

Kong: Skull Island

Theatrical Release: 3/10/2017
Theatrical Release: 3/10/2017 | Source

Synopsis

Bill Randa (John Goodman) is leading an expedition to a mysterious island known as Skull Island. The expedition is meant to explore the island and uncover whatever resources the island holds. Bill Randa is joined by a former British special forces operative, James Conrad (Tom Hiddleston), an anti-war photographer, Mason Weaver (Brie Larson), and a military escort, led by Preston Packers (Samuel L. Jackson). The large group journey to the island in helicopters, and they start dropping seismic charges to help survey the island. However, there is something on the island that does not take kindly to the intruders.

Kong, a monstrously large gorilla that protects the island. He serves as the islands guardian, and meets group of humans with extreme hostility for dropping explosives on his island. After Kong decimated their helicopters, group is now stranded on the island. Fortunately, they meet a World War II veteran Hank Marlow (John C. Reilly), who has been stranded on the island for approximately 30 years. With his familiarity of the island and the deadly creatures that live in its ecosystem, Hank Marlow is a valuable asset. If they fail to get to the extraction point in time, they will be abandoned on the island for who knows how long. Unfortunately, the massive gorilla is far from the only deadly monster in the island, so their journey will not be an easy one.

Official Trailer

The Pros & Cons

The Pros
The Cons
Kong (+8pts)
Very Full Cast (-8pts)
John C. Reilly (+5pts)
Too many creatures (-2pts)
Action & Pacing (+8pts)
Helicopter Crash (-3pts)
All movies start with an average score of 75pts, points are then added or subtracted based on each Pro and Con. Each Pro or Con is designated points, ranging from 0-10, to convey how significant these Pros or Cons are.
Source

Pro: Kong (+8pts)

Some may know this, and some may not know, but this movie took place in the same cinematic universe as the recent Godzilla movie. The reason I bring this up, was my main concern going into this movie, as my expectations from this movie were shaped by my experience watching 2014's Godzilla. My problem with that movie was that Godzilla was hardly in it! Knowing this and knowing that Kong: Skull Island was made by the same studio and producers, I was concerned that we would end up seeing very little of Kong in this movie.

We saw Kong right from the beginning. Then we saw him often, and we see him kicking tons of monster butt throughout plenty of awesome action sequences. He was meant to be the King and protector of this island, and his actions and the great action sequences really made it feel that way. Most of this movies' success (as far as being a good movie or not) depended on how well Kong was used. Much like 2014's Godzilla, if this character was not used properly, the movie would suffer. Fortunately, the opposite was true with this movie, as I thought that the filmmakers used Kong really well.

Source

Con: Very Full Cast (-8pts)

I think this movies' main issue was how full the cast was. There were way too many characters that the filmmakers tried to focus on, which ultimately led to none of them getting the focus that they needed. I would have liked to have learned more about any of these characters, but because there were so many, I did not learn enough about any of them. This may not seem like a huge issue, but poor character development led to me not being properly invested in almost any character, with John C. Reilly's character being the only exception. As a result, when any monster showed up to threaten the group, I did not care if anything happened to most of these characters. I think this really hurt the movie, but fortunately, the movie's strengths were enough to still make this a decent movie.

Source

Pro: John C. Reilly (+5pts)

John C. Reilly was easily one of the better parts of this movie, but his character was a side character at best. As I previously stated, the movie was filled with main characters that I did not care about, as they got little to no character development. John C. Reilly's character, however, got a fair amount of development and the movie was significantly more entertaining whenever he was on screen. I think the movie could have done without a few of the poorly utilized main characters in order to make John C. Reilly's character more of a focal point. I cared about his story more than the others, he was more entertaining than the others, and he was really the only one that I really wanted to see get home. John C. Reilly was great in this movie and I think most people who have seen the movie will agree with that.

Source

Con: Too Many Creatures (-2pts)

Some may not mind this element of the movie at all, and to be fair, I only included this here because I could not think of anything else to list as an issue with this movie. Nonetheless, there were a lot of bizarre creatures in this movie. Almost all of them seemed to have a body part that resembled nature and (conveniently) most of the predatory creatures only appeared alone, which did not make much sense, but was clearly done to give the protagonists a chance of survival. On one hand, I get that the filmmakers wanted to give new and interesting threats to keep the movie feeling fresh, but some of these creatures felt ridiculous and out of place to me. On top of that, the number of bizarre creatures made Kong feel somewhat less special.

Source

Pro: Action & Pacing (+8pts)

This was an action packed, entertaining movie from beginning to end. There was helicopter action, military action, and most of all, monster action. The action in this movie was great, it happened often, but it was spread out enough so that it never felt redundant. It was complimented by mild comedy to keep the tone fun, and I enjoyed the group of protagonists fluctuating goals, as they discovered everything that this island contained. Kong: Skull Island was an action heavy movie that utilized light comedy and a fun adventure, which complimented the great action sequences really well. The filmmakers found a great balance, which resulted in a film that was fun and filled with exciting action from beginning to end.

Source

Con: Helicopter Crash (-3pts)

One of the more ridiculous parts of the movie involved the helicopters, but I will be as vague as possible to avoid spoilers. The action in this sequence was great, but I was a little taken back by how many people survived separate helicopter crashes. Now, I know that I am no expert when it comes to crashes such as these, as I have not exactly seen action like this in my own life, but even I know that less people should have been able to walk away from the carnage in this scene. I get why the filmmakers wanted these characters to survive at that point in the movie, but maybe change the plot slightly to explain their survival in a more believable way.

I know, I should not be complaining about realism when talking about a movie featuring a giant gorilla fighting giant monsters, but filmmakers need to follow the rules they setup in their own movies. This movie was about normal people in an extraordinary situation. In other words, there was nothing extraordinary about the people that survived the helicopter incident, which made the number of survivors ridiculous. The filmmakers basically treated explosive helicopter crashes as if they were nothing more than an unfortunate spill off your bicycle when you were a kid. Did this hurt the movie much? No, but it was an obvious and easily avoidable plot hole.

Grading Scale

Grade
Category
Points
A+
Amazing
95-100
A-
Great
90-94
B+
Good
85-89
B-
Decent
80-84
C+
Average
75-79
C-
Watchable
70-74
D+
Bad
65-69
D-
Terrible
60-64
F
Garbage
45-59
Source

Grade: B- (83pts)

This movie was everything it needed to be. Was it perfect? No. Its biggest issue was simply that the story was too crowded, which made for main characters that were underdeveloped, which made me not fear for these character's lives at all.

The standout of the cast was John C. Reilly, who made the movie delightfully more entertaining whenever he was on screen. He was both the heart and the humor of the movie, and I only wish that the story gave his character more focus. This movie was full of great, epic, monster action from beginning to end. It was an epic, decently entertaining blockbuster, although it did have its problems.

Comments

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    No comments yet.

    working

    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://maven.io/company/pages/privacy

    Show Details
    Necessary
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Features
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Marketing
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Statistics
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
    ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)