ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

Movie Review: “Rough Night”

Updated on May 29, 2020
Movie Beasts profile image

There are many movies that are worth seeing, but there are a lot of stinkers as well. My goal here is to weed out the good from the bad.

Rough Night

Theatrical Release: 6/16/2017
Theatrical Release: 6/16/2017 | Source


Jess (Scarlett Johansson) is getting married soon, but she is also running for office, so she does not want her friends to plan anything crazy for her bachelorette party. If things got out of hand, or had things like strippers or drugs, then the press could get wind of it and it could hurt her chances at getting elected. Thus, she just wants a normal bachelorette party, but her friends have other plans. Alice (Jillian Bell), Blair (Zoe Kravitz), and Frankie (Ilana Glazer) plan a night of clubbing in Miami where they are joined by Jess' Australian friend, Pippa (Kate McKinnon).

The group does cocaine then secretly orders a stripper for Jess, and that is when the night goes horribly wrong. After an accident results in the death of the stripper, and with illegal drugs and a dead stripper in their place, the women decide that they cannot go to the police. Instead they must find a way to get rid of the body before anyone finds out what happened. This unfortunately turns out to be much more difficult than any of the women could have anticipated. Jess just wanted a normal bachelorette party with her friends, but what she got instead could mean the end of end her career and her marriage before they even really began.

Official Trailer

The Pros & Cons

The Pros
The Cons
Kate McKinnon (+6pts)
Setup (-5pts)
Climax (+4pts)
Alice (-4pts)
Peter & Bachelor Party (+2pts)
Generic (-6pts)

All movies start with an average score of 75pts, points are then awarded for each Pro and taken away for each Con. Each Pro or Con is designated points ranging from 0-10 allowing me to convey to you how significant these Pros or Cons are.


Pro: Kate McKinnon (+6pts)

Kate McKinnon was one of the best things about this movie. I was not a fan of her role in Ghostbusters, as I thought her character in that movie felt exaggerated and did not fit with the rest of the movie. Fortunately, her character worked in this one. The movie got significantly better as soon as her character made her first appearance, and whenever the other characters needed to focus on the plot, Kate McKinnon kept the comedy coming

Her character, Pippa, was crazy. She was an eccentric and wild Australian woman, and she was constantly delivering effective comedy. Part of it was what she was saying, but the other part was the way she said it. She was weird, and the other characters' reactions to her made her weird delivery work even better. In almost all other areas, this movie was very typical. However, Kate McKinnon as Pippa gave this movie something unique. It was not laugh-out-loud comedy, but her character was always amusing and made this movie a lot more entertaining than it would have been otherwise.


Con: Setup (-5pts)

This movie was about an hour and forty minutes, but it could have (and probably should have) been twenty minutes shorter. The filmmakers spent just a little too much screen-time setting everything up. We got setup for: Jess' career, Jess' relationship, Alice, Blair, Frankie, the group's college days, and then them getting settled in Miami. Some setup was definitely and obviously necessary, but some was not, and the problem came from having no real comedy to get us through the setup. Once this movie got going, it became pretty entertaining, the filmmakers just took a little too long to find this premise's sweet spot.


Pro: Climax (+4pts)

While the setup for this movie was pretty weak, the climax of the movie was pretty entertaining and chaotic. I do not want to get into the details to avoid spoilers, but a lot went down at the end of this movie. Some of it was predictable, some of it happened in ways you will not expect, but I thought the climax of this movie worked well. It had me laughing, it had a bunch of surprising moments, and it had me on the edge of my seat wondering how the rest would go down. The road to the climax could have been better, but it was definitely entertaining once it arrived.


Con: Alice (-4pts)

This character was written pretty poorly in this movie. I have liked Jillian Bell in the few other movies that I have seen her in. She has a unique comedic style that I think works well in supportive roles. Her characters are usually full of quips, they are usually confrontational (which usually throws a wrench into other character's plans), and her characters usually complement the comedic styles of other characters well. In this movie, however, I did not think her character worked.

The comedy from this character felt desperate, and most of it did not land. It felt as if she were trying too hard, and I did not think she fit well with the other characters in this story. I also thought that Kate McKinnon frequently took the role of the comedic relief for the movie, which made Jillian Bell's character feel unnecessary. Interestingly, I think my issue with this character was a lot like my issue with Kate McKinnon's character in Ghostbusters. She felt like she was (comedically) in an entirely different movie than the other characters, and it made the character stand out in a bad way. To be clear, my issue was not with Jillian Bell, but I thought her character's comedy felt desperate and ultimately missed its mark.


Pro: Peter & Bachelor Party (+2pts)

This was definitely one of the funniest parts of the movie. In a movie that was supposed to be about a group of women during a bachelorette party that has gotten out of control, I did not expect to enjoy the male side of this story-line. Peter (Paul W. Downs) is marrying Jess, and while the movie was showing the chaos that was occurring at the bachelorette party, it would randomly cut to the not as exciting bachelor party. It was kind of a role reversal from similar movies that I have seen in the past, and this provided some of the movie's funnier moments.

As the bachelorette party took a turn for the worse, Peter grew more and more concerned. As he grew more concerned, his night started going off the rails as well and it was a storyline that was filled with funny moments—just remember: diapers. While Peter's story-line was very entertaining, the movie obviously focused way more on the bachelorette party—as it should have. Thus, this story-line provided a number of funny moments, but it did not have a huge impact on my enjoyment of the movie.


Con: Generic (-6pts)

My biggest issue with this movie was that it seemed to be trying too hard to be the next The Hangover, but it simply was not. The Hangover was a raunchy, non-stop and unpredictable comedy. Rough Night had a slow start, and had the same (now generic) "crazy" plot points, and the same (now typical) raunchy comedy. This movie tried hard to be the next extremely popular, non-stop, raunchy comedy, but it failed to deliver anything fresh.

The Hangover was an unexpected hit, that worked so well because viewers were not expecting it to be the way that it was. You will go into this movie expecting a crazy bachelorette party, but it never felt as crazy and unpredictable as The Hangover did. The result was a movie that felt like it was trying to capture the formula of The Hangover, but like the two sequels to that movie, Rough Night failed to capture the magic that the filmmakers of The Hangover were able to capture. It just felt like it was going through the motions of what a "crazy" comedy should be, but it never actually felt crazy.

Grading Scale


Grade: C- (72pts)

Was this a bad movie? No, as it had some very entertaining moments and some entertaining characters. Kate McKinnon brought her best and this movie was better for it. Her character was nuts, she was crazy, she was weird and her character was just fun to watch. I also enjoyed the bachelor party story-line, and the climax of the movie.

Was this a good movie? No, as it was too generic and I felt like it was trying too hard to be the next big raunchy-comedy hit. Instead, it came across as being desperate to be a hit, which ended up causing it to fall short. I also thought the setup of the movie was drawn out too long, and there was not enough comedy to keep it interesting during that period. To put it simply, this movie was not bad, but it was not good either. The filmmakers clearly were going for another The Hangover, but the movie ended up being a pretty average comedy.


This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

Show Details
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)