ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

The Avengers: "Phase One" (Updated 6/7)

Updated on June 6, 2012 what what


The New York Comic-Con has come and gone and one of the biggest attractions was that of The Avengers. Producer Kevin Feige, stars Cobie Smulders, Clark Gregg, Tom Hiddleston, Chris Evans and Mark Ruffalo were all in attendance at the event and Feige talked in detail about the state of the Avenger film and going forward. Even more so, at the event they screened footage that showed off how Bruce Banner refuses to transform into the Hulk and hasn't done so in close to two years. He is brought into S.H.I.E.L.D. as Nick Fury wants his intellect to help him figure out the Cosmic Cube. The Cosmic Cube is seen to be in Fury's possession at the end of the credits during Thor.

The film is shaping up to be something along the lines of a major sporting event. It's incredibly ambitious of the studios, but it will rake in a boat load of cash for them. You'd think that after this Avengers film that they would call it quits seeing how much money they have put into getting to this point but everything will be easier for them now. They have the casting of the major parts done and signed on for multiple films, and even more important they have the technology and props done for the major special effects. That includes Captain America's shield, Thor's hammer Mjolnir, Iron Man's suits and Loki's trickery. Feige mentions at the convention that he views from Iron Man 1 to the first Avengers film as "Phase One" of the entire process and that from Iron Man 3 in the summer of 2013 to the second Avengers film would then be "Phase Two". It is definetly impressive how the writers are thinking and planning out that far along with this massive project and with decades of stories at their disposal they have plenty to make into an engaging set of films.

Just a warning that from here on out the rest of the article is mostly my own speculation on the upcoming films. A good portion of it comes from what I have heard about the upcoming films and statements by the stars, producers, and director and not to mention my knowledge on Marvel Comics.

Brotherly love
Brotherly love

Phase One

The first Phase of the Avengers films is almost done, and we have seen a majority of them already. Surprisingly, all of the films have been at least moderately good. They have benefited from great performances from all of the lead characters which will help them going forward. The first Avengers film will likely deal with the problems that will rise when these characters come together to face off against an evil that is much bigger than themselves. Loki has been revealed to be the villain of the film, but I'm still not sold that he is the lone evil threat for the film. I have a hard time seeing Thor, Captain America and Iron Man banning together just to help Thor take down his adopted brother. I have a hard time seeing that after Loki has been through hell and back, that he hasn't met a couple new friends that are into a little bit of mischief just as much as he is. Wherever Loki was transported to at the end of the first film, who is to say he didn't meet Red Skull seeing how he seemed to be teleported somewhere after using the Cosmic Cube at the end of the Captain America film.Even more so, Loki could have met the biggest threat that the Avengers ever faced in the comics such as Thanos.

Director Joss Whedon revealed over the summer that Thanos would be a part of the Avengers films and even mentioned that he would be a villain in the first. That leads me to believe he is the overarching villain for the assumed trilogy of the Avengers films. The first film he is likely acting as the big bad who presumably ordered Loki to conjure up some kind of mischief on Earth so that he could benefit from it. If that is the case, it would probably lead to Thanos acquiring his Infinity Gauntlet that gives the wearer incredible and unimaginable power.

Here is what they are thinking: "Oooh that can't be good."
Here is what they are thinking: "Oooh that can't be good."

Loki's "Army"

Knowing that Thanos is the overarching villain, the big bad if you will, than if he is investing in Loki then he is sending Loki to Earth with an army. At the end of the footage that Feige showed at the New York Comic Con convention showed an imprisoned Loki explaining to Tony Stark that he came with an army and that a great evil is rising. Stark presses for the great evil to come out of hiding to which Loki simply laughs. The army that Loki has at his disposal is likely to be either the Skrulls, or even the Kree. Both are alien races and both are quiet the threat more than capable of forcing S.H.I.E.L.D's hand to assemble such a powerful team of superheroes.

The Skrulls are green skinned humanoids that resemble reptiles with large pointed ears and piercing red or green eyes that have the ability to hypnotize humans. The Skrulls also have the ability to shape shift and due to their advanced technology, they have been able to augment their abilities in combat to create a race aptly named Super Skrulls. Super Skrulls were able to emulate the powers and likeness of their opponents.

