ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

Why Aren't The Kree at war with the Chitauri in the MCU?

Updated on July 29, 2017
Man, the Skrulls looked ridiculous back then, and that might've been the idea.
Man, the Skrulls looked ridiculous back then, and that might've been the idea. | Source
Freaky, aren't they?
Freaky, aren't they? | Source

As I implied in my article Something About Agents Of Shield's Hive Crossed My Mind:(https://hubpages.com/entertainment/Somethingabout-Agents-of-Shields-Hive-croosed-my-mind) I've wondered why The Kree aren't at war with the Chitauri.

As I explained: in The Ultimate Marvel comic line a.k.a. "The Ultimate Marvel Universe," Black Panther's people called the skrulls "the Chitauri." The Skrulls are green skinned, ridged chinned, pointy eared shapeshifting aliens. Which differs heavily from the skull faced design in "The Avengers film," even though those Chitauri resemble the design shown in the Ultimate Marvel Comic line.

The reason this bugs me is because despite the fact that 20th Century Fox owns the film rights to The Fantastic Four and by extension rights to the Skrulls, Kree, and InHumans, their lack of utilizing these story lines could have been an opportunity for Marvel Studios. Hell Quicksilver and Scarlet Witch are in the Marvel Cinematic Universe as undefined meta-humans, and Quicksilver exist as mutant in Fox's X-men film series. So what was the hold up in establishing the Skrull/Kree conflict? Well in doing research for this post the conclusions I've come to can be simplified, but are infuriating regardless. Why? How? Well I'll address that...

This is a from a Disney XD cartoon, I'mma need to find out which so I can see this in context.
This is a from a Disney XD cartoon, I'mma need to find out which so I can see this in context. | Source
These are the characters that come to mind when I hear "The InHumans."
These are the characters that come to mind when I hear "The InHumans." | Source
InHumans as seen in Agents Of S.H.I.E.L.D.
InHumans as seen in Agents Of S.H.I.E.L.D. | Source

The Purpose Of the InHumans...

Let's start with where this whole question started for me:"Why were the InHumans created by the Kree?" As I explained my afore mentioned post, the reason for this is because in the comics the InHumans created as living weapons and ways to prevent the Kree's evolutionary stagnation. What brought me to ask this because in the comics the main adversary of the Kree are the Skrulls, but invading Chitauri died(anti-climatically enough) when IronMan nuked the mothership. Heck, on a side note, I didn't learn that those creatures were called "Chitauri" until after seeing the film in theaters. But when I did, my immediate thought was:"wait, so those were the Skrulls?" Because they seemed more mechanical than organic, especially with how easily they were defeated.

I'll speculate on that later, but my point is as far as I knew the MCU's interpretation of Skrulls were killed off. So as far as I knew the Kree was without an enemy. I was wrong about that, which it leads us to Guardians Of The Galaxy where Ronan The Accuser waged war on Xandar. Because fun fact, in the comics, the Kree eventually found themselves at war with other races. In some cases it was due to Ronan's trigger happy war-mongering. And other times it was out of their hands like when the Badoons allied with them against the Skrulls. My point is the Kree in the MCU could've created the InHumans as weapons to wage war on Xandar, as ordered by Ronan, or they could've been used to combat the Chitauri. And in doing further research I came to learn that the InHumans were created as weapons by the rogue Kree to combat the Kree Empire in Agents Of S.H.I.E.L.D. Which I argued to myself should have been the case if they were going to be "rogue Kree." But what I missed while watching Agents Of Shield was that there were Kree who disagreed with going to war with Xandar, which lead to them going rogue. As a result they created InHumans to combat Ronan and the Kree Empire. I'm glad they did this, but not just because Chitauri were defeated in The Avengers, but because it validates the existence of rogue kree. However in doing further research, I've learned that the film rights to the Skrulls are shared by Marvel Studios and 20th Century Fox. I have several qualms with this, but I'll get into them in the next segment.

The Film Rights And Potential Utilization Of The Skrulls

As I've stated, I have qualms with Marvel and 20th Century Fox share the film rights of the Skrulls, Kree, and InHumans. Actually it's not so much the fact that they share the rights, but it's how they utilized. With the Chitauri being Skrulls of the Marvel Ultimates timeline, those skull-faced freaks could've been the MCU's residential shape shifting Skrulls. Though it seems by how they utilized the Chitauri, it wasn't planned for them to be utilized beyond the Avengers film. According to Joss Wheddon, he chose the Chitauri because there was very little in their background in the comics, which made them perfect first adversaries of the Avengers.

This bugs me because of the missed opportunity here. Since the Chitauri are Skrulls from an alternate universe, they could've served to be that in the MCU. Although with the Chitauri having a hive-mind, it would've made sense for the Kree would be fighting off assimilation of a hive-mind. But another thing too is that the Chitauri and Kree serve Thanos, who could've tamed them and ended their conflict. As a result the Kree reapers could've been hunting down the InHumans to be rid of remnants of a long dead war in Agents Of S.H.I.E.L.D.

The thing is Marvel Studios seems to operate as if 20th Century Fox has already utilized the Skrull/Kree war and InHumans in cinematic form. Or maybe they're acting out of cautious, as keeping in mind that 20th Century Fox might utilize the Skrull, Kree, and InHuman lore in cinematic form eventually. And that possibility does exist, but since no one at 20th Century Fox gets what makes the Fantastic Four work, I doubt it. I'll get to my understanding of the Fantastic Four, and how it could be utilized in films at a later date. But for now, I need to move on.


The Conclusion...

Taking a step back, I learned of the shared Skrulls rights from Guardians Of The Galaxy director James Gunn. Meaning that we might see the Skrulls in the MCU, and they might be at war with the Kree. But I'll wait and see what Marvel Studio does with these rights going forward.

Also in thinking over idea for having Thanos tame the Chitauri and Kree, ending their war and saving the Kree from a hive-mind. That might've complicated the simple and accessible story thy sought to tell. Apparently Marvel Studios told Wheddon to not expand the lore for this very reason, but I can respect that, as Marvel hasn't been in business for seventy-five years for nothing.

In conclusion, because of my research I learned why the Chitauri weren't at war with the Kree. Because they weren't planned to last beyond the first film, and odds are Marvel might be cautious of utilizing the Skrull film rights. And if that's true, they're wise to do this, but it leads to missed opportunities.

Comments

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    No comments yet.

    working

    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

    Show Details
    Necessary
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Features
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Marketing
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Statistics
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)