ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

Side-By-Side: Let the Right One In/Let Me In

Updated on October 6, 2014

Remakes happen all the time, with varying results.  Often, critics and audiences alike are able to come to a consensus as to which version is better.  Not this time.  There is serious debate going on online as to which adaptation of John Lindqvist’s novel is better.  Predictably, most of the critics are siding with the original version - the Swedish film Let the Right One In. 

Let The Right One In - IMDB 8.1 / RTA 90 /RTC 98

Let Me In - IMDB 7.3 / RTA 74 / RTC 90

Let Me In was such a good film that it got grudgingly positive reception.  Most of the reviews I read said that the film was good, but the critics undercut whatever praise they gave Let Me In, saying “there was no reason for it to exist.”   Audiences seem split on the subject.  With the number of similarities and differences between the films, this isn’t that surprising. 

My purpose with this article is to analyze the two films side-by-side and add my views to this ongoing debate.  Those of you who haven’t seen the two films should be aware there will be SPOILERS scattered throughout this article.  Those of you who haven’t seen both these films should seek them out – I can tell you right now, both Let the Right One In (LtROI) and Let Me In (LMI) are excellent films, well worth your time.

The Genre

Vampire fiction is a genre that allows for diverse types of stories, tones, motifs, themes, and storytelling techniques. I’ve always maintained that good vampire fiction hinges on three main characteristics:

- Atmosphere is paramount. One of the main hooks of the vampire genre is its escapist, and at times cathartic, nature. If the atmosphere is off, then the escapist element of the genre is compromised, and the story loses a lot of its emotional clout. Atmosphere can encompass everything from the sets, and lighting to the music in the score.

- The prevailing attitudes are also important. Classically speaking, turning into a vampire was never meant to be a good thing. I’ve seen many vampire stories that paint the transformation in a positive light, and lose a lot of dramatic and thematic weight as a result. The vampire is always a tragic creature.

- The best vampire stories are never about vampires. This may be the most critically important characteristic on this list. The vampires are always a metaphor or a backdrop for making a point, most often about the human condition.

Both Let the Right One In and Let Me In nail the tragedy inherent in the vampire genre, and are very rich pieces of work thematically. Where the two films differ is in atmosphere. The execution of LtROI was much more artistic than LMI. Let the Right One In had a certain coldness to its look, and a certain emotional distance as a result of the way the story was presented on the screen – and some off-putting characterization. The difference in atmosphere sets Let the Right One In apart from the rest of the vampire genre – making it a more original film. I consider Let the Right One In an art film before it’s a genre film.

In contrast, Let Me In has a very in your face, visceral feel to it. Its atmosphere is fantastically gothic, much more typical of a vampire film. In this case the atmosphere being typical is somewhat advantageous – Let Me In is a more accessible film.

My position on this matter is relatively simple. I like vampire movies, and Let Me In worked better as a genre film than Let the Right One In. LMI was a more visceral film than LtROI. Let the Right One In is the more intellectual of the two films, and this is reflected in its astonishing 98 percent critics rating on Rotten Tomatoes.

The Performances/Characterization

Make no mistake, these are performance pieces, and both films were going to sink or swim based on the strength of the performances. Doing a performance piece with child actors is a very risky endeavor. Performance-wise there’s little to critique in either film. Where the films differ is in their characterization.

Oskar/Owen – The main character of both films was a twelve year old boy, whose parents were divorced and was bullied at school. The similarities pretty much stop there. While both characters seem to fantasize about the idea of killing the bullies who make their lives miserable when they think no one is looking, Oskar seems much more fascinated by the idea of killing than Owen. Oskar actually keeps scrap books of newspaper clippings, all murders. And in general he seems a somewhat cold character, who enjoys inflicting pain.

For example: In one scene, Oskar/Owen fights back against the bullies and hurts one of them. Soon after that, he conveys the story to Eli/Abby. The lines and delivery differ at this point, whereas Owen seems overjoyed by the fact that he stood up for himself, Oskar seems more pleased with the idea that he did some damage.

Oskar struck me as more of a misanthrope as opposed to just being an outcast, like Owen. Watching Let the Right One In, I remember thinking that this kid might just shoot up his school in five years time – it was more than a little disturbing. Unlike Owen, Oskar seemed to have a relatively amicable and healthy relationship with his mother, and a working, if complicated relationship with his father (there were definite complications there, because his father was homosexual). Owen’s mother was clearly a bible-thumping alcoholic, and his father was absent.

At the end of the day, that seemed to be the big difference between Oskar and Owen. Owen was a product of his circumstances, and Oskar seems to have been born the way he is. That’s why I identified with Owen more than Oskar.

