ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

Tag (2018): A Movie Review

Updated on August 26, 2019
wingedcentaur profile image

The first step is to know what you do not know. The second step is to ask the right questions. I reserve the right to lean on my ignorance.

Source

I'm going to "read" you the Googled story summary, so that you won't think I'm making this up.

Here we go:

"One month every year, five highly competitive friends hit the ground running for a no-holds barred game of tag -- risking their necks, their jobs and their relationships to take one another down. This time, the game coincides with the wedding of the only undefeated player. What should be an easy target soon becomes an all-out war as he knows their coming to get him."

The first thing to say is that I had seen this movie in theaters, back in 2018, when it was released.

The second thing to say is that I enjoyed this film a whole lot more than I expected to. I am surprised to find myself giving it an 8 out of 10.

I watched this film, one day, when I had planned to watch Siccario: Day of the Soldado. But you see, its starting time was too late; it would have kept me out way past my bedtime. So, in a spirit of enthusiasm otherwise known as what-the-heck, I bought a ticket for the immediately available Tag.

I went into the designated theater with a sense of contemptuous superiority that allegedly functional adults would dare release a film, to the public, in movie theaters, with such a fantastically absurd premise.

However, like a young George Washington after the cherry tree incident, I cannot tell a lie: I found myself smiling and laughing throughout.

Why?

How?

(Hold on for a rather roundabout explanation. Don't say I didn't warn you.)

In the world of professional boxing (you see?) they say that the punch that really hurts you is the one you never even see coming --- because you can't brace for it.

That's the way that things calling themselves "comedy" should be. In other words, the jokes (like punches in boxing) should not be, as they say, "telegraphed." That is to say, you should not "see them coming from a mile away."

Now, I knew that this movie is a comedy. And I knew that it was about these five grown men still playing tag.

What I did not know was how far the premise would be taken by the movie. I also did not know how deadly serious the protagonists would take the premise --- that is, without a hint of "mugging for the camera," as if to say: Isn't this wacky?

In other words: Imagine a person you know, or have met in passing, with the annoying habit of telling a joke and then immediately laughing at his own joke, before you, the "audience," even have a chance to react to what he has said.

It's like this...

If this movie had stopped the plot for the protagonists to dress up in stupid costumes; and they had rented a park for the day, or something like that --- I would have been annoyed.

Why?

Because the suspension of disbelief, for me, would have been broken. A movie with a fantastically absurd plot would have been admitting that the plot was fantastically absurd. That would not have been funny.

A short detour

A case in point, from the undesirable side, I suspect, is the film Dodgeball (2004). Let me be clear: I have not seen this film, however there are certain things about it, that I believe I can surmise based on the movie's poster, which I imagine to have been indicative of the general marketing for the film.

Blah, blah, blah...

In any event, the film, "Dodgeball: A True Underdog Story," stars Vince Vaughn (whose work I liked in the television series, True Detective) and Ben Stiller.

Now, I can tell that this movie is a comedy. That is because Vince Vaughn is one the poster with a stupid expression on his face, although he is being subtle about it. Ben Stiller is on the poster, with him, wearing a stupid hairpiece with a more blatant stupid expression on his face.

Now, there is, apparently, a woman in this movie, who is wearing an even more outlandish hairpiece and hairdo than Ben Stiller, with an even more outrageously stupid expression on her face. I believe the actress plays a character called Fran.

Now then, if I see all of these people, in the movie's advertising, wearing stupid expressions on their faces, then I expect folks to be "actin' a fool," as they say, for between 90 minutes to two hours.

If I am expecting folks to "act a fool," then there is little that they can do which surprises me, no matter how goofy. Cognitive dissonance is not created.

You see, to my way of thinking, something is "funny," when a seemingly serious expectation is presented, and then undermined in an incongruent, unexpected, and clever way. This creates a cognitive dissonance, in the mind of the hearer of the joke, which he must relieve by laughing.

Let us continue with "Dodgeball" for a bit

By the way, in the advertising photos, on the computer, everybody is not only wearing stupid expressions on their faces, some with stupid hairpieces arranged in stupid hairdos, ---- but everybody is wearing stupid dodgeball-playing uniforms.

One movie made me feel the joy of connecting with my inner child. The other film probably would not make me feel this joy.

Can you guess which is which?

Of course you can, because I have already told you that I have not seen Dodgeball: A True Underdog Story.

I may not have seen Dodgeball but I've heard a lot of stupid things about it.

But let's not stop here. Let's read the Google-supplied plot summary:

"Average Joe's gym and its owner, Peter La Fleur (Vince Vaughn), are both down on their luck. A fancy competing gym called Globo-Gym, run by the maniacal health nut White Goodman (Ben Stiller), is about to put Average Joe's out of business unless Peter can raise $50,000 to keep his mortgage. To save the gym, Peter and a ragtag group of Average Joe's members and employees enter a dodgeball contest with a big cash prize. In response, White forms his own Globo-Gym team to rout the competition."

Not only does the premise sound stupid. But for some reason, I am being vaguely reminded of The Karate Kid.

If I had been watching the movie Tag, and, at some point, I found myself watching the protagonists and their friends and family dress up in stupid uniforms, and rent Yellowstone National Park for a monster all-day game of tag (for charity or something) --- I WOULD HAVE WALKED OUT, I'M SURE.

What I'm trying to say is this:

Tag worked for me because it features a fantastically absurd premise played straight by the principals. The game of tag was integrated into the fabric of the daily lives of the characters; the movie fulfilled the minimum necessary condition, for me, for a movie to be considered what I call an authentic comedy.

What do I consider a proper comedy?

Well, we start with this:

  • What is a joke?
  • I define a joke like this: It is a story that sets up an expectation, X, but the payoff, C, undermines the former in some kind of clever, smart, or unexpected way. This incongruence creates a cognitive dissonance in the mind of the hearer of the joke, which he relieves by laughing, or some other amused response.

Therefore, a comedy movie must have what I call a central joke, which all of the other jokes or gags or pratfalls serve.

What is the expectation that is being undermined in the movie Tag?

For me, it is the idea that these mostly professional type gentlemen, apparently sane and functional, upstanding citizens, in their forties, have remained committed to the children's game of tag and that --- wait for it --- it is not a mere sport or weird hobby for them, like bowling or golf.

The joke is that it is not a joke for them. The joke is that they are serious about finally tagging the game's only "undefeated" player, the one who has never been tagged, played by Jeremy Renner.

The joke is just how far the guys would go to tag Renner; and how far he would go to avoid being tagged.

At the end of the day, I suppose it is because the film played absurd with a straight face, my suspension of disbelief was, somehow, never broken.

The closest comparison I can come up with is to say that Tag (2018) very vaguely reminds me of Clue (1985).

The interesting this is:

Tag is a movie ostensibly built around a children's game for, say, ages 6-12, something like that. Clue is a movie built around a mystery board game, say, for ages 13 and up, or something like that, I would imagine.

But Clue is a much "wackier" film than Tag. This may because, with the former, the board game device is used as a device to parody the mystery-suspense genre in film.

But Tag appears to be a parody of nothing, not even the children's game of Tag itself. This means that there are no genre tropes for the film to seize upon to "send up," as some people say. What this, in turn, means is that the movie is entirely on its own.

If the film is entirely "on its own," as it were, then it has no choice but to take itself seriously.

And while no one likes to see a film "take itself too seriously," the ironically serious tone of "Tag," overlaid upon the fantastic absurdity of the premise makes the funny happen.

Thank you for reading!

Comments

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    No comments yet.

    working

    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

    Show Details
    Necessary
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Features
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Marketing
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Statistics
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
    ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)