ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

Legend of the Seeker TV series Vs. Wizards' First Rule book series

Updated on October 31, 2012

The adventures of Richard Rahl and Kahlen Amnell were WA-AY better than this!

It's happened before; the TV or movie remake of a book is planned, implimented, carried out, and then put to air. Disasterously.

Seriously! You like "Legend of the Seeker", but the inconsistancies from the original books is enough to make a fan like me reel with disbelief!

This lens is not about how good the television series "Legends of the Seeker" is. Rather about how good it ISN'T. An adpatation from a novel series is one thing, and I can think of a few more that I would dearly LURVE to see done, but it's something that shouldn't be done lightly, and above all, needs to be done RIGHT.

Richard Cypher/Rahl was NEVER an idiot.

The original Richard Cypher (later Richard Rahl) was never the idiot the tv series has portrayed him, not even for a moment.

Richard was one of those glowing characters whose perfection as a person was flawed by naivete, impulsivness, and a generosity of spirit that was often turned against him. Wise beyond his years, skilled at herb-lore and hunting, Richard grew up in Westland with his brother Michael and adoptive father George, without any knowledge of magic or the lands beyond the Boundary. His mother was killed in a house fire when he and Michael were very young, which is later revealled as Darken Rahl's work.

Intuitive and friends with everyone, the original Richard was a "rare person".

This Richard seems plagued with stupidity, stumbling along with the Mother Confessor and First Wizard as parent figures in a story line that has strayed so far from the original storyline you wonder it's even the same characters.

Terry Goodkind's Sword of Truth Series

Get better educated on this series. Buy yourself the original books.

Darken Rahl, Richard, and Jensen are all related....

but they aren't all brothers and sister!

Darken Rahl was not brunette - he was white-blonde with startling blue eyes, who had been badly scarred on one side of his body as a child by the Wizard's Fire the First Wizard sent through to D'Hara to kill his father, Panis Rahl, before the Boundary went up.

He was also FATHER to Richard and Jensen, not brother. Darken Rahl raped Richard's mother (Zed's daughter) before the boundary went up, and Jensen's mother was one of the many Darken Rahl used and abused over his years.

Jensen Rahl was always one of the supremely ungifted, that much they got right. But that seems to be about all the got right about her, from what I've seen. She was strong, confident, and very intelligent. This one seems like a real push over.

Michael Cypher wasn't a good guy

In fact, he is the reason Darken Rahl was able to capture Richard in the first place.

Michael Cypher grew up believing that Richard was his blood brother, but other than shared parentage, the comparisons stop there. Where Richard was kind and generous of spirit, Michael was greedy and selfish, thirsting for power.

The moment in the book when Richard figures this out is quite cleverly written; he is under a spell of Darken Rahl's that makes his friends see him as their greatest enemy, and his enemies see him as himself. In order to seek Michael's urgently needed assistance, Richard recalls a game they played as children, and the "Loser's Salute" that Michael insisted Richard present when the former beat the latter. Dropping to his knees in front of his older brother, Richard smiles and performs the salute, only to have Michael frown and ask him what he's doing on his kness...

Michael DID end up dead, this much is consistant with the books. However, Michael Cypher was executed by Lord Rahl as a traitor to the People of Westland, the Midlands, and D'hara.

So, NOT a hero intent on helping the Seeker free his people.

It looks like a knock-off of Xena and Hercules

Now, I'm not actually knocking Xena and Hercules. I used to adore both shows, and am in the process of building my DVD collection to include them.

But given the leaps and bounds in film and computer technology, why does it look just the same as it did 10 odd years ago? I realise they're probably filming in the same locations (New Zealand, my hat off to you, the scenery there is hard to resist), but the costumes, the camera techniques....was there a sell-out on old props?

If this is what TV is coming to, give me a good book everytime!

Now, this isn't what you'd call a marshalled offensive against the very broad poetic license that has been taken in turning Terry Goodkind's Sword of Truth series into what some people only know - and love - as Legends of the Seeker. In fact, it's not.

