ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

True Grit 1969 and True Grit 2010

Updated on January 13, 2011

 A few nights ago, I watched the vintage 1969 True Grit, John Wayne's oscar winning role and one of his last movies. The following day, I saw True Grit 2010 with Jeff Bridges filling in on the John Wayne role. Comparing the two is interesting.

The pace of the older is slower, it ponders about in places. The new one is faster, cutting out scenes deemed wasteful that were in the original. Take the 1969 movie, it opens with important family characters and background of the teenage girl, Mattie. Gives some perspective. The 2010 edition ignores it totally and states that Mattie's father was killed outside a saloon in narrative form, soon, Mattie is on the train arriving in town with a mission.

The new edition is grittier and probably depicts how the time period really was. I found the girl in the 1969 version who played Mattie totally dressed wrong for a western, it was too clean, nice. The hangings and the fights are much bloodier in the new version for sure, which fingers be cut off. The horse trading scene between Mattie and the man was very funny in the 1969 version, the 2010 editions pales in comparison. I tried to laugh and even though the dialogue was near verbatim to the 69 film, the actors were nearly not as good in pulling off this comedy.

I am sure the Cohen Brothers who wrote the script and directed used the original 1969 script. The dialogue was verbatim in many scenes and this made it hard for Bridges compete with Wayne. Wayne is iconic for western films, the swagger, the facials, the accent, he always injected quips of humor. Bridges played the Federal Marshall as a sloppy, ill-kept, cheating lawman. Mattie was a bit too serious all the time, a know-it-all becoming a bit obnoxious. So much so, that Matt Damon (who plays the Texas Ranger, LeBouf) yanks from her horse, throws on the ground and whips her with a stick. This never happened in the 69 movie. After a period of time, Bridges pulls the gun and stops it. In the 69 film, the role is played by Glen Campbell, a singer with several hits at the time. Damon is way better than Campbell in the role.

The 1969 film also had unknown actors that are now famous, Robert Duvall, who played a great adversary and I believe, Dennis Hopper, in a small role.  The 2010 film, I think, depicts that time period much more accurately in dress, look. The manner in which Wayne portrayed an aging, down and out, US Marshall, fits better and more realistic. Bridges played the role too gritty and bum-like. US Marshalls, even then, did have a particular appearance more like Wayne than Bridges.

The Coen Brothers crafted other scenes differently to some degree and added new ones not in the 69 film. The Cabin scene for one, where the bad guys fingers are cut off, and Mattie climbs to the roof to smoke out the baddies. The end is totally different. In the 69 film, Wayne basically is riding off after visiting Mattie. In the 2010, 25 years pass, and Mattie is a woman seeking her old friend, who is making a living at a wild west show. But she arrives too late, the Marshall passed away and she visits the grave site and then walks off. The panoramic shot is beautifully framed and artisitc. The scene leaves a lingering thought of how time flies by quickly in life. Something everyone can attest to.

The overall thing that struck me was the amount of dialogue and scenes that were almost verbatim to the 69 film. Maybe the Coen Brothers realised that True Grit was already a great story and just updating was all that was needed. Sort of like musical artists trying to cover a Beatle song. Hard to improve on.


    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment
    • perrya profile imageAUTHOR


      8 years ago

      I agree with you, both offer a good flim. John Wayne is simply too iconic for Bridges to fill the boots, but he did a good job.

    • Megavitamin profile image


      8 years ago

      I watched both versions recently as well. I actually enjoyed each of them in their own right. The Cohen brothers actually remained truer to the book, which the first movie was based on. That's the reason behind some of the differences and the verbatim dialogue.

      I don't usually like westerns, but I found both versions highly entertaining. I enjoyed your analysis of both films. Thanks for sharing your thoughts!


    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

    Show Details
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)