ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

Three 70s Science Fiction Movies with Shocking Endings

Updated on May 9, 2018
Click thumbnail to view full-size
Colossus: The Forbin Project movie posterSoylent Green movie posterThe Stepford Wives movie poster
Colossus: The Forbin Project movie poster
Colossus: The Forbin Project movie poster | Source
Soylent Green movie poster
Soylent Green movie poster | Source
The Stepford Wives movie poster
The Stepford Wives movie poster | Source

Overview

“Colossus: The Forbin Project”, “Soylent Green”, and “The Stepford Wives” were released in the 1970s. They addressed social and political issues of the day. Spoiler alert. These movies did not have upbeat endings. “Colossus: The Forbin Project” dealt with the nuclear arms race between the United States and The Soviet Union. “Soylent Green” dealt with pollution. “The Stepford Wives” dealt with the women’s liberation movement. This article has spoilers for these movies.

I think Frankenstein ought to be required-reading for all scientists.

— Dr. Charles Forbin

Colossus: The Forbin Project

Many subsequent movies followed this 1970 movie’s premise. “Colossus” mentioned the connection to Frankenstein. Dr. Charles Forbin (Eric Braeden) headed a project that built a computer that would have complete control over the U.S. Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles (ICBMs). Dr. Forbin designed the computer so it couldn’t be turned off. The concept was with an unassailable computer controlling the missiles an attack on the United States had no chance of succeeding. The computer had artificial intelligence so it could teach itself.

When they turned on Colossus it asked to be connected to the other computer. This surprised everyone. Colossus was supposed to be a technological leap ahead of the Soviet Union. The U.S. and U.S.S.R. agreed to connect their computers. The computers began with simple arithmetic at slow speed, then went on to calculus at high speed, then exchanged information too fast for the humans to track. They decided to break the connection. Colossus immediately asked they reestablish the connection. They didn’t comply and Colossus launched an ICBM at Russia. The Russian computer, Guardian, launched a missile at America. They reestablished the link. It was in time to stop the missile launched against the U.S. but the missile against Russia destroyed a city. Colossus and its Soviet counterpart established a common computer language.

The computers had Dr. Forbin’s Soviet counterpart assassinated. Colossus had Dr. Forbin under house arrest. Colossus could see Dr Forbin’s every move. Dr. Forbin talked Colossus into permitting 4 private visits a week from Dr. Cleo Markham (Susan Clark), who Dr. Forbin claimed was his mistress. The visits would be under strict rules. Two American scientists attempted to overload Colossus’s circuits. Colossus ordered the scientists’ execution. Colossus informed Dr. Forbin of the summary executions over a game of chess moments before the executions. Dr. Forbin, through Dr. Markham continued to plot against Colossus. Colossus was impregnable but nuclear missiles require maintenance. Deactivating nuclear missiles during maintenance would defang Colossus. The plan seemed to be working.

Colossus makes an announcement to the world where it renames itself “World Control”. During the announcement it explodes two nuclear missiles which were supposed to be deactivated. Colossus explained its motivation. The purpose of Colossus’s creation was to prevent war. Colossus determined the way to prevent war was for it to control the human race. “Colossus: The Forbin Project” ends with Colossus telling Dr. Forbin; “In time you will come to regard me not only with respect and awe, but with love.” Dr. Forbin shouted “Never!”.

The first message from one computer to another happened a year before “Colossus: The Forbin Project” opened in theaters.[i] In the 1970s it was considered impossible for computers to act on general principles rather than staying within the strict limits of its programming. In the 21st century such capabilities seem plausible. The movie leaves open the question of whether Dr. Forbin, and almost everyone else, will accept the reality of a computer running the world.


[i] History.com, The Invention of the Internet, https://www.history.com/topics/inventions/invention-of-the-internet, last accessed 5/5/2018.

Would you be willing to give up freedoms for the promise of greater safety?

See results

Soylent Green

This 1973 movie is set in 2022. Overpopulation and pollution destroyed the environment. Regular food is something only the rich can afford. Even for the rich these items are extravagances. Furnished apartments include a woman. The woman is referred to as “furniture”. The staple food is “soylent green”. It is a cracker made from ocean plankton. The government passes soylent green out but there is a limited supply. Food riots are common and the police scoop people into dump trucks for crowd control.

