ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

Video Rewind: Valentine vs. Valentine

Updated on November 7, 2014
1981
1981

Be still My Bloody Heart

For me, Valentine's Day really is no big deal. It's just another day, but for Hollywood it meant so-so box office for two slasher movies set on this day reserved for love.

When the original My Bloody Valentine opened on Feb. 11, 1981 it really didn't seem to do very well at the box office since it wasn't a sequel to anything, but when the remake opened on Jan. 16, 2009, the remake took in over $21.2 million dollars in the first weekend alone.

So I thought I'd compare the two to determine which version is better.

In the '81 version the town of Valentine Bluffs is just getting back into the Valentine Day spirit after not celebrating the holiday for the last 20 years due to the murders of two mine supervisors (Fred Watters and Jeff Fulton) after an explosion a year earlier. They decided to leave the mine and head of for the Valentine celebration and didn't follow proper procedures for making sure all of the men had gotten out for the day. Thus an explosion occurred trapping six miners, but one, Harry Warden (Peter Cowper), was the sole survivor after resorting to cannibalism in order to survive. For revenge he comes back the following year and kills both of the supervisors and vows to continue killing every Valentine's Day as long as the town celebrates.

For the remake, there are news reports during the opening credits as Tom Hanniger (Jensen Ackles) admits to not following proper procedures set down by his father's mining company, or did he really follow proper procedures but did Harry Warden (Rich Walters) set out to kill the miners and then use the explosion as a cover up? But this time, Harry's been in a coma for a year and comes out of it on all days. Can you guess which day it is and slaughters most of the hospital staff. He manages to make it to the mine where a bunch of kids are having a party and he slaughters almost everyone in attendance except for Tom, Sarah (Jaime King), Axel (Kerr Smith) and Irene (Betsy Rue).

Of course there's the love triangle aspect to both films involving Tom, Sarah and Axel or in the case of the original TJ, Sarah and Axel (Paul Kelman, Lori Hallier and Neil Affleck respectively). Both Tom and TJ have returned back to town only to discover that Sarah and Axel are dating (the original) and married (the remake). They both want Sarah back and while we know in the original TJ had left to "find himself" on the west coast, nothing is explained in the remake until the end.

Going back to the actual filming location, the town of Valentine Bluffs could be considered a character itself. The town used in Nova Scotia was a lot more gritty, rugged and rural (what a mining town should seem like) and since it's a small town everyone knew each other. For the remake the town's been renamed to Harmony and doesn't hold that grittiness. It's too clean with nicer homes, compared to when the original Sarah is walking home late. She lives in probably the poorest part of the city and the neighborhood reflects it.

One of the common bonds in the original is the movie is about a group of friends. They all work together, have probably grown up together and hang out together, whereas the friend aspect isn't explored in the remake. The only mutual friend the three have in common is Irene but she seems to have left the pack after her and Axel broke up years earlier.

If the remake was in it for the gore factor it wins hands down. In a majority of the film someone is getting killed off, whereas in the original it's the suspense which keeps you wanting more. The kills in the original are fast or not shown, but since the sequel is in 3D I guess you would have to show something to scare the audience. Both do share the same kill which in the original was original.

The characters aren't fully developed in the remake as compared to the original. With the original you start to care for them whereas in the sequel it's more the actors are getting paid to recite lines and move about. Whenever I watch the original and Chief Newby (Don Francks) enters Mabel's Laundromat he calls out "Mabel!" and for those of us out enough it's kind of instinctive to say to yourself, "Another Black Label!" in reference to the beer.

In the remake they've reversed the party to the beginning whereas in the original they take the party away from the Union Hall (after Mayor Hanniger cancels the dance) to the mines. It's not really explained why the kids are having a party at the beginning in the mine but by holding it at the end of the movie it makes more sense. They were looking forward to something which was taken away from them and yes they paid the price of it.

Another thing with the original there wasn't a lot of nudity (in fact I don't any remember in it) but in the remake Rue is doing full frontal for a few good minutes. I'm sure it was to get the guys in, but given the choice they'd be filling the seats anyway since it involved a lot of violence.

For a movie to have held up for 30 years, my heart will always be with the original.

Comments

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    No comments yet.

    working

    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: "https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr"

    Show Details
    Necessary
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is used to quickly and efficiently deliver files such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Features
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Marketing
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisements has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Statistics
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)