Eli/Abby - The differences between the Eli and Abby characters were a little more subtle, and have more to do with direction than performance or writing. They took a more classical tact with the Abby character, she’s much more subdued and morose. Eli is by all outward appearances a normal 12 year old girl with a serious appetite for blood. The Abby character is more recognizable as a vampire, and Eli was a bit more subtle about it. For the record, I thought Chloe Moretz’s performance was the scarier of the two – Moretz really runs with the feral side of the character.

The Plot

There are three major plot-points that differ between the two films.

- The first involves the storyline with the police officer, which was added to Let Me In. I think his presence added a certain grounding element to the story. Obviously, if people are dying left right and center, there would be an investigation. I also didn’t buy it in Let the Right One In when Eli attacked the woman and the police didn’t get involved.

- The second is the plot-line with the woman that turns into a vampire. I thought it was interesting in Let the Right One In, that she became conscious of what she was and deliberately exposed herself to sunlight. In Let Me In it played out a bit differently, because she landed in the hospital right after the attack. The LMI sequence was more visceral, the LtROI sequence was more cerebral. As to which one was better, I’m on the fence about this particular point.

- The third involves Abby/Eli’s gender. This is, perhaps, the most controversial difference between the two films. Abby is actually a girl, and Eli was a castrated boy. I see Let Me In as the more emotional of the two films. Making Abby a girl changed the entire feel of the dynamic between the Abby and Owen characters, it added a level of innocence that was absent from Let the Right One In. The other thing this change does is make the story more palatable for mainstream audiences. Whether that’s a positive or a negative depends on the viewer. In this particular case, LMI is hard enough to watch as it is – considering the bullying sequences and the ambiguous ending – no need to make it harder.

The Themes

There is a lot going on in both of these films, but I think there are some interesting differences in the thematic focus.

- I think an argument could be made that special attention went into the bullying sequences in the American version just because bullying has been such a hot topic of discussion in the US lately. Whatever the reason, I found those sequences nothing short of horrifying, and Let the Right One In made less of an impact in that particular area. Let the Right One In was less realistic. In reality, bullies are much more menacing. They use fear as their primary weapon, invading personal space, making threats, etc . It is all about showing power and dominance over their targets. This is something that is demonstrated in LMI, but not demonstrated in LtROI. Let Me In stands as one of the most unsentimental depictions of adolescence I’ve ever seen. The horrific bullying sequences are a critical part of that.

- According to critics, Let the Right One In was much closer to the book than Let Me In. Oskar’s fascination with killing was a big part of his character’s arc – and I think it’s important to note that at one point he throws his knife away, a symbolic rejection of killing, if not violence in general. Owen’s arc is a bit more ambiguous than that, but there is a moment when he could have tried to stab one of the bullies and chooses not to. This suggests that the fantasies that Owen has earlier in the film are just manifestations of his anger and frustration. He never seriously wanted anyone dead.

- Let Me In takes something of a different tack that makes the story more tragic than it is in LtROI. Oskar’s relationship to his parents in LtROI In might have been somewhat strained, but Owen’s relationships to his parents were broken. Owen’s mother spends most of the film passed out drunk, and Owen’s father never appears onscreen. Add to that the bullying – much more visceral and horrifying in LMI – and the vampires, and you have three forms of evil in the story. Which one is the worst? That’s for us to puzzle over.

The Bottom Line

I think very highly of both of these films.  I think that the outside-the-box direction that Let the Right One In took ought to be applauded.  I have to admit though; I connected more with Let Me In.  I have a tendency to gravitate more towards visceral films than films that are purely artistic.  I identified much more with the characters in Let Me In than Let the Right One In.  While Let the Right One In should be admired for its originality and subtlety, Let Me In is subtle in some places and operatic in other places.  That’s how the best genre fiction works.  That’s why I loved that movie.

Let the Right One In – 8/10

Let Me In – 9/10

-          Matt

Seen them both? Which did you prefer?

See results


    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment
    • Drake0525 profile imageAUTHOR


      7 years ago from Massachusetts

      Alright, my thanks to everyone that commented on this article. I knew this would stir up controversy when I wrote it, so responses on both sides of the issue are good to see!

    • profile image


      8 years ago from Dayton, ohio

      I have only seen Let the Right one in. I enjoyed it alot. You could look at it as a movie about two lonely beings who needed each other.

      I took it as a movie about a monster manipulating a troubled youth, grooming him to replace her/his aging servant.

      P.S. Kevin, Oskars father was a homosexual.