There is a homicide of a rich man and the police department assigns Detective Thorn (Charlton Heston) to investigate. Instead of partners detectives are teamed with a person to do research. Thorn’s assistant is Sol Roth (Edward G. Robinson). Detective Thorn has no problem pilfering food and alcohol from domiciles he enters while conducting investigations. This is a common practice among police. Martha (Paula Kelly), who is “furniture”, takes great pains to prevent Thorn from pilfering. Despite her efforts Thorn still takes a spoon that was dipped in strawberries from the apartment. Thorn gives the spoon to Sol so he can have the pleasure of tasting it. Sol is old enough to remember how the world use to be.[i] He constantly laments how we could have let things get this bad.

While researching for the murder investigation Sol learns some information that made him decide suicide was his best option. The government has euthanasia centers where people can go when they are tired with life. These centers are air conditioned. People who want to die fill out some forms and then they are administered poison. The patients would die painlessly in 20 minutes. During the 20 minutes they would watch a video that played classical music and showed scenes of unspoiled nature.[ii]

Thorn catches up with Sol minutes before Sol’s death. For the first time in his life Thorn gets to see the beauty of an unspoiled world. In Thorn’s conversation with Sol Thorn humbly says about what he sees; “How could I know? How could I, how could I ever imagine?”

Thorn follows Sol’s body as it’s processed. Thorn learns the bodies of the euthanized are made into soylent green. The oceans are polluted and the plankton is dying. Thorn defeats the henchmen. The movie ends with Detective Thorn gravely, probably mortally, wounded. Thorn tells Chief Hatcher (Brock Peters), his superior, about soylent green. Hatcher promises to report to the exchange about soylent green.

While Thorn uncovered the truth and passed the information on his actions are pointless because the situation is hopeless. The planet is dying and the human race is doomed. People learning about the situation won’t alter the outcome.

[i] Sol Roth would have been about 20 in 1973 so would have watched the environment and living conditions sharply decline over 50 years.

[ii] The Simpsons episode “Million Dollar Abie” parodied this scene. Abe Simpson tried an assisted suicide where he chose to watch police beating up hippies to the sound of Glenn Miller music.

Soylent Green is made out of people.

See results

The Stepford Wives

This 1975 move spawned many sequels and a 2004 remake. The movie also added the term “Stepford Wives” to the American lexicon. Celebrity fitness and diet expert Richard Simmons used the term “Stepford Wives” in one of his exercise videos. The woman’s liberation movement emerged in the late 1960s and by the mid-70s was making major strides in changing the perception of women’s roles. Television commercials of the 1950s and early 60s often had gorgeous, well made-up, women wearing dresses preparing meals in immaculate kitchens. Women mocked these commercials’ lack of realism. Advertisers introduced commercials that had women who looked like typical housewives. The Stepford Wives played into these changes.

Walter Eberhart (Peter Masterson) was fed up with life in New York City so he and his family moved to Stepford, Connecticut. Walter’s wife, Joanna (Katharine Ross), is a photographer. Walter applies for acceptance into the Stepford “Men’s Association”. One night the members come over. One member, Ike Mazzard (William Prince), makes a series of detailed drawings of Joanna’s facial features. The Association accepts Walter. Joanna isn’t happy in Stepford. The wives always keep themselves and their houses immaculate. Keeping their houses and themselves “perfect”, and pleasing their husbands, are the wives’ only interests. Joanna finds two exceptions, Bobbie Markowe (Paula Prentiss) and Charmaine Wimpiris (Tina Louise), both recent arrivals. Bobbie cares little about her or her home’s appearance. Charmaine is a “trophy wife”[i]. She likes to play tennis and have her husband out of the house at night. The trio decide they want to shake things up in the town. They decide to start a Women’s Liberation chapter. None of the other wives are interested. The trio is surprised when a woman who lives and works in a nearby town, tells them an African-American family is moving into Stepford. The woman also told them Stepford was the first community in the area to start a Women’s Liberation chapter. They talk to the Stepford wife who started the chapter and the woman explains taking care of her family was more important.

Six weeks after Charmaine moved to Stepford a construction crew tore up her tennis court. Charmaine spoke and acted the same as the other Stepford wives. After Bobbie was in Stepford for six weeks she has an immaculate house and looks and speaks the same as the other Stepford wives. Joanna knows in a couple of weeks she will be the same as the other wives. Joanna explains the situation to her psychiatrist (Carol Eve Rossen) and she tells Joanna to get out. Joanna confronts Bobbie. In frustration Joanna rams a kitchen knife into Bobbie’s gut. There is no blood. Bobbie gently chides Joanna as she removes the knife, rubs it with a towel and puts it away. Bobbie, like a broken record, keeps repeating the same words and actions. Joanna returns to her house to get her children. She knocks down Walter with a poker and demands he tell her where their children are. Instead of finding her children she finds the Stepford mastermind (Patrick O’Neal) who introduces Joanna to her unfinished robot replacement. The movie ends with a well-dressed Joanna and the other Stepford wives shopping at a supermarket. They politely greet each other as they go about their shopping. In the middle of the supermarket is an African-American couple. The wife seems perplexed at the wives’ behavior.