The Kree being the other option as the army that Loki has at his command look exactly like humans but have blue skin. Kree have a high level of strength that exceeds that of humans, but their downfall is they breath nitrogen instead of oxygen. Under Earth's lesser gravity their strength and speed increase. On their homeland, they had a higher gravity and higher concentration of nitrogen in their atmosphere. To make up for their inability to breathe on Earth they created a formula to help them survive on Earth's surface. The Kree would give the Avengers a tougher opponent in terms of hand to hand combat while the Skrulls could be any body due to their ability to shape shift. There have been some rumors that even Agent Caulson could very well be one of the Skrulls in hiding from the very first Iron Man. It is a feasible thought when you consider that Feige mentions that the villains in the Avengers have been around from the start of Phase One.

The Skrulls
The Skrulls
Not so brotherly love
Not so brotherly love

In House Fighting

It has also been revealed through trailers and through the actors that there will also be some in house fighting, most notable between some of the biggest characters such as Tony Stark (Iron Man) and Steve Rogers (Captain America). Chris Evans has mentioned that the first Avengers film will dive into the dichotomy between his character and Tony Stark. The two have conflicting personalities, one Steve Rogers is out of his element in a time he does not belong in while Tony Stark is a bit of a diva. It is even shown in the first trailer as Tony says to Steve that he doesn't play well with others to which Steve responds "a big man with a suit of armor, take that away what are you?"

There have also been rumors that in the beginning that Thor and Iron Man fight to find out who the strongest of the group is. Which would go along the lines of the comics really well, and also in the trailer you see Thor with his hammer in hand lunging at Captain America. So it seems that the main three heroes will be facing off against each other as they work out their issues in the beginning of the film.

Ant-Man could be a part of the team in Phase 2
Ant-Man could be a part of the team in Phase 2

Phase 2

Kevin Feige explained that Phase 2 of the Avengers films will begin with Iron Man in 2013. Writer/Director Shane Black has mentioned that the villain of the third and final Iron Man will be his biggest enemy, Mandarin. Mandarin was alluded to a few times in the first Iron Man film as he was the leader of the terrorist group known as the Ten Rings. Some of Tony's captors mentioned the Ten Rings multiple times throughout the film. Mandarin is a very powerful villain in the canon of Marvel Comics as he is a skilled hand to hand fighter, he is a scientific genius and the ten rings he wears grants him great power as each ring has its own separate power. Introducing a villain on the level of Mandarin also gives the writers the ability to bring him into the fold of the Avengers films. Mandarin's power could give the Earth's mightiest heroes a good fight, even more so if he was in support of Thanos.

Feige mentions that phase two includes more than just Iron Man 3, Thor 2, and the presumed Captain America 2 but also adding new characters in to the fold such as Doctor Strange, Ant-Man and the Guardians of the Galaxy. Doctor Strange has been one that has gained the most traction as their have been reports of actors they are seeking out to play the part. Some actors that have been rumored include Tom Welling (Smallville), and Robert Dempsey (Grey's Anatomy. My personal opinion is that Clive Owen would make a great choice for the role. Ant-Man has had a hard time getting off the ground, but it does have Edgar Wright (Scott Pilgrim) attached to direct. Guardians of the Galaxy has just been talked about, so not much is known about who is to direct, or star in the film.

Can't you see Clive Owen in this role?
Can't you see Clive Owen in this role?

Doctor Strange

Doctor Strange is a different hero then what we are used to seeing in cinematic form due to his power and how he can be hard for an audience to buy into as a character. Doctor Strange is a master magician and labeled as the "Sorcerer Supreme" while also being viewed as more powerful than any human being. Strange can use magic to virtually any effect he desires such as telepathy, energy blasts, teleportation, astral projection, creating shields and and the ability to heal. The sorcerer may just be the most difficult hero to do well in cinematic form due to his powers in fact when he first came along in comic book form people who read the comic began to question if the writers were drug users because of just how strange the character was.

