ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

Road to Perdition (2002): A Movie Review

Updated on September 9, 2019
wingedcentaur profile image

The first step is to know what you do not know. The second step is to ask the right questions. I reserve the right to lean on my ignorance.


Friends, let me start by saying that I can only give this film a 6.5 out of 10.

The film is not terrible, but it does not truly excel. Now, you may be asking yourself: How can you have a film with Tom Hanks, Paul Newman, Jude Law, and Daniel Craig, and come up with anything less than a five-star affair?

Well, I think a good part of the problem lies in the precious, velvet gloved treatment that Tom Hanks and the character he plays is treated with by the film.

Say what?

Here's the deal

The story is set in Depression-era New York City, among the Irish Rooney mob. Paul Newman plays the mob boss, the Don, as it were. Tom Hanks plays Michael Sullivan, the mob's chief hit man/enforcer, and, apparently, the adopted son of Paul Newman's character.

Friends, I watched this a few days ago, having borrowed the DVD for free, from my local public library.

I had forgotten that Daniel Craig was in this movie. He plays a Fredo-like character, that is to say, the sniveling, slimy, weak, disloyal heir apparent to old man Rooney (Newman).

Jude Law plays an independent assassin for hire, who is hired to kill Michael Sullivan.


Daniel Craig and Jude Law play particularly slimy, unappealing characters. The problem with this, in this case, is that one gets the feeling that this was done to make Tom Hanks's character look better and more sympathetic by comparison.

This goes to that "precious, velvet-gloved treatment" of Tom Hanks and his character in this film, that I alluded to earlier.

If you compare Tom Hanks's performance in this film, as a "bad guy" hit man, to Tom Cruise's performance as a bad guy hit man in Collateral, we see a big difference.

What difference? What on Earth are you talking about?

Here's what I'm talking about:

In Collateral (2004) Tom Cruise (hit man "Vincent") is allowed to be bad without apology. Tom Cruise is truly playing against type, as it were.

In Road to Perdition (2002) Tom Hanks is only allowed to be somewhat, reluctantly bad with massive apology. One might go to this movie expecting Mr. Hanks to be "playing against type." But this is not really the case.

You may be asking yourself: What is wrong with having Tom Hanks play a character that is "only allowed to be somewhat, reluctantly bad with massive apology"?

Well, as I began to indicate earlier, the problem is that other characters, and their motivations, are put through a funhouse looking glass mirror. This causes the credibility of the entire movie to suffer as a result. In other words, the "suspension of disbelief" is, itself, suspended.

What's the plot?

Michael Sullivan (Hanks) gets the call to go out on a mission for Mr. Rooney (Newman). He and a partner is to "talk" to a guy, for blah, blah, blah... criminal underworld-type reasons, you know...

Now, the guy ends up being shot to death by Daniel Craig's character.

Blah, blah, blah... that wasn't supposed to happen.

Blah, blah, blah... we were just supposed to "talk" to the guy.

Blah, blah, blah... you're such a hot-head psycho...

Blah, blah, blah...

Out of the corner of his eye, Hanks sees something. He and Craig pursue.

Who is it? A witness that has to be similarly eliminated?

The witness turns out to be Michael Sullivan's twelve-year-old son, Michael Sullivan, Jr.

"He must have been hiding in the car."

Say what?

Anyway, moving on...

Oh no! What are we going to do now? Can the boy be trusted to keep his mouth shut?

Stuff happens and then Sullivan (Hanks) ends up having to protect his son from the Rooney mob, to whom he had previously gave his full faith and service.

Blah, blah, blah...

Friends, I know I'm writing "blah, blah, blah..." a lot, but believe me, you are all the better for it.

Here's the point: Tom Hanks's goodness, which the movie never made me doubt, becomes married to the skills he acquired allegedly being "bad" for the Irish mob.

Now, because we're dealing with Tom Hanks not really playing against type, we learn that the entire reason that Michael Sullivan (Hanks) was ever "bad" in the first place, was for a "good," or, at least, sympathetic reason.

Now, the reason that Michael Sullivan (Hanks) became "bad" for the Rooney mob was because he owed a debt to Old Man Rooney. It seems that a poor, orphaned Michael Sullivan was given shelter, food, and a place to belong, a family, by Old Man Rooney (Newman).

Say it with me: Blah, blah, blah...

So what we end up with, then, is this: Good Guy Tom Hanks has to go against the Bad Guys of the Rooney mob. But the only reason Hanks stands a chance is due to the skills he picked up as a Qualified Bad Guy --- Bad Guy for a Good Guy debt repayment reason, blah, blah, blah...

I long for the day when we get to see Tom Hanks play an unapologetic bad guy or villain, in the same way Bruce Willis did in The Jackal (1997), or Henry Fonda did in Once Upon a Time in the West (1969).

Thank you for reading!


This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

Show Details
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)