    • profile image


      8 years ago

      Oskar's father was an alcoholic not a homsexual.

    • myi4u profile image


      8 years ago from United Kingdom

      I watched both films and I couldn't agree with you more. In fact, I watched Let Me In first without knowing the existence of the novel or Let the Right One In. Hence, I got a fresh mind and I thought it would be just another horror movie, maybe like Orphan. After watching it, I thought it was brilliant! It's definitely a different type of vampire movie. Even though the pace was slow, I was attracted to every bit of it.

      That's when I started to do more googling about Let Me In and then I found out about Let the Right One In and the novel. A couple of days later, I watched Let the Right One In. I was disappointed as it was highly acclaimed by reviewers. I too read about people saying that Let Me In should never be made. I guess they were wrong.

      Great review!

    • profile image


      8 years ago

      Moretz feral? Unless of course you count staring blanking into the screen and looking constipated as feral then yes. Nothing in her portrayal signaled she was feral. I suggest you watch "Hanna" for feral, not a lonely emo vampire.

    • Jeannieinabottle profile image

      Jeannie Marie 

      8 years ago from Baltimore, MD

      I am really interested in reading this book now. I am not that familiar with either of the movies, but I really enjoyed this review. I will definitely read the book, and depending on that, decide if I want to see the movies. Voted up!

    • Drake0525 profile imageAUTHOR


      8 years ago from Massachusetts

      Alright, well I'd be lying if I said that LMI was a fast-paced film. The pacing is very deliberate, but its a more riveting experience than LtROI. Why not give my review of Let Me In a read? Then make a decision of whether or not it's worth your time. Particularly if you felt the bullying parts of the story were lackluster in LtROI, the LMI sequences were borderline disturbing.

    • profile image


      8 years ago

      I have to admit that I haven't seen LMI. However, I did not enjoy LtROI at all. It felt like the movie was dragging on. I agree with you that the movie was unrealistic in several scenes like the lack of police involvement after the attack on the woman. As you also point out, the bullying scene lacked a certain intensity that real-life bullying has.

      After reading your comparison, I feel like I should have watched LMI instead. I was originally planning to, but a friend of mine suggested LtROI, saying being the original, it was the better of the two. But in this case, I can't imagine the remake being worse.

    • Drake0525 profile imageAUTHOR


      8 years ago from Massachusetts

      I wouldn't write off Girl with the Dragon Tatoo that quickly. David Fincher is a hell of a director, and the story looks like it's right up Fincher's ally - you ever see Se7en?

    • StevenRobaina profile image


      8 years ago from Miami, FL

      Let Me In was an American remake to the Swedish movie Let the Right One in which was first a book. Let the Right One In, in my opinion, is waaaayyyyyyy better...but that is how it usually is with American remakes right -___-...I have a feeling us Americans might butcher The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo also.

    • profile image


      8 years ago

      Let The Right One In is an adaption of the book, Let Me In is a remake of that adaptation of the book. Your article starts off wrong there and never stops being wrong really. Good on you for liking a very American remake that only changed the superficial though. That managed to somehow fail in all it's goals.

    • profile image


      8 years ago

      I disagree with many of the things you say. To start with, this is a remake of the movie not the American version of the book. They may have used the book in order to make the remake different than the previous one but it still relied on the movie much more.

      As for distance and emotional coldness, this was done so the viewer can make up their own mind as to how to feel vs the remake telling us. LTROI set it up like we are eaves dropping on something real while LMI strives to pull on our heartstrings.

      This also applies to the comparison between Oskar and Owen. Oskar was not meant to be seen as someone who was born evil. Just like Owen, he is a victim of circumstance but in LTROI there is no one to blame. LTROI says that the mom is trying but it isnt enough, Oskar is still falling between the cracks in a much more urgent way. LMI likes to have someone to pity and someone to blame, and to exagerate to pull heart strings. LTROI makes more of a case that we are all in this together. I couldnt stand that they remade a film and made the bullies worse and the kid nicer. As we can see from your article, it makes Oskar look bad, but Oskar is supposed to represent every kid. The circumstance might change but the need for love is universal.

      I could go on. Both child actors acting in LMI was way to serious and heavy. Oskar and Eli had a light, playful touch in theirs with moments of humour.

      The way they explained the past of the bloodgetter so soon opened up many holes. The ambiguity is not thorough when thought about. For instance, how can Abbey need Owen so much when you have this loser that is jumping through so many hoops for you? Where is the lonliness? And now Owen is going to follow? Where is the love? As bad as life is for Owen at school, it will pail in comparison to what is coming for him next.


    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

    Show Details
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
    ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)