The books themselves started brilliantly, but I gave up trying to follow the plot about halfway through "Naked Empire". What started as a good fantasy adventure series turned into a vehicle for Goodkind to explore his ideas on theology. (Which isn't necessarily a bad thing, but when that takes over the story, you've lost the plot in a number of ways).

By the way, I happen to ENJOY discussion theology. I think there's alot of valid belief systems out there.

But I don't like my fantasy adventure novels to turn into someone's personal gospel on how to live.

Post Scriptum

I have to confess. I've been watching the second season, and I think you could nearly call me a fan now.

That said, I do still feel that there was a great deal in the TV series that could have (should have?) been improved, and alas, with it's cancellation, there's now not going to be a 3rd season during which we could hope for this.

For those who saw the series first and loved it - you will enjoy the books.

For those who read the books first - you'll have to make up your own minds.

Share your thoughts

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • KeemaWolf profile imageAUTHOR

      Fiona Findlay 

      7 years ago from Queensland, Australia

      @MentorPalokaj: That was pretty disappointing. They also had Nicci die there, and she didn't. She's aroudn for a great deal longer in the books! No mention of Warren, or any of the other issues/secrets from the Palace of the Prophets - no Nathan!

      I think that they should have done a book per series. That way they stood less of a chance of offending the original fans of the books, and the plot would have been more solid.

      Also easier to finish at the end of a season.

    • profile image


      7 years ago

      I Really REALLY hate the fact they took away Richards magic in the series. He is a war wizard, I mean come on everything the guy does is magic. Why don't they ever make a movie/series fully (as much as possible) sticking to the book plot? It's not like we can't handle the special effects or anything...

    • KeemaWolf profile imageAUTHOR

      Fiona Findlay 

      8 years ago from Queensland, Australia

      @Arizona-Snow: Too be 100% honest, I couldn't stand to watch the whole series! I caught a few episodes, and cringed so hard I had to change the channel or switch the TV off entirely!

      But so true! The Mud People are a very important part of the continuity of the whole series. Such a shame to miss something so vital to the over all plot!

      Yes, that's true. Poetic license carried to the outer edges, I think.

      Thanks for visiting!

    • Arizona-Snow profile image


      8 years ago

      I'm forever telling ppl the differences between the books and the series. My biggest critisism though is ... where are the Mud People????

      The only good thing about the show is that it can keep you guessing as it don't follow the books at all, it is only BASED on the books and they use that term very loosely too.

    • profile image


      8 years ago

      @WindyWintersHubs: they are definitelly different

    • profile image


      8 years ago

      @KeemaWolf: Yeah, I am glad for every day I have the luxury to live in a world like this:o)

      best wishes^^

    • KeemaWolf profile imageAUTHOR

      Fiona Findlay 

      8 years ago from Queensland, Australia

      @anonymous: Hey Waylander, thanks for visiting my lens.

      You don't have to agree with me - that's the beauty of us living in a free world!

    • profile image


      8 years ago

      I woulnd't dare to judge anything just because it did things in a different way they were done once. Re-animating a book, taking it as a inspiration for creating pretty much of a good show is no violation on any of Wizard's rules for me.

      Will add an example - have seen the old Battlestar Galactica? And the new one? The new one is wayyy better, and I won't blame it for being different than the original either.

      Just stop disdain thins only because they are different.

    • profile image


      8 years ago

      i gave up on watching the shows after the first few were on. THEY HAVE SLAUGHTERED TERRY GOODKINDS WORK!!!

    • KeemaWolf profile imageAUTHOR

      Fiona Findlay 

      8 years ago from Queensland, Australia

      @WindyWintersHubs: Thanks, Windy :-) I aim to.

    • WindyWintersHubs profile image


      8 years ago from Vancouver Island, BC

      It seems the book version is much better than the TV version for most shows. Keep up the good work. ~Squid Greeter


    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

    Show Details
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)