Introducing Doctor Strange into the canon of the Marvel Universe films makes sense seeing how the films are branching out into different realms since Thor. Thor introduced the idea of other realms such as Asgard and Jotunheim. Strange's origin story would be easier to buy after being introduced to all of these realms and whatever alien life form Loki comes to destroy Earth with.

Nathan Fillion's connection to director Joss Whedon could land him the job
Nathan Fillion's connection to director Joss Whedon could land him the job


Hank Pym is the alter ego of the Ant-Man as he is a biophysicist and nanotechnology expert. Pym took it upon himself to become a superhero when he discovered a chemical substance that would allow the user to alter their size. He then armed himself with a helmet that would allow himself to control ants. With all of that being said, it is incredible hard not to chuckle at it. It is even more difficult for a viewing audience to get behind a superhero that shrinks to the size of an ant and control ants. Who is to say that Ant-Man would not be killed by a villain just by a simple step, and that's why he is also another hero to make a film center on. He is better off in a sidekick type of role even though he is incredibly important to the Avengers. In the comics he and his girlfriend the Wasp, were the some of the founding members of the Avengers. Even more so one of his greatest enemies and even of the Avengers was one of Pym's own creations, none other than Ultron.

It is inevitable that at some point Ant-Man will be seen on screen and ultimately he will need to be portrayed by someone. A year ago there were rumors that he would be played by Nathan Fillion, or David Boreanaz. Both actors could pull the part off and have an advantage on the role as both actors have worked with Avengers director Joss Whedon. Fillion was the lead actor in Whedon's television series Firefly and Fillion guest starred as a villain in Buffy the Vampire Slayer which was another one of Whedon's successful shows. Boreanaz starred in Buffy the Vampire Slayer, as Buffy's Edward if you will. Boreanaz played the vampire with a soul over two television series that Whedon created, Buffy and Angel. The actors may not be able to be involved in the Avengers project as they both are attached to popular television shows.

The Future

Considering how the first Avengers film will explore the strained relationship between Captain America and Iron Man it has led to some questioning whether or not the Avengers films will go into the Civil War where heroes are forced to register to the government. It leads to a rebellion in which Captain America leads as he feels it is not the American way, while Iron Man is the leader of the registration. It would be too difficult to do for a film, as it would branch over multiple films and seeing how Thanos is the overarching villain of the Avengers it seems even more unlikely for them to go to the Civil War storyline no matter how good it is.

Another character that they could eventually bring into the fold would be that of the Black Panther. In Iron Man 2 there is an Easter Egg that points to him, and even Captain America's shield is made of vibranium which is a type of metal only found in the Black Panther's home of Wakanda.

Again, this is all speculation as to where I think the films could go, and when I know more about the films I will post them here. Here is to waiting until the summer.

Scarlet Witch and Quicksilver

Now that I have seen the Avengers (and reviewed it, yes it is fantastic) it is clear to me what Phase Two of the Marvel Studios-verse will focus on. From Iron Man 3 to Avengers 2 will become a more personal battle for Captain America, Iron Man, Thor, Hulk and the rest of the gang seeing the new bad that is in town. I will not say who considering it would be spoiling something at the end of the Avengers. The other interesting aspect of Phase 2 regards Robert Downey's contract. His contract with Marvel is up after Iron Man 3, my betting money says he comes back, but a lot of people thought Edward Norton would come back to. It is impossible to know these things ahead of time. However, Downey's career has been on an upswing since Iron Man 1 due to how well he fits the character. With the amount of money his solo movies and the Avengers will make, I'd imagine it would be tough for anyone to walk away from. Producer Kevin Feige has stated he has contingencies in place in case Downey decides to leave (god please don't kill Tony Stark). He has also stated that he wants to add to the roster, he did so already by buying the licenses to the Marvel characters, Quicksilver and Scarlet Witch. My money is on the two appearing in Hawkeye's rumored solo film. That way we can understand his character better, and he can flesh out his relationship with Natasha. When she turned down his advances in the comics, he turned his eye to Scarlet Witch but she also didn't love him and ended up marrying her fellow Avenger teammate Vision. By going that route in a Hawkeye movie they could potentially add three good characters to the Marvel Universe for future films. The other planned future films include the Inhumans, Guardians of the Galaxy and Ant-Man. Another possible movie that could add another character into the Marvel-verse of films is Black Panther. His character has been alluded to a few times in the previous films such as Iron Man 2, when Tony is looking at a S.H.I.E.L.D. screen that had been focused on Wakanda the place that the Panther could be found. The Marvel-verse has followed the Ultimate version of the Avengers storyline and after banding together to take down an alien threat they did meet up with the Black Panther in Wakanda. If they don't give him his own movie, they could add him to the team in Captain America's next film as the two had respect for each other. Panther was essentially his people's version of Captain America, as he was a symbol of hope in Wakanda. Many fans have clamored for the character to hit the big screens, but it can be hard to market a film titled Black Panther as it could potentially rub some people the wrong way. Either way it is intriguing to see where Marvel Studios could go from here.