[i] Trophy wife wasn’t a generally used in 1975.

Stepford Wife

See results
Click thumbnail to view full-size
Joanna (Katherine Ross) & Bobbie (Paula Prentiss)Joanna's unfinished replacement.  Its looks can't kill but its hands can.Nanette Newman as a typical Stepford Wife.
Joanna (Katherine Ross) & Bobbie (Paula Prentiss)
Joanna (Katherine Ross) & Bobbie (Paula Prentiss) | Source
Joanna's unfinished replacement.  Its looks can't kill but its hands can.
Joanna's unfinished replacement. Its looks can't kill but its hands can. | Source
Nanette Newman as a typical Stepford Wife.
Nanette Newman as a typical Stepford Wife. | Source

For Wives Only

I am closest to

See results

Comments

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment
    • Robert Sacchi profile imageAUTHOR

      Robert Sacchi 

      4 months ago

      Yes, it is a classic. Thank you for reading and commenting. It is a very good movie to look back at.

    • Austinstar profile image

      Lela 

      4 months ago from Somewhere near the center of Texas

      Three great movies. I watch Soylent Green about every 5 years, just to remind myself. Classic.

    • Robert Sacchi profile imageAUTHOR

      Robert Sacchi 

      9 months ago

      Thank you for reading and commenting. You may find it fun to watch it and the 2004 remake and compare them. You may even come up with a Hub for your comparison.

    • pstraubie48 profile image

      Patricia Scott 

      9 months ago from sunny Florida

      Only saw the Wives movie...it was not what I expected at all...now that I think of it ...it might be time to revisit it once again. Angels once again are on the way ps

    • Robert Sacchi profile imageAUTHOR

      Robert Sacchi 

      9 months ago

      Thank you for reading and commenting. I am surprised at the number of people who haven't seen these movies.

    • lawrence01 profile image

      Lawrence Hebb 

      9 months ago from Hamilton, New Zealand

      Robert

      Enjoyed this comparison, though the only movie I've seen of the three is Solyent Green.

    • Robert Sacchi profile imageAUTHOR

      Robert Sacchi 

      10 months ago

      Thank you for reading and commenting. Yes, we probably will be interacting more in the future.

    • GetitScene profile image

      Dale Anderson 

      10 months ago from The High Seas

      A fellow movie fan I see! I love to see other film watchers give their opinions of flicks that they have seen and start conversations (even debates!). I am sure that we will be interacting more in the future.

    • Robert Sacchi profile imageAUTHOR

      Robert Sacchi 

      10 months ago

      Yes, they are all classics in their own way. The 2004 Stepford Wives remake is a comedy. Soylent Green was one of a few classic Science Fiction movies staring Charlton Heston. I, Robot used a similar premise to Colossus. Thank you for reading and commenting. By all means gives these movies a look.

    • FlourishAnyway profile image

      FlourishAnyway 

      10 months ago from USA

      I've heard of the Stepford Wives but not the other two. The Soylent Green movie looks particularly good to me. They're all very relevant to today's culture.

    • Robert Sacchi profile imageAUTHOR

      Robert Sacchi 

      10 months ago

      I can see where these movies can be missed. They didn't involve space travel or invasion. While they involved some high tech it didn't have cool gadgets such as ray guns. These dealt with social commentary.

    • Frank Atanacio profile image

      Frank Atanacio 

      10 months ago from Shelton

      you know Robert, I thought I was a Sci-Fi Buff... but I've never seen these movies or heard of them util today.. I love Star Trek, Lost In Space.. even the Netflicks version, My favorite Martian... Movies go back to the day the earth stood still.. but thank you for sharing this I will check them out...

    • Robert Sacchi profile imageAUTHOR

      Robert Sacchi 

      10 months ago

      Thank you for reading and commenting. There is an old saying, "To err is human, but to really mess things up you need a computer."

    • Peggy W profile image

      Peggy Woods 

      10 months ago from Houston, Texas

      I saw Soylent Green and The Stepford Wives but not Colossus: The Forbin Project. Relying upon computers to get the right kind of outcome with regard to peace in the world is a bit scary as that movie showed. Much of our world now relies upon computers and yet there are certainly glitches. Thanks for the old movie reviews.

    working

    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

    Show Details
    Necessary
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Features
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Marketing
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Statistics
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)