ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

Movie Review: “Passengers”

Updated on December 17, 2018
Movie Beasts profile image

There are many movies that are worth seeing, but there are a lot of stinkers as well. My goal here is to weed out the good from the bad.

Passengers

Theatrical Release: 12/26/2016
Theatrical Release: 12/26/2016 | Source

Synopsis

The Avalon is a spaceship carrying over five thousand passengers to a new planet, Homestead II. The trip will take approximately one hundred twenty years, with the passengers hoping to colonizing the new planet. All passengers are in deep hibernation and are scheduled to wake up a few months before landing on the new planet. However only thirty years into the trip, The Avalon encounters an asteroid field which, upon impact, causes a system error in which two passengers are woken up ninety years too soon. James Preston (Chris Pratt) and Aurora Lane (Jennifer Lawrence) must deal with the realization that they will likely grow old and die on The Avalon before it ever reaches the new planet, and they will have no one to interact with (other than each other) for the rest of their lives. As Aurora and James start to grow fonder of each other, they discover that they (along with the entire ship) are in great danger.

Official Trailer

The Pros & Cons

Pros
Cons
The Decision (+5pts)
Predictable (-10pts)
Lawrence & Pratt (+8pts)
Timeline (-1pt)
Visually Stunning (+3pts)
Sinking Ship? (-4pts)
All movies start with an average score of 75pts, points are then added or subtracted based on each Pro and Con. Each Pro or Con is designated points, ranging from 0-10, to convey how significant these Pros or Cons are.
Source

Pro: The Decision (+5pts)

This was one of the more intriguing elements of the movie. What would it be like to be all alone for the rest of your life? How would you cope with such a fate? These are questions that are explored in Passengers. This causes one of the characters to be faced with an impossible decision. I will not get into what that decision is, due to spoilers, but I thought this moral issue was fascinating. Should one act selflessly or selfishly? This is an easy question to answer out of context but given the situation our protagonists are in, it is easy to understand that after an entire year in such a tragic situation, a person’s morality would be tested. Although it was an intriguing concept, “the decision” was made about thirty minutes into the movie, and that element of the storyline got pretty predictable after that.

Source

Con: Predictable (-10pts)

This movie's main problem was it's predictability. The first thirty or forty minutes were interesting because the filmmakers proposed a compelling moral issue. Unfortunately as soon as "the decision" was made, I was able to map out how the entire rest of the movie would go. I wish the writer(s) had taken more chances on Passengers.

It is a movie in which the premise has a ton of potential, but the filmmakers sacrificed good storytelling in order to play it safe. Any of the expected plot points could have been switched up very easily and would have kept the audience guessing, and interested. For me personally, I would have loved if the whole movie focused only on challenging the morality of the main character, and showing what a life of isolation can do to a person. Instead they tried to make a summer blockbuster style movie...in December...against Star Wars.

Source

Pro: Lawrence & Pratt (+8pts)

I thought Jennifer Lawrence and Chris Pratt were great choices for these roles. Each of them have great dramatic scenes and they had good chemistry together. While I thought Michael Sheen and Laurence Fishburne were great, as always, they had minor roles. This movie was essentially all Lawrence and Pratt, and for a movie with such a small cast, I thought they did a good job of holding onto my interest.

I never felt like I needed more from the actors. I think watching both characters dealing with the concept of living the rest of their lives (another ninety years or so) in isolation was very compelling. They both deal with it in their own way, and I felt the weight of the situation in both of their performances, which is very important for a movie such as this. While I don’t think either will (or should) get Oscar recognition for this movie, I think both actors did a great job.

Source

Con: Timeline (-1pt)

While this is a pretty minor issue, I would have liked to have gotten an approximate timeline for when this movie takes place. The technology used throughout the film is way beyond what we have available now. Everyone on board The Avalon is headed to a planet named Homestead II. This implies that there is an original Homestead. Has humanity tried and failed to colonize the original? Has humanity colonized and used up the original Homestead’s resources already? I would have liked to have known what year all of this takes place and what previous colonizations were like. This is a very minor issue as the movie is not about the colonization of Homestead II, it is about the journey to a new and distant planet, but a year would have helped in giving the story (and its characters) a ton of context.

Source

Pro: Visually Stunning (+3pts)

This movie was visually stunning. The inside of The Avalon was slick, neat, and colorful. The exterior of the ship was complex, and fascinating, although the movie does not spend much time viewing it from the outside to see how everything looks or how it works. As far as space itself, you would not think there would be much to see, but the movie does a good job of giving a vast feel to the great depths of space.

There is also a scene where we get an up close look at “something” (remember, no spoilers), and the effects during this sequence were absolutely stunning. There are a lot of cool effects shown in the trailer such as the loss of gravity while J-Law and C-Pratt are running, as well as gravity loss when J-Law is swimming. Come to think of it, the filmmakers used gravity as a driving force (pun intended) behind some of the movies cooler moments. These were great looking scenes, and made the movie much more entertaining than it would have been without them.

Source

Con: Sinking Ship? (-4pts)

We know from the trailers that The Avalon is “sinking”. In other words, we know that there is something very wrong with the ship. The thing that causes the colossal system failure is kind of ridiculous. The movie implies that there have been many similar voyages in the past yet during the design of the ship, and the planning of this voyage, no one considered this could happen? At the very least, no one thought to keep someone awake in the event that this could happen?

It may not seem like a big deal on the surface, but the whole plot of the movie relies on the system failure, so there needs to be a good reason for why it happens. Instead the audience is given the reason of there being a huge design flaw on the ship. Who knows? Maybe in forty or fifty years we will get a prequel to Passengers in which we discover the ships lead designer was actually a double agent and added the flaw intentionally. That would be really cool, but until then I call “B.S.” on the reason for this ship is "sinking".

Grading Scale

Grade
Category
Points
A+
Amazing
95-100
A-
Great
90-94
B+
Good
85-89
B-
Decent
80-84
C+
Average
75-79
C-
Watchable
70-74
D+
Bad
65-69
D-
Terrible
60-64
F
Garbage
45-59
Source

Grade: C+ (76pts)

Passengers unfortunately has its issues. While it proposed an intriguing moral dilemma, the filmmakers rushed through that moral dilemma. The moral dilemma was: if you are to wake up on a ship by yourself, many decades too soon, how long will it take before you start acting selfishly instead of selflessly? It is a compelling question, but unfortunately the filmmakers did not keep the focus on that question for very long. Instead it shifted into being more of a summer blockbuster-like adventure movie with a severely predictable story.

Chris Pratt and Jennifer Lawrence gave the great performances that you would expect from them. This is not a bad movie by any stretch of the imagination but it had the potential to be so much better than it was. Jennifer Lawrence and Chris Pratt were arguably the best things about this movie. It was a fairly predictable plot that is riddled with plot holes, once you start digging into the specifics, but the two lead actors made it somewhat entertaining. It is also a visually stunning movie, which certainly does not hurt. Again, it is not a bad movie, but there all of its problems made it fall very short of expectations.

Comments

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    No comments yet.

    working

    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

    Show Details
    Necessary
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Features
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Marketing
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Statistics
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
    ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)