Black Panther

Well never mind to the idea that Marvel Studios may have been unsure about making a Black Panther as it seems to have gotten a green light. By all accounts it sounds as if we will be seeing T'Challa, the Black Panther, on the big screen for his own film sometime after Captain America 2. It sets it up so that he can be present in the second Avengers film as well. It is a far ways off as Captain America 2 is set to release in April 2014. The script has already been penned by Mark Bailey, which by all sources, is a really good script. Now it will come down to getting a director, and someone to play the part of T'Challa. Marvel previously eyed Idris Elba for the part, but that doesn't seem to be in the cards anymore as he is playing Heimdall. An actor that they could reach out to would be Shemar Moore of Criminal Minds to play the part. Granted, there are no reports of them signing an actor or director for the film as of now, but I am certain after the filming of Iron Man 3 that Black Panther will get some more attention.


    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • Nickalooch profile imageAUTHOR


      6 years ago from Columbia, MD

      Thanos. Essentially one of the most powerful entities in the Marvel Universe.

    • profile image


      6 years ago

      whos the last enemy shown in the avengers movie?

    • profile image


      6 years ago

      Anyone ever thought about the Planet Hulk arc or World War Hulk?

    • profile image


      6 years ago

      the movie was AWESOME!!! no spoiler, but the Hulk STOLE THE MOVIE!!! well worth the $14 for 3d! GO SEE THIS MOVIE!

    • Ironman1992 profile image


      6 years ago

      hope the Avengers will live up to the hype

    • Nickalooch profile imageAUTHOR


      6 years ago from Columbia, MD

      Michael Clark Duncan! lol James Earl Jones is to connected to Vader. I'd say Duncan or hell even a guy like Javier Bourdem.

      Thanos would be the best big bad for the Avengers so it just makes sense.

    • Stevennix2001 profile image

      Steven Escareno 

      6 years ago

      Well then, we'll have to wait and see. Personally, I'm not exactly a Fin Fang Foom fan either, but I can see how he might match the description of being a Leviathan type creature. I'm starting to think you might be onto something about Thanos now that i think about it, as the evidence does suggest that he's poised to be introduced into this movie universe at some point. If he does turn out to be in the Avengers film, I think they should just make his character CGI, while having someone like James Earl Jones, or anyone with a deep voice, do his voice. That would be pretty cool to see happen.

    • Nickalooch profile imageAUTHOR


      6 years ago from Columbia, MD

      its perfectly fine. I always appreciate the comments. As far as Ant-Man, another angle i thought about was introducing Pym in this one as someone who works for SHIELD, and then possibly have Ultron be a villain somewhere along the line so he and Iron Man team up to take him down. something along those lines ive heard rumbles about.

      the leviathan thing, that interests me. Fin Fang Foom would be a good thing to bring in but I honestly dont want to see him in cinematic form. but i think im in the minority on that one. i'd rather see guys like Baron Zemo, Red Skull, Loki, Thanos, Warlock, Mephisto, Mandarin and so on as the enemies of the Avengers. bigger the enemies, the worse the film will be IMO

    • Stevennix2001 profile image

      Steven Escareno 

      6 years ago

      Pretty well written hub. I remember watching a news feed on youtube where it was mentioned that Loki is teamed up with sort of a Leviathan creature in the upcoming "Avengers" film. Although, the journalist didn't exactly say what this Leviathan like creature was, but she did speculate it could be an alien space craft OR something else entirely. Personally, I think it might be Fin Fang Foom probably, as that could be a great lead into "Iron Man 3" to introduce the Mandarin. that's another possibility to explore there.

      As for Ant-Man, I said it before, and I'll say it again, I don't care what kind of movie you make around that character...his film will bomb..period. It's the equivalent to what happened with Robin William's "Popeye." Don't get me wrong, I grew up watching the "Popeye" cartoons, and I even watched that abysmal show, "Popeye and Son", but if you look at the character's history, he's not an interesting enough character to base a movie around. It doesn't mean he's a bad character per say, but certain comic book characters and cartoons are not meant to ever be adapted to different mediums, as it just wouldn't work. Popeye was obviously one of these characters, as I thought the movie was about as faithful to the old cartoons as you could get, but it still sucked. This goes back to my old theory that I keep telling my brother is that some cartoons and comic book characters can't translate well into film like others can; regardless of how faithful you make it to the original source. It's a sad reality, but it's the truth.

      As for how this relates to Ant-Man, the reality is that Ant-Man isn't an interesting character on his own, and he's only interesting in context when he's associated to the Avengers. Don't get me wrong, I hope I'm wrong when I say that for Marvel Studios' sake, but the reality is that the truth is the truth. Some comic book characters and cartoons don't belong in big screen live action adaptations, and I hate to say it, but Ant-Man might be one of them. However, I was wrong about Captain America, so I guess we'll have to wait and see.

      I think a Black Panther film might be interesting. The only thing that would concern me about it is that from a marketing standpoint, his name would probably spark a lot of controversy among main stream movie goers seeing as how his name is almost exactly the same as the infamous terrorist group...THE BLACK PANTHERS! therefore, I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if Marvel Studios releases Black Panther's movie under a different name to avoid the controversy; kind of like how none of the Bond movies are named after James Bond..hint hint. Hell, I'd do the same damn thing if they did, as you and I both know that when you bring up the name "Black Panther", majority of people will assume you're talking about the terrorist group and not the comic book character. It's just the way that it is. Don't get me wrong, I think Black Panther would make a great movie, but just the name would concern me. Not saying they should change the characters name, but just release the film under a different name, as I mentioned earlier with James Bond.

      As for Dr. Strange, I think I mentioned this in the Superheroes Assemble hub that I wrote a while back that I think he would definitely be an interesting character to see on screen; simply because he's different than any other superhero out there. He's not exactly a traditional superhero per say, and his stories are arguably some of the most unique out there.

      I do agree with you that it's highly unlikely that they'll go with the Civil War story arc for the Avengers just yet, as it's way too soon for that. Well, whatever they do though, it should be interesting to find out, as I'm a bit curious to see how far Marvel Studios will take this newly designed movie universe they created. Granted, it's been done before by Kevin Smith and his series of films, but we've never seen it applied to a series of big budget franchises like what Marvel has here. It should be interesting. Anyway, I'm sorry to hijack your hub, as you know that I have a tendency to get lost in my train of thought. Anyway, I have to say it looks like you really did a lot of research into this, as there's even stuff in here that i didn't know about until I read this hub of yours. Oh well, i guess you learn something new everyday. Anyway, keep up the good work.

    • Nickalooch profile imageAUTHOR


      6 years ago from Columbia, MD

      Like i said, its possible that Fillion or Boreanaz could play that part but i dont see it. Like you said if they do an Ant-Man film it would probably be a light-hearted film and Fillion and Boreanaz have a comedic flare to themselves. There have been some reports of Simon Pegg playing the part, but I really can't buy him as a genius or a superhero.

    • Daffy Duck profile image

      Daffy Duck 

      6 years ago from Cornelius, Oregon

      Ant Man. I've never heard of him until now. That superhero would make a good movie (comedy). Who would they get to play that role I wonder?

    • rai2722 profile image


      6 years ago

      Can't wait to see the movie. Thanks for bringing a sneak peek into it. Great hub and vote up.


    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

    Show Details
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)