ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

Movie Review: “Patriots Day”

Updated on May 29, 2020
Movie Beasts profile image

There are many movies that are worth seeing, but there are a lot of stinkers as well. My goal here is to weed out the good from the bad.

Patriot’s Day

Theatrical Release: 1/13/2017
Theatrical Release: 1/13/2017 | Source


Tommy Saunders (Mark Wahlberg) is a reputable Boston police officer who has recently been suspended. His suspension has consisted of ”lame" jobs like working security at events, and his last “lame” job (before being put back in field) is to work the finish line of the Boston Marathon. No one could have anticipated the horror that was about to occur but, when a bomb went off near the finish line, and Saunders (along with many other brave men and women) suddenly found himself running toward the chaos. He quickly became determined to help the wounded civilians and try to catch the men responsible.

In what was intended as an act of terror, two young men will quickly learn that Boston is a proud, resilient city. The incident would become appropriately named “The Boston Marathon Bombing”. While there were only a few casualties, many lives were changed forever. The bombers are still at large, but Tommy (along with many men and women working in law enforcement) will do whatever it takes to catch those responsible.

Official Trailer

The Pros & Cons

The Pros
The Cons
The Horror (+3pts)
Character Building (-5pts)
The Suspense (+6pts)
Predictable (-2pts)
Boston Strong (+8pts)
Surveillance (-1pt)

All movies start with an average score of 75pts, points are then added or subtracted based on each Pro and Con. Each Pro or Con is designated points, ranging from 0-10, to convey how significant these Pros or Cons are.


Pro: The Horror (+3pts)

Going into this movie, I was curious as to whether or not the filmmakers would "hold back" when depicting the moments of the actual event. This movie had a tough task because they needed to show the horrific moments by not holding back, while also not going too far and exaggerating the incident beyond what would be seen as realistic. I really liked the way they executed the bombing in this movie. It really felt like a war scene yet did not (in my opinion) seem like the filmmakers over dramatized what happened. I really got the sense that everyone present during the bombing would have been scarred both mentally and emotionally (if they were lucky enough to have survived). No one was prepared for this bombing, and I thought (as someone who did not experience the tragedy first hand) that Patriots Day successfully conveyed the horror that was the Boston Marathon bombing.


Con: Character Building (-5pts)

This was probably the movie's biggest issue. The filmmakers simply tried to cram in too many storylines. If I had too roughly count off the top of my head, I would say we got four or five side storylines, other than the main storyline. This did not need to be an issue, but the introduction to all of these storylines consisted of jumping back and forth between them in a way that felt very unnecessary. I get how all of these stories came together but, at least in the beginning, it was a bit jarring and annoying to cut away from a storyline that I was starting to get invested in. I feel like, with what the filmmakers wanted to do, this movie would have been better suited as a limited television series. It would have given ample time to flesh out all of the storylines that the filmmakers were clearly interested in, and I believe there was enough story there to do so. Anyway, it was a movie and, as a result, this many storylines made the movie feel cluttered. This led to me not being as invested in any of the characters because I did not have enough time and development with any one character specifically.


Pro: The Suspense (+6pts)

I really liked the timeline of the movie and that the bombing was not the climax. If anything, the bombing was part of the early rising action. The rest of the movie showed how the survivors dealt with the incident and what got the most focus was how Massachusetts (specifically Boston and Watertown) organized the pursuit of catching the two men responsible for the terrorist attack. The biggest concern of setting the movie like this is that the Boston Marathon Bombing was not that long ago, so a lot of movie goers will (and did) know how the story would end. I thought the suspense, driven by the acting and how invested I was with catching the bombers, helped this issue. Following the cops during their pursuit and what felt like an active war-zone known as Massachusetts, gave a real level of intensity. I thought this movie was equally intense and suspenseful, which was driven by the desire to see the men responsible brought to justice.


Con: Predictable (-2pts)

I already touched on this, but something that I thought hurt this movie (albeit not severely) was when the movie came out as opposed to when the incident happened. We are unfortunately not that far removed from the Boston Marathon bombing. What this meant was that there are many movie goers that already know how the story goes. Is this a huge problem? No, but it takes away a certain level of concern.

Luckily, this was such a passionate incident that I feel most people seeing this movie will look past the fact that they know how it ends and will enjoy the movie anyway. I also want to point out that I do not think the filmmakers should have fictionalized, and changed the story just to be unpredictable. They were kind of stuck between a rock and a hard place here. Either they told the story as it happened and end up making a predictable movie, or they change it up for the sake of being unpredictable and irritate many audience members for fictionalizing a tragic event like this. I thought the filmmakers made the right decision, but it was a predictable movie nonetheless.


Pro: Boston Strong (+8pts)

As is the case in many movies, Massachusetts is like it's own character in Patriots Day. You get all the references to local cities. One example of this was Framingham! I mention that city specifically because that is the city where I saw this movie, live twenty minutes from, and the reference got a huge reaction from the audience that I saw the movie with (which made for a fun moment). Anyway, I really liked the representation of Massachusetts and it's citizens. The passion that Bostonians have for that historic city, and the strength that said passion gave to so many men and women who care about their city was powerful to watch. This movie showed the colorful personality of the people that live in Boston and it's surrounding cities. There was some Boston themed humor, and some dramatic passion. At the end of the day, I think the Boston theme added an extra flavor to this movie that made it so much more entertaining to watch.


Con: Surveillance (-1pt)

I really had to dig deep to find a third thing that I did not like about this movie. I say that to convey to you how minor this “issue” was. Anyway, what I came up with was the surveillance shots. This movie really liked utilizing surveillance cameras to shoot the film.

There is one scene specifically where I thought surveillance cameras were necessary (you will know the scene when and if you see the movie), but there are other scenes that unnecessarily cut from film camera to surveillance camera. It was as if the filmmakers were trying to convince the audience that this was a true story, even though everyone knew it was. It was very unnecessary, because they were not scenes that made me question their authenticity. One was a random scene that could have been taken out of the movie all together, the other was an intense scene where we are following a protagonist who is in danger. It just felt unnecessary to cut to a surveillance viewpoint.

Grading Scale


Grade: B- (84pts)

This was a good movie, but it could have been better. It was suspenseful and did not hold back when showing the horrific event. I thought there were way too many storylines shoved in here, but that was really my only major issue with the film. I thought the acting could have been more gripping, but I would not go as far as to say it was “bad”, it just could have been stronger. I thought Massachusetts had a strong presence in this movie which really helped the film overall.

This was a strong movie and, while I think it could have been better, I do recommend checking it out. It was not an amazing movie, but I liked it enough. Oh, and be sure to check out the testimonials at the end. I really enjoyed hearing from the real people, and I liked seeing the current status of a certain someone’s fate, as I have not heard anything in a while.


This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

Show Details
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)