ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel
  • »
  • Entertainment and Media»
  • Movies & Movie Reviews

Movie Review: "Transformers: The Last Knight"

Updated on July 1, 2017
Source

Synopsis

Set after the events of Transformers: Age of Extinction, Transformers have now been deemed (by the United States government) as invaders. With Optimus Prime gone, the U.S. government has put together a force known as the TRF (Transformer Reaction Force) with the intent of locating and destroying all Transformers. Meanwhile, in London, Sir Edmund Burton (Anthony Hopkins) has caught wind of Cade Yeager (Mark Wahlberg) and has invited him, as well as Vivian Wembley (Laura Haddock), to his castle in London. Once there, they learn of King Arthur and his Wizard, Merlin, who were granted a staff of great power and fought alongside the Transformers to end a great war. Now in present day, the god of Cybertron, known as Quintessa, has found Optimus Prime and has brainwashed him to go to Earth to find this staff. With it, she intends to send Earth into ruin and restore Cybertron to it's glory. Cade must work with Vivian and his team of auto-bots to find Merlin's staff before Optimus Prime, then stop Quintessa before Earth is destroyed.

Official Trailer

The Pros
The Cons
The Action (+5pts)
Izabella (-4pts)
Sir Edmund Burton & Cogman (+3pts)
TRF (-5pts)
Laura Haddock (+3pts)
The Plot (-10pts)
All movies start with an average score of 75pts, points are then awarded for each Pro and taken away for each Con. Each Pro or Con is designated points ranging from 0-10 allowing me to convey to you how significant these Pros or Cons are.
Source

Pro: The Action (+5pts)

As should be no surprise, Michael Bay has once again mastered the over-the-top, CGI action. It looks better in this movie than it did in the last one which looked better than the previous movie and so on. There are crazy explosions. There are Transformers fighting Transformers. There are humans fighting humans using guns and swords. There are car chases and shootouts as well as deep sea submarine battles and battles on floating rocks in the sky. It is fast paced action that looks great on the big screen. If all you need from this movie is mindless action, then this movie will not disappoint you.

Source

Con: Izabella (-4pts)

Izabella (Isabela Moner), at the start of the film, is a young girl who is compassionate towards Transformers and tries to find the ones in need of medical aid. She quickly finds herself in trouble and is rescued by Cade. This all happens very early on in the movie (maybe about ten to fifteen minutes or so) and, after that point, the character becomes completely useless. The character really has no place in the rest of the movie but for some unknown reason, she is forced into it anyway. The movie goes on and on, and on, and I kept asking myself "why is this girl here?!". I do not know what the filmmakers were thinking by adding this character throughout the film. I was fine with her inital scene and the actress did a fine job in the role but the character did not serve any purpose to the rest of the movie. All the character did was add more time to an already long film.

Source

Pro: Sir Edmund Burton & Cogman (+3pts)

These characters were a lot of fun. Sir Edmund Burton (Anthony Hopkins) is an old rich guy in England who owns a castle. He has spent his lifetime studying King Arthur, Merlin, the Staff and Transformers. He has a Transformer named Cogman as his butler and the two make a very fun duo to watch. Cogman does not seem like much but proves himself as more of a bodyguard than a butler and he is a very effective bodyguard. These two start Cade and Vivian on their journey then they begin an adventure of their own and it is a lot of fun to watch. My only complaint about this character (Edmund Burton) was the conclusion to his storyline. Even now after seeing the movie days ago, I have no idea what he was doing and what his plan was but at least he was fun to watch.

Source

Con: TRF (-5pts)

Much like Izabella, the TRF was a completely unnecessary part of this story. They did absolutely nothing and could have been taken out of the movie entirely. All they did, much like Izabella, was add time to an already long film. They could not stop Cade or the auto-bots. They released generic decepticons then, a few scenes later decided they had to stop them again. This may sound like a spoiler, but believe me, the TRF did not serve the story at all. You could have taken them out and the movie would not have felt any different. They are completely irrelevant to the story and felt like they were only forced in there because of how much Michael Bay LOVES the military.

Source

Pro: Laura Haddock (+3pts)

Finally! This franchise has figured out that generic, eye-candy female characters do not help a movie. They got Laura Haddock for this film, who is known for projects like both Guardians of the Galaxy films and Da Vinci's Demons (TV Series). While many may still consider her to be eye-candy, she (more importantly) can act. She was able to add depth to the material that was given to her. If only they had given her better writing to work with. Her storyline had a compelling setup but quickly turned ridiculous and predictable. Nonetheless, you will not find Laura Haddock in my list of this movie's issues. She did the best that could have been done with the bad writing she was given.

Source

Con: The Plot (-10pts)

All of my complaints about this movie seem to come from one parent issue: The Plot. Yet again, Michael Bay sacrifices a coherent story for mindless action. I think there is a decent story hiding deep beneath the terrible writing of this film. It is almost as if they took a good story premise, then asked themselves "what is the worst way we could bring this to the big screen?". Izabella was unnecessary, the TRF was unnecessary, and Cade's storyline felt like one big plot device to force Mark Wahlberg's character into this movie. I honestly think that this movie had two main characters and only needed one. Either Cade or Vivian could have taken the lead in this movie but the film struggles with trying to force them both into the film while sparking a romantic relationship between them. Cade is the "chosen one" yet Vivian is the only one who can operate the staff. That makes me wonder: why do you need both? If Cade was the chosen one, he could have been the only one to operate the staff. If Vivian was the only one who could operate the staff and the whole plot hindered on using the staff, what was Cade's purpose? I could go on and on about why the plot for this movie was terrible, but I do not want to ramble so take my word on this. I feel like the bullet points for the plot of this movie are decent, but the execution is awful.

Source
Grade
Category
Points
A+
Amazing
95-100
A-
Amazing
90-94
B+
Good
85-89
B-
Good
80-84
C+
Average
75-79
C-
Average
70-74
D+
Bad
65-69
D-
Bad
60-64
F
Garbage
45-59

Grade: D+ (67pts)

This, like too many of it's predecessors, is a bad movie. It has awesome action but that is not enough for the movie to stand on. It suffers from a terrible and incoherent plot as if feels like all of the characters were somehow forced into it. There were a couple of gems in all the dirt. Anthony Hopkins and his Transformer were a lot of fun to watch, the film finally breaks it's mold and casts a female lead who can (you know) act, and the King Arthur inclusion (for me) worked. The movie sets the King Arthur premise very well but it fails at executing the transition between that and the modern day storyline. Do not get me wrong, this movie has some good qualities but they are severely outweighed by the terrible writing and I think most audiences would agree with that.

I have said it already, but if you only need mindless action from these films then Transformers: The Last Knight will satisfy you. If you need more from your movies than this film is not for you. It has some good qualites but, again, the plot drags all of it through the dirt. I would not recommend spending your hard earned money on this movie.

Are you interested in this movie?

See results

Comments

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • Casey White profile image

      Mike and Dorothy McKenney 4 months ago from United States

      Bryan: I normally HATE science-fiction-type movies, so when my husband told me he wanted to watch "Transformers", I cringed a bit but I was very pleasantly surprised. Can't wait to see all of the others. Thanks for the reviews!

    • Ivan Hernandez profile image

      Erick Hernandez 4 months ago from Maintaining The Ivan Brand in Total Nonstop Ivan

      To date, I've seen all 5 Transformers Movies, the first one in 2008, the second and third ones in 2011, the fourth in 2015, and the fifth one 9 days ago. It's amazing that the critics heavily criticize the Transformers Movies. They're great, but they have their flaws. Sure, the movies are very long, but I appreciated the action in those movies. I thought the addition of Isabela Moner was unexpected. I wish I could've seen more of her, and I have a feeling that she'll be a big part of the next Transformers Movie. Thanks for sharing your review.

    • Movie Beasts profile image
      Author

      Bryan Ouellette 4 months ago from Hudson, MA

      Hey Ryan!

      Yeah if you have enjoyed the past movies then I promise you will enjoy this one. You will definitely think it is worth your money.

    • Fullerman5000 profile image

      Ryan Fuller 4 months ago from Louisiana, USA

      Still will have to see. No matter how many bad reviews this movie gets, I love the Transformers series. I love Bay films. Great action where you don't really have to think to much. Thanks